What is really allowed for women in the US?

This rave in Riyadh would never been allowed until recent reforms. No gender separation. uncovered women dancing with men. very progressive for Saudi.
 
This rave in Riyadh would never been allowed until recent reforms. No gender separation. uncovered women dancing with men. very progressive for Saudi.


I do not think that this is the most progressive thing that can be found in Islam

 
Islam does not prescribe to love boys, but descriptions of the Muslim Paradise testify to the place of pederasty in the life of the Arabs, where beautiful boys, together with houris, serve the righteous: “And they will have boys among them, as if they were hidden pearls” (Quran, 52:17 –29); “and dark-eyed, like hidden pearls (Quran, 56:22-23); "And immortal boys will be among them, when you see them, you will consider them scattered pearls" (Quran, 76:19); “And they must have perfect partners in [gardens]…” (Quran, 2:25); “And they must have blameless partners in them…” (Quran, 4:57).
[...]
In Sahih al-Bukhari there is a hadith about the prohibition of a man marrying a woman whose son was his lover: "As for (who) plays with the boy: if he entered him, then he should not marry his mother." [272] There is no resentment here at "playing" with the boy;

translated from Russian from here

And after that you will argue that the Arabs have patriarchy?

If, for example, this is compared with the Avestan laws, then this is completely incomparable, there sodomy was punishable by death, with the exception of rape. But even the raped was formally punished.
 
Once I even came across an advices to the prince, where he was advised to try both types of love: for women and men, so as not to deprive himself of pleasure and to know both sides of love.
 
Now there is a total reshaping of history and culture, they have turned everything upside down. Yes, there was matriarchy in old Europe, and there have always been traces of it in northern Europe. But in America, no traces of matriarchy are visible, and the traditions of America have so far been absolutely patriarchal. This is evidenced by the superman cult, and the constitution itself, it is probably the only constitution of a democratic country where gender equality is not declared, and the US political system is almost like a vassal system of medieval knights.

American sports are extremely tough. I can't imagine how women will perform at rodeos, for example. Only one fool in a million would do that.
American boxing before Ali was the toughest in the world, especially before the 40s. Dempsey is the toughest boxer of all time, Tyson is just a cutie in comparison.
 
Even now in America, crossfit, which Europeans do not pull because of its rigidity. Although women do CrossFit. But few people do it in Europe, and even more so somewhere in Arabia or the Caucasus.
It's not easy. CrossFit is not an easy sport, it is only for those who have good explosive qualities - male qualites. These are mostly natural, genetically determined. Technical explosive pull-ups for example. These are classic athletic data, such qualities are needed almost everywhere in Olimpic atletics

The fact that this style appeared in America says a lot.
 
This is exactly the main reason why most women cannot punch well. They lack explosive qualities.
The female weight of the throwing core is 2 times less than the male one. Here you can see the difference very clearly. With any body weight and muscle mass, a woman is still 2 times weaker in shot throwing. Even the biggest women pumped up with testosterone cannot throw a man's weight comparable to a man.
 
For comparison: the first constitution of the USSR was adopted in 1936 (before that there was only the constitution of Russia of 18, where there was also only equality in voting). It directly declared gender equality in all respects. The Americans did not do this even under Roosevelt.
 
This is exactly the main reason why most women cannot punch well. They lack explosive qualities.
The female weight of the throwing core is 2 times less than the male one. Here you can see the difference very clearly. With any body weight and muscle mass, a woman is still 2 times weaker in shot throwing. Even the biggest women pumped up with testosterone cannot throw a man's weight comparable to a man.
Who says we have to punch with our arms/hands.......................:heehee: You're INCEL, aren't you?
 
Who says we have to punch with our arms/hands.......................:heehee: You're INCEL, aren't you?
A 3-year-old child can fire a pistol. Is he "gender equal" too?

This is a good trick for men who are physically close to the female type, they justify their "muskulinity" by the fact that they can stick an awl in the back. For such men, feminism is beneficial, and this is exactly what evolution will be if there is gender equality.
 
You're INCEL, aren't you?
BTW it is also a delusion that sexual promiscuity gives some kind of courage. Male frogs are smaller than females and they ride them when they do it. This does not make them men in the human sense.

Infamous dogs know how to fuck everything, this suggests that they try to scatter the shameful seed wherever they can. The noble ones, on the contrary, avoided scattering the seed.
 
BTW it is also a delusion that sexual promiscuity gives some kind of courage. Male frogs are smaller than females and they ride them when they do it. This does not make them men in the human sense.

Infamous dogs know how to fuck everything, this suggests that they try to scatter the shameful seed wherever they can. The noble ones, on the contrary, avoided scattering the seed.
You're INCEL, aren't you?
 
There was no need to specifically forbid because everything is forbiden by default, that goes without saying.

There is no "20th century mentality", just the chatter of scammers that we will wipe away like light dust from the rock of millennia.

You are 100% incorrect. What goes without saying is that all rights are assumed by default, except where the law gives the government to right to infringe.
 
Then why the 19th amendment?

To standardize it across states. Hate to break it to you, but not all states prohibited women from voting prior to the 19th Amendment, just as not all states viewed black people as property prior to the 13th Amendment.
 
Yes, it's not in the constitution.

Lots of things aren't in the Constitution. Who told you that the Constitution is the sum total of all laws and regulations in the United States? Because I'm thinking they did it as a joke, so they could laugh at you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top