What Is CJ Roberts Waiting For?

[Turtlesoup]

Roberts has already verified the leaked brief is legit, signifying the USSC is poised to overturn RVW.

The leak is meant to intimidate and pressure USSC Justices, allows liberals to engage in feat-mongering, and has provided Democrats the time and opportinity to fund-raise off of the leak to fund liberal legislation making abortions legal in all 9 months of pregnancies.

It has been reported Toberts was ready to allow a ban on abortions after so many weeks but did not want RVW overturned...

...leading some to believe that his desire to have the leak investigated is for show because he either wants his fellow judges to be pressured to change their opinions or is directly connected to the well-timed / orchestrated leak.

The best way to eliminate the intimidation and unwanted pressure on the court is to just relesee the decision now.

What is he waiting for?

CBS: Roberts may call in the FBI to probe leaks

hotair.com

Does anyone really believe calling in the proven highly criminal / rogue FBI will make anyone feel better?

Roberts is a swamp dwelling asshole----complete with his own trips on the Epsteins plane. He is the one who pushed to make illegal anchors citizens which opened up the flooding of illegals into the US---he's the one that kept senile mentally out of it Gainsberg on the court with her clerks doing her voting. You know the odds are that it was Jackson and/or her clerks as they are the newbies to the court-----to try this newish stunt.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Roberts has already verified the leaked brief is legit, signifying the USSC is poised to overturn RVW.

The leak is meant to intimidate and pressure USSC Justices, allows liberals to engage in feat-mongering, and has provided Democrats the time and opportinity to fund-raise off of the leak to fund liberal legislation making abortions legal in all 9 months of pregnancies.

It has been reported Toberts was ready to allow a ban on abortions after so many weeks but did not want RVW overturned...

...leading some to believe that his desire to have the leak investigated is for show because he either wants his fellow judges to be pressured to change their opinions or is directly connected to the well-timed / orchestrated leak.

The best way to eliminate the intimidation and unwanted pressure on the court is to just relesee the decision now.

What is he waiting for?

CBS: Roberts may call in the FBI to probe leaks

hotair.com

Does anyone really believe calling in the proven highly criminal / rogue FBI will make anyone feel better?

The LEAK and the fucking verdict discussion were both timed for the election. SWAMP wants to hurt trump and provide cover for the swamp.

 

[BS Filter]

When RvW is overturned abortion will still be legal in states that legalize it. The democrats are having their usual drama during an election year to stir up the voters. Everyone can calm down now.

 

[BS Filter]

Roberts is a swamp dwelling asshole----complete with his own trips on the Epsteins plane. He is the one who pushed to make illegal anchors citizens which opened up the flooding of illegals into the US---he's the one that kept senile mentally out of it Gainsberg on the court with her clerks doing her voting. You know the odds are that it was Jackson and/or her clerks as they are the newbies to the court-----to try this newish stunt.

Jackson isn't on the court yet.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Jackson isn't on the court yet.

Well then that leaves the USUAL Supreme court players-------
The leak was planned
But so too was the discussions and whatever this paper was nonsense---

All done for the election.

 

[easyt65]

Again, what is Roberts waiting on? Why won't he release the a actual final decision on RVW?

He has given the Democrats time to engage in fear-mongering, call for intimidation of the court, call for violence against Justices, incite terrorist attacks against police and Americans who oppose the Democrats' demands.

He has allowed Democrats to undermine e the court, attemptto delegitimize the USSC, to undermine the Judicial system, and call for an insurrection.

He has 'let the pot boil', giving Democrats time to divide the nation.

He has failed to protect the country, Americans, the court, and his fellow Justices by delaying.

WTF is he waiting on?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The left has dirt on him. He'll do whatever they tell him to do.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Again, what is Roberts waiting on? Why won't he release the a actual final decision on RVW?

He has given the Democrats time to engage in fear-mongering, call for intimidation of the court, call for violence against Justices, incite terrorist attacks against police and Americans who oppose the Democrats' demands.

He has allowed Democrats to undermine e the court, attemptto delegitimize the USSC, to undermine the Judicial system, and call for an insurrection.

He has 'let the pot boil', giving Democrats time to divide the nation.

He has failed to protect the country, Americans, the court, and his fellow Justices by delaying.

WTF is he waiting on?

What do you want him to do? Release the ruling? The majority of SCOTUS decisions are released mid-June, so you have about a month to wait.

 

[easyt65]

What do you want him to do? Release the ruling? The majority of SCOTUS decisions are released mid-June, so you have about a month to wait.

Special circumstances - waiting a month, now that liberals know its coming, allows them to organize, continue to break laws, threaten judges, firebomb more anti-abortion groups, and allows Democrats to further divide the country while incitingviolence and insurrection.

Yes, for the good of the country and safety of the Justices and other Americans, announce the division.

(Typo corrected after Spelling Police Tory pointed it out - thanks 'Admiral')

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Special circumstances - waiting a month, now that liberals know its coming, allows them to organize, continue to break laws, threaten judges, firebomb more anti-abortion groups, and allows Democrats to further divide the country while incitingviolence and insurrection.

Yes, for the good of the country and safety of the Justices and other Americans, announce the devision.

Oh, come on! You think that releasing the ruling is going to change anything? If so, I have some oceanfront property in Nebraska to sell you!

Get a grip on reality!

BTW, the word is "division".

 

[jc456]

Add to that, if the decision changes, it will be seen as intimidation that worked and that will GUARANTEE it will happen over and over.

what it will actually confirm that the election fraud was just as we all stated.

 

[easyt65]

Oh, come on! You think that releasing the ruling is going to change anything? If so, I have some oceanfront property in Nebraska to sell you!

Get a grip on reality!

BTW, the word is "division".

It would give libs less time to develop their pressure/intimidation campaign...and you know it. If not you're not that bright.

 

[jc456]

It would give libs less time to develop their pressure/intimidation campaign...and you know it. If not you're not that bright.

Easy, they cheat, it makes no difference what happens when and how. All they have to do is pay for the mules to run the illegal ballots as they did in 2020. They most likely already have the counties they need set up and are all ready to go.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It would give libs less time to develop their pressure/intimidation campaign...and you know it. If not you're not that bright.

Again, why do you think libs will stop their pressure intimidation routine after the decision is released? You apparently are not that bright because you don't know liberal hate mongering!

 

[easyt65]

Again, why do you think libs will stop their pressure intimidation routine after the decision is released? You apparently are not that bright because you don't know liberal hate mongering!

After the decision is final, what would they have to PRESSURE the Justices about then? The decision would be officially final with no chance to intimidate them into changing their votes.

I did not say they would stop their emotional tantrum throwing, breaking the law, and terrorist activities, but they could at least begin to come to grips with the fact that the reversal of RvW is a 'done deal' and perhaps their violence would not last as long.

If the decision is not released until June they have another month of committing violence and insurrection in hopes of pressuring them to change their votes followed by additional time to rage, loot, and burn from anger before moving on to acceptance.

Release it now and you skip the month of violent 'pressure' campaign and move on to anger over the decision and faster move to eventual acceptance.

Again, your ignorance / rejection of this concept shows you're not much of a tactician and you're no 'Admiral Rockwell Tory'. The real one would not recommend doing nothing while being threatened and punched in the face by 'the enemy' for a month.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

After the decision is final, what would they have to pressure the Justices about then?

I did not say they would stop their emotional tantrum throwing, breaking the law, and terrorist activities, but they could at least begin to come to grips with the fact that the reversal of RvW is a 'done deal' and perhaps their violence would not last as long.

If the decision is not released until June they have another month of committing violence and insurrection in hopes of pressuring them to change their votes followed by additional time to rage, loot, and burn from anger before moving on to acceptance.

Release it now and you skip the month of violent 'pressure' campaign and move on to anger over the decision and faster move to eventual acceptance.

Again, your ignorance / rejection of this concept shows you're not much of a tactician abd you're no 'Admiral Rockwell Tory'. The real one would not recommend doing nothing while being punched in the face by 'the enemy' for a month.

Apparently, the decision is final. All of the liberal caterwauling will continue until the next outrage hits the media. The only changing of votes might be a libtard justice signing on to the majority. That is not going to happen either!

 

[easyt65]

Apparently, the decision is final. All of the liberal caterwauling will continue until the next outrage hits the media. The only changing of votes might be a libtard justice signing on to the majority. That is not going to happen either!

A leaked brief is not an official decision released by the USSC.

It was reported in the 1st leak that Roberts intended to allow RvW to remain as-is and convince conservative judge to join him.

As they say, 'It ain't over til the fat lady sings' and she is as silent as a church mouse right now as no final official decisionbeen released.

Until then it's all assumption and speculation.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

A leaked brief is not an official decision released by the USSC.

It was reported in the 1st leak that Roberts intended to allow RvW to remain as-is and convince conservative judge to join him.

As they say, 'It ain't over til the fat lady sings' and she is as silent as a church mouse right now as no final official decisionbeen released.

Until then it's all assumption and speculation.

I guess you were asleep when Roberts stated it was valid? Roberts was in the minority. You need to educate yourself on this issue. I am done trying, as you seem to have your heart set on posting disinformation.

Have a nice freakin' day!

 

[easyt65]

I guess you were asleep when Roberts stated it was valid? !

Of course not - he confirmed the brief that was leaked by some criminal was a valid DRAFT composed in the USSC by a USSC Justice

That fact does not change the reality and fact of what I said:

A LEAKED DRAFT is NOT the sane thing as an official, FIAL announced decision made public by the USSC.

Until such time when the USSC officially announces its decision Justices could potentially change their votes.