rightnow909
Diamond Member
- Oct 5, 2021
- 4,789
- 2,710
- 1,908
- Thread starter
- #61
true but what does that have to do w/ topic?People are people
People do not change.
Those who seek to rule do it more for themselves not for those they would rule.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
true but what does that have to do w/ topic?People are people
People do not change.
Those who seek to rule do it more for themselves not for those they would rule.
no, any idiot knows that expecting things from... whomever is a problematic thing...I don't expect anything.
It is expectation that leads to craving and craving is to be avoided.
You need to read the Tao
Funny you just said that a person that doesn't expect anything from other people is a liar.no, any idiot knows that expecting things from... whomever is a problematic thing...
doesn't take some TaO thing to know that...
if u say you never expect anything from anyone, you lie
It has to do with the reliability of the Bible because it was men seeking to retain the power of the church that decided what to include and excludetrue but what does that have to do w/ topic?
geez.. looks like a reading comprehension problemFunny you just said that a person that doesn't expect anything from other people is a liar.
And I quote
Now you say it's prudent not to expect anything from others.
And the Tao is a treasure trove of knowledge and it's your loss if you don't want to read it.
I'm not discussing such things with people who do not understand Catholicism... waste o'timeIt has to do with the reliability of the Bible because it was men seeking to retain the power of the church that decided what to include and exclude
Much like taking a hunting pup and tossing into a thicket full of snakes. The smart ones can do it over and over and never get hit. The dumb ones don;t last long .Then what do you call creating Satan and unleashing him on the people your god is supposed to love.
The analogy works just fine.
You would know I guessgeez.. looks like a reading comprehension problem
just bc it is stupid to expect things from others
doesn't mean people don't do it anyway
It has to do with the reliability of the Bible because it was men seeking to retain the power of the church that decided what to include and exclude
My ethos?....and there's nothing wrong with that, according to your own ethos. Men wanted to retain power, so what? That's what some people do under relative morality. **shrug**
My ethos?
Care to tell me exactly what you think my ethos is?
I said relative.Subjective morality. Morality is relative. It's whatever society says is cool.
So. When the ancient pagans fed their babies to the gods --cool. No problem. They decided it was okay.
I said relative.
And yes they did decide it was OK to do which is just more proof that morals change as societies change.
History proves my point.
Jews don't assign omni-attributes to God, so they're logically okay.Orthodox Jews do not eat fruit from trees until the third year it bears as a reminder about waiting for the proper time.
How many years did those anomalies last?That change didn't last though; it was an anomaly. The fact is that you need morality to be relative.
How many years did those anomalies last?
Hundreds, thousands?
You are looking at the past through the lens of today and when you do that your understanding become distorted
It's not a need it is an OBSERVATION.I can't argue with your personal need. You need what you need. And you need morality to be subjective, even though you wouldn't recognize a world where that was true