When You've Lost Chomsky......

The Left's Dark Prince, the lying anti-American, anti-Semite genius Noam Chomsky......well,....
Chomsky thinks you're a joke if you believe the Democrat Trump/Putin Collusion Thesis.


Never thought I'd be quoting this villain....but this is good:

1. "During a recent interview with Democracy Now, Noam Chomsky demonstrated what everyone with a clear head and capacity for critical thought should already know. Just because you have a strong dislike for Donald Trump, doesn’t mean you latch on like a lunatic to every nonsensical Russia conspiracy theory because you’re still crying about Hillary’s loss.

2 NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s a pretty remarkable fact that—first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships.

3. Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.




4. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump’s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That’s—the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed.

5. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can’t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, “Sure, that’s just what they ought to be doing.”




6. So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That’s not a major issue.

Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it."
Noam Chomsky Calls Democrats' Obsession With Russia Conspiracy Theories "A Joke" | Zero Hedge


OMG!!!

Noam Chomsky.....a semi-rational Liberal!!!!

Alice in Wonderland:
Curiouser and curiouser.
Ya know a CONservative has gone off the rails when they call a JEW an anti semite! ROFLMAO!



How about I simply call you an imbecile?

And now....show you why you should never doubt me:

Chomsky On Jews and Israel

  • “I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the holocaust. Nor would there be anti-Semitic implications, per se, in the claim that the holocaust (whether one believes it took place or not) is being exploited, viciously so, by apologists for Israeli repression and violence.”[9]
  • “The Hebrew press is much more open than the English language press, and there’s a very obvious reason: Hebrew is a secret language, you only read it if you’re inside the tribe.” [10]
  • “The point is, these organizations [Anti-Defamation League] don’t ultimately care about anti-Semitism, what they care about is opposition to the policies of Israel-in fact, opposition to their own hawkish version of the policies of Israel.”[11]
  • “I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state.”[12]
  • Israel is “a state based on the principle of discrimination. There is no other way for a state with non-Jewish citizens to remain a Jewish state…”[13]
  • “Israel is virtually a US military base, an offshoot of the US military system.”[14]
  • “There are a great many horrible regimes in the world. To take just one, the world's longest military occupation. There's little doubt that those under the military occupation would be much better off if the occupation were terminated. Does it follow that we should bomb Tel Aviv?” [15]
  • “Of course [suicide bombers are] terrorists and there's been Palestinian terrorism all the way through. I have always opposed it….But it's very small as compared with the US-backed Israeli terrorism.”[16]
  • Compares Palestinians to African Americans in the South: “I mean you’d have to go back to the worst days of the American South to know what it’s been like for the Palestinians in the occupied territories.”[17]
  • On War of Independence: Arab states were “reluctant” to enter war and the war “was to a large extent not directed against Israel. Of course, they didn’t want the State of Israel around either, and they opposed it-but that was probably a minor consideration in the attack; really a minor consideration, actually.”[18]
  • “What this wall is really doing is…helping turn Palestinian communities into dungeons, next to which the bantustans of South Africa look like symbols of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination.”[19]
9] Chomsky letter cited in W.D. Rubinstein, “Chomsky and the Neo-Nazis,” Quadrant (Australia), October 1981, pp. 8-14; also cited in Werner Cohn, “Chomsky and Holocaust Denial,” The Anti-Chomsky Reader, Collier and Horowitz (editors), 2004, pp. 129-130.

[10] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[11] p. 52, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky

[12] Soloman, Deborah. Questions for Noam Chomsky: The Ultimate Procovator. THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: 11-02-03: QUESTIONS FOR NOAM CHOMSKY; The Professorial Provocateur

[13] Noam Chomsky, Peace in the Middle East?, 1975 p. 37

[14] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[15] Interview with Noam Chomsky, “Chomsky on War,” Znet Magazine, March 31 2003 at http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=3357

[16] Chomsky Interview, Znet, Australia, April 8 2002 at http://www.zmag.org/content/Mideast/chomlateline.cfm

[17] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p. 124, online at www.understandingpower.com/

[18] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p.132 online at www.understandingpower.com/

[19] Noam Chomsky, “The Wall as a Weapon,” New York Times Op Ed, February 23 2004




In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeee!!!!!
Chomsky is still a Jew. Also being CRITICAL of the terrorist state doesn't equal anti semitism snowflake.
 
You find this 'principled'?
1. He has figured out how to make an exceptional fortune while living as a self-described ‘anarchist-socialist’ dissident in a capitalist society he has described as a ‘police state.’

a. He claims to be constantly threatened with censorship, while publishing dozens of books.

b. He denounces the Pentagon as the epitome of evil, while making million from his work for the very same institution. As a tenured MIT professor he actually works for the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT, and same is entirely funded by the Pentagon and a few multinational corporations.

c. His first book, “Syntactic Structures,” was written with grants from the US Army (Signal Corp), the Air Force (Office of Scientific Research, Air Research, and Development Command), and Office of Naval Research.

2. A Professor of Linguistics, Chomsky is vital to the air force and others to improve their “increasingly large investment in so-called ‘command and control’ computer systems” that were being used in Vietnam. Since the computer cannot ‘understand’ English, the commanders’ communications must be translated into a language that the computer can use. http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/back/Wnext26/Chomsky.html



I said he was an evil genius...but he is lying scum, one more thing he has in common with the Democrats.
It is all in pursuit of destroying any semblance of the founders' America and truly creating a socialist utopia.

His views of what the best society would look like are actually very similar to my own, but the difference is that I understand America was founded as a Constitutional Republic and should stay that way as long as possible.



Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
 
You find this 'principled'?
1. He has figured out how to make an exceptional fortune while living as a self-described ‘anarchist-socialist’ dissident in a capitalist society he has described as a ‘police state.’

a. He claims to be constantly threatened with censorship, while publishing dozens of books.

b. He denounces the Pentagon as the epitome of evil, while making million from his work for the very same institution. As a tenured MIT professor he actually works for the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT, and same is entirely funded by the Pentagon and a few multinational corporations.

c. His first book, “Syntactic Structures,” was written with grants from the US Army (Signal Corp), the Air Force (Office of Scientific Research, Air Research, and Development Command), and Office of Naval Research.

2. A Professor of Linguistics, Chomsky is vital to the air force and others to improve their “increasingly large investment in so-called ‘command and control’ computer systems” that were being used in Vietnam. Since the computer cannot ‘understand’ English, the commanders’ communications must be translated into a language that the computer can use. http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/back/Wnext26/Chomsky.html



I said he was an evil genius...but he is lying scum, one more thing he has in common with the Democrats.
It is all in pursuit of destroying any semblance of the founders' America and truly creating a socialist utopia.

His views of what the best society would look like are actually very similar to my own, but the difference is that I understand America was founded as a Constitutional Republic and should stay that way as long as possible.



Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
 
The Left's Dark Prince, the lying anti-American, anti-Semite genius Noam Chomsky......well,....
Chomsky thinks you're a joke if you believe the Democrat Trump/Putin Collusion Thesis.


Never thought I'd be quoting this villain....but this is good:

1. "During a recent interview with Democracy Now, Noam Chomsky demonstrated what everyone with a clear head and capacity for critical thought should already know. Just because you have a strong dislike for Donald Trump, doesn’t mean you latch on like a lunatic to every nonsensical Russia conspiracy theory because you’re still crying about Hillary’s loss.

2 NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s a pretty remarkable fact that—first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships.

3. Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.




4. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump’s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That’s—the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed.

5. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can’t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, “Sure, that’s just what they ought to be doing.”




6. So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That’s not a major issue.

Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it."
Noam Chomsky Calls Democrats' Obsession With Russia Conspiracy Theories "A Joke" | Zero Hedge


OMG!!!

Noam Chomsky.....a semi-rational Liberal!!!!

Alice in Wonderland:
Curiouser and curiouser.
Ya know a CONservative has gone off the rails when they call a JEW an anti semite! ROFLMAO!



How about I simply call you an imbecile?

And now....show you why you should never doubt me:

Chomsky On Jews and Israel

  • “I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the holocaust. Nor would there be anti-Semitic implications, per se, in the claim that the holocaust (whether one believes it took place or not) is being exploited, viciously so, by apologists for Israeli repression and violence.”[9]
  • “The Hebrew press is much more open than the English language press, and there’s a very obvious reason: Hebrew is a secret language, you only read it if you’re inside the tribe.” [10]
  • “The point is, these organizations [Anti-Defamation League] don’t ultimately care about anti-Semitism, what they care about is opposition to the policies of Israel-in fact, opposition to their own hawkish version of the policies of Israel.”[11]
  • “I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state.”[12]
  • Israel is “a state based on the principle of discrimination. There is no other way for a state with non-Jewish citizens to remain a Jewish state…”[13]
  • “Israel is virtually a US military base, an offshoot of the US military system.”[14]
  • “There are a great many horrible regimes in the world. To take just one, the world's longest military occupation. There's little doubt that those under the military occupation would be much better off if the occupation were terminated. Does it follow that we should bomb Tel Aviv?” [15]
  • “Of course [suicide bombers are] terrorists and there's been Palestinian terrorism all the way through. I have always opposed it….But it's very small as compared with the US-backed Israeli terrorism.”[16]
  • Compares Palestinians to African Americans in the South: “I mean you’d have to go back to the worst days of the American South to know what it’s been like for the Palestinians in the occupied territories.”[17]
  • On War of Independence: Arab states were “reluctant” to enter war and the war “was to a large extent not directed against Israel. Of course, they didn’t want the State of Israel around either, and they opposed it-but that was probably a minor consideration in the attack; really a minor consideration, actually.”[18]
  • “What this wall is really doing is…helping turn Palestinian communities into dungeons, next to which the bantustans of South Africa look like symbols of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination.”[19]
9] Chomsky letter cited in W.D. Rubinstein, “Chomsky and the Neo-Nazis,” Quadrant (Australia), October 1981, pp. 8-14; also cited in Werner Cohn, “Chomsky and Holocaust Denial,” The Anti-Chomsky Reader, Collier and Horowitz (editors), 2004, pp. 129-130.

[10] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[11] p. 52, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky

[12] Soloman, Deborah. Questions for Noam Chomsky: The Ultimate Procovator. THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: 11-02-03: QUESTIONS FOR NOAM CHOMSKY; The Professorial Provocateur

[13] Noam Chomsky, Peace in the Middle East?, 1975 p. 37

[14] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[15] Interview with Noam Chomsky, “Chomsky on War,” Znet Magazine, March 31 2003 at http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=3357

[16] Chomsky Interview, Znet, Australia, April 8 2002 at http://www.zmag.org/content/Mideast/chomlateline.cfm

[17] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p. 124, online at www.understandingpower.com/

[18] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p.132 online at www.understandingpower.com/

[19] Noam Chomsky, “The Wall as a Weapon,” New York Times Op Ed, February 23 2004




In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeee!!!!!
Chomsky is still a Jew. Also being CRITICAL of the terrorist state doesn't equal anti semitism snowflake.



WHAT?????

You need yet another verbal custard pie smashed in your kisser????



No prob.


"Of a pattern with this animus toward Israel is Chomsky’s involvement with neo-Nazis and Holocaust revisionism. This saga began in 1980 with Chomsky’s support of Robert Faurisson, a French anti-Semite who was fired by the University of Lyon for his hate-filled screeds. (“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie,” Faurisson wrote.) Chomsky penned a preface to a book by Faurisson, explaining that the latter was an “apolitical liberal” whose work was based on “extensive historical research” and contained “no hint of anti-Semitic implications.” http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/noamchomskyprofile.html
 
It is all in pursuit of destroying any semblance of the founders' America and truly creating a socialist utopia.

His views of what the best society would look like are actually very similar to my own, but the difference is that I understand America was founded as a Constitutional Republic and should stay that way as long as possible.



Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Although I am not a Marxist, I definitely see that capitalism is failing now.

Once Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism, capitalism won't produce shit anymore.

It is all about the culture, and capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.
 
It is all in pursuit of destroying any semblance of the founders' America and truly creating a socialist utopia.

His views of what the best society would look like are actually very similar to my own, but the difference is that I understand America was founded as a Constitutional Republic and should stay that way as long as possible.



Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people is far better than anything capitalism can do. Good people just don't usually end up in government.

The end-game for capitalism is oblivion btw.
 
Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Although I am not a Marxist, I definitely see that capitalism is failing now.

Once Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism, capitalism won't produce shit anymore.

It is all about the culture, and capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.


1. " I definitely see that capitalism is failing now."

Where? Certainly not in regulation-encumbered America.

2. "Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism"

You've got that backwards.
The Globalists are of the Left, not those who support free markets.


3 'capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.'
The culture that I endorse is one of freedom.
It is what the Founders promised: individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

The six I named earlier are founded on the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



You should re-think your position.
 
Oh....and if you yearn for " a socialist utopia"....
Check this out:

"Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship"
Venezuela Reminds Us That Socialism Frequently Leads to Dictatorship
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people is far better than anything capitalism can do. Good people just don't usually end up in government.

The end-game for capitalism is oblivion btw.

"An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people..."

Protect them from what?

The Nazis were all powerful and socialist.

Protected the people??????
 
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Although I am not a Marxist, I definitely see that capitalism is failing now.

Once Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism, capitalism won't produce shit anymore.

It is all about the culture, and capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.


1. " I definitely see that capitalism is failing now."

Where? Certainly not in regulation-encumbered America.

2. "Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism"

You've got that backwards.
The Globalists are of the Left, not those who support free markets.


3 'capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.'
The culture that I endorse is one of freedom.
It is what the Founders promised: individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

The six I named earlier are founded on the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


Here is the difference, pictorially:
clip_image001.jpg
clip_image001.jpg
"Freedom" is not a culture, it is an ideal.

If you allow people to do whatever the hell they want they will just become mindless "progressives" who destroy the very country that gave them that freedom.

Capitalism is just a suicide pact.
 
Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Although I am not a Marxist, I definitely see that capitalism is failing now.

Once Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism, capitalism won't produce shit anymore.

It is all about the culture, and capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.


1. " I definitely see that capitalism is failing now."

Where? Certainly not in regulation-encumbered America.

2. "Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism"

You've got that backwards.
The Globalists are of the Left, not those who support free markets.


3 'capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.'
The culture that I endorse is one of freedom.
It is what the Founders promised: individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

The six I named earlier are founded on the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


Here is the difference, pictorially:
clip_image001.jpg
clip_image001.jpg
"Freedom" is not a culture, it is an ideal.

If you allow people to do whatever the hell they want they will just become mindless "progressives" who destroy the very country that gave them that freedom.

Capitalism is just a suicide pact.



Nonsense.
 
Sweden was just fine before they became total cuckolds, and they weren't even utilizing the best aspects of socialism.



Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people is far better than anything capitalism can do. Good people just don't usually end up in government.

The end-game for capitalism is oblivion btw.

"An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people..."

Protect them from what?

The Nazis were all powerful and socialist.

Protected the people??????
From demons like ISIS, just like European nations used to do.

BTW, nazism is literally the only reason Germany ever became a world power.

Hitler's Germany was also vastly superior to Merkel's, and that is even with Hitler being insane.
 
Sorry.....gotta dispute that, too.

Sweden was just what the Progressives planned for America.

As reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997,Washington Post,

From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers.

Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish Minister of Health and Social Affairs, told the Post that "there was nothing secret about the sterilization program. It was carried out in the light of public debate at a time when Swedes believed they were creating a society that would be the envy of the world." The Swedish Institute for Racial Biology, founded in 1922, was the first national institute of the kind. The Swedes were also the first to sterilize the mentally ill, beginning in 1934.

One woman, aged 72 at the time of the Post article, was sterilized "because she couldn't read a blackboard because she did not have eyeglasses and was deemed to be retarded."


The Irish Times of August 30, 1997, meanwhile, reports that "90 per cent of [those sterilizied] were women," and that "the practice, which predated and outlived Nazi Germany, started as an attempt to weed out perceived genetic weaknesses, mental or physical defectsand ended as a method of social control." According to Professor Gunnar Broberg, "Young girls were told they would be set free from [mental] homes and prisons ‘if we are allowed to make you calmer.'"


Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families:

Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small.

In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether "lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals."

Sweden also "forced hundreds of ‘mentally deficient' Swedes to let their teeth rot after being force-fed candy in dental experiments."

The allegedly "benevolent" Swedish social democrats, then, behaved very like the Nazis.
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people is far better than anything capitalism can do. Good people just don't usually end up in government.

The end-game for capitalism is oblivion btw.

"An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people..."

Protect them from what?

The Nazis were all powerful and socialist.

Protected the people??????
From demons like ISIS, just like European nations used to do.

BTW, nazism is literally the only reason Germany ever became a world power.

Hitler's Germany was also vastly superior to Merkel's, and that is even with Hitler being insane.


More nonsense.




Only one guy in a sea of socialists and Nazis.
See if you can find him.

enhanced-buzz-1610-1352999991-16.jpg
 
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.


'Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006


In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Although I am not a Marxist, I definitely see that capitalism is failing now.

Once Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism, capitalism won't produce shit anymore.

It is all about the culture, and capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.


1. " I definitely see that capitalism is failing now."

Where? Certainly not in regulation-encumbered America.

2. "Hispanics and Arabs take over the west at the behest of globalist-geared capitalism"

You've got that backwards.
The Globalists are of the Left, not those who support free markets.


3 'capitalism does nothing but destroy culture in the end.'
The culture that I endorse is one of freedom.
It is what the Founders promised: individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

The six I named earlier are founded on the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


Here is the difference, pictorially:
clip_image001.jpg
clip_image001.jpg
"Freedom" is not a culture, it is an ideal.

If you allow people to do whatever the hell they want they will just become mindless "progressives" who destroy the very country that gave them that freedom.

Capitalism is just a suicide pact.



Nonsense.
Is that not why Republicans had to use the "nuclear option" just to get a sane judge on the nation's highest court today?

This country is coming apart.
 
Socialism depends on who is running it to decide its morality.

Capitalism is always fucking people over and then claiming it doesn't. Capitalism is the reason why Sweden is a fucking hellhole now. Sweden wanted to be "diverse" like America and so they opened up their borders to the money and the shittiest aspects of American culture.




There is no difference in the end-game planned for society by any of these six:
Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism, ......or Socialism.

All demand the bending of the neck and the knee to all powerful government.
An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people is far better than anything capitalism can do. Good people just don't usually end up in government.

The end-game for capitalism is oblivion btw.

"An all powerful government that uses its power to protect the people..."

Protect them from what?

The Nazis were all powerful and socialist.

Protected the people??????
From demons like ISIS, just like European nations used to do.

BTW, nazism is literally the only reason Germany ever became a world power.

Hitler's Germany was also vastly superior to Merkel's, and that is even with Hitler being insane.


More nonsense.




Only one guy in a sea of socialists and Nazis.
See if you can find him.

enhanced-buzz-1610-1352999991-16.jpg
Do you want me to illustrate Merkel's Germany for you?

Oh wait, the news does that every time a Muslim "German national" decides to shoot up a public square.
 
It's one of those things, Noam may represent the better angels of our mercy, or just be another hyper critical neurotic defeatist. So far I still like him.
 
The Left's Dark Prince, the lying anti-American, anti-Semite genius Noam Chomsky......well,....
Chomsky thinks you're a joke if you believe the Democrat Trump/Putin Collusion Thesis.


Never thought I'd be quoting this villain....but this is good:

1. "During a recent interview with Democracy Now, Noam Chomsky demonstrated what everyone with a clear head and capacity for critical thought should already know. Just because you have a strong dislike for Donald Trump, doesn’t mean you latch on like a lunatic to every nonsensical Russia conspiracy theory because you’re still crying about Hillary’s loss.

2 NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s a pretty remarkable fact that—first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships.

3. Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.




4. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump’s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That’s—the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed.

5. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can’t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, “Sure, that’s just what they ought to be doing.”




6. So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That’s not a major issue.

Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it."
Noam Chomsky Calls Democrats' Obsession With Russia Conspiracy Theories "A Joke" | Zero Hedge


OMG!!!

Noam Chomsky.....a semi-rational Liberal!!!!

Alice in Wonderland:
Curiouser and curiouser.
Ya know a CONservative has gone off the rails when they call a JEW an anti semite! ROFLMAO!



How about I simply call you an imbecile?

And now....show you why you should never doubt me:

Chomsky On Jews and Israel

  • “I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the holocaust. Nor would there be anti-Semitic implications, per se, in the claim that the holocaust (whether one believes it took place or not) is being exploited, viciously so, by apologists for Israeli repression and violence.”[9]
  • “The Hebrew press is much more open than the English language press, and there’s a very obvious reason: Hebrew is a secret language, you only read it if you’re inside the tribe.” [10]
  • “The point is, these organizations [Anti-Defamation League] don’t ultimately care about anti-Semitism, what they care about is opposition to the policies of Israel-in fact, opposition to their own hawkish version of the policies of Israel.”[11]
  • “I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state.”[12]
  • Israel is “a state based on the principle of discrimination. There is no other way for a state with non-Jewish citizens to remain a Jewish state…”[13]
  • “Israel is virtually a US military base, an offshoot of the US military system.”[14]
  • “There are a great many horrible regimes in the world. To take just one, the world's longest military occupation. There's little doubt that those under the military occupation would be much better off if the occupation were terminated. Does it follow that we should bomb Tel Aviv?” [15]
  • “Of course [suicide bombers are] terrorists and there's been Palestinian terrorism all the way through. I have always opposed it….But it's very small as compared with the US-backed Israeli terrorism.”[16]
  • Compares Palestinians to African Americans in the South: “I mean you’d have to go back to the worst days of the American South to know what it’s been like for the Palestinians in the occupied territories.”[17]
  • On War of Independence: Arab states were “reluctant” to enter war and the war “was to a large extent not directed against Israel. Of course, they didn’t want the State of Israel around either, and they opposed it-but that was probably a minor consideration in the attack; really a minor consideration, actually.”[18]
  • “What this wall is really doing is…helping turn Palestinian communities into dungeons, next to which the bantustans of South Africa look like symbols of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination.”[19]
9] Chomsky letter cited in W.D. Rubinstein, “Chomsky and the Neo-Nazis,” Quadrant (Australia), October 1981, pp. 8-14; also cited in Werner Cohn, “Chomsky and Holocaust Denial,” The Anti-Chomsky Reader, Collier and Horowitz (editors), 2004, pp. 129-130.

[10] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[11] p. 52, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky

[12] Soloman, Deborah. Questions for Noam Chomsky: The Ultimate Procovator. THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: 11-02-03: QUESTIONS FOR NOAM CHOMSKY; The Professorial Provocateur

[13] Noam Chomsky, Peace in the Middle East?, 1975 p. 37

[14] Noam Chomsky, “Anti-Semitism, Zionism and the Palestinians,” Video hook up lecture to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, October 11 2002, Transcript archived at variant.ndtilda.co.uk

[15] Interview with Noam Chomsky, “Chomsky on War,” Znet Magazine, March 31 2003 at http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=3357

[16] Chomsky Interview, Znet, Australia, April 8 2002 at http://www.zmag.org/content/Mideast/chomlateline.cfm

[17] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p. 124, online at www.understandingpower.com/

[18] Peter Mitchell and Paul Shoeffel (eds), Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, p.132 online at www.understandingpower.com/

[19] Noam Chomsky, “The Wall as a Weapon,” New York Times Op Ed, February 23 2004




In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeee!!!!!
Chomsky is still a Jew. Also being CRITICAL of the terrorist state doesn't equal anti semitism snowflake.



WHAT?????

You need yet another verbal custard pie smashed in your kisser????



No prob.


"Of a pattern with this animus toward Israel is Chomsky’s involvement with neo-Nazis and Holocaust revisionism. This saga began in 1980 with Chomsky’s support of Robert Faurisson, a French anti-Semite who was fired by the University of Lyon for his hate-filled screeds. (“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie,” Faurisson wrote.) Chomsky penned a preface to a book by Faurisson, explaining that the latter was an “apolitical liberal” whose work was based on “extensive historical research” and contained “no hint of anti-Semitic implications.” http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/noamchomskyprofile.html
Psttttt he is STILL a jew! Damn you are dense. Questioning so called holohoax is part of history so....Oh but hey thanks for giving me a book to look up!
 
It's one of those things, Noam may represent the better angels of our mercy, or just be another hyper critical neurotic defeatist. So far I still like him.
He is neither.

He is a psychopath who is trying to kill off the only element of this country that is trying to maintain stability and peace just so America can become officially socialist.
 
It's one of those things, Noam may represent the better angels of our mercy, or just be another hyper critical neurotic defeatist. So far I still like him.
He is neither.

He is a psychopath who is trying to kill off the only element of this country that is trying to maintain stability and peace just so America can become officially socialist.
Chomsky never advocated harm to anyone. It's a fact. he wants us to look at how our government works in toto. Vietnam to Iraq.
 
It's one of those things, Noam may represent the better angels of our mercy, or just be another hyper critical neurotic defeatist. So far I still like him.
He is neither.

He is a psychopath who is trying to kill off the only element of this country that is trying to maintain stability and peace just so America can become officially socialist.
Chomsky never advocated harm to anyone. It's a fact. he wants us to look at how our government works in toto. Vietnam to Iraq.
He supports the rioters and condemns law and order.

That is condemning people to die, or at least live in perpetual fear.
 

Forum List

Back
Top