Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,304
- 810
- 140
" Eponymous Genetic Religions Nomian Legal Systems *
* When Racemization Is Ritually Bound With Land *
The pinning of a badge on another as a " racist " in an attempt to triumph in a debate is out of scope for a question for whether fictional ishmaelism does or does not violate non aggression principles .
These circumstances require rigor and not simply objectivity with practiced ignorance , and in deed informed consent is great in value .
The genetic religion of torahnism is bound with the city state of israel and an expectation that public policy for its nomain legal system is that it is neither intended nor incumbent upon any region or demographic extant of that city state , whence those descendants from an eponymous patriarch are remanded to assimilate and to establish a religious polity by name ; and , any directives for violence are limited in scope to that end .
Given that torahnism and qurayshism are kindred religions from the same patriarch but differ in matriarchs , qurayshism does not apply outside of hejaz .
Now , if qurayshism is supposed to apply outside of hejaz , that is fictional ishmaelism , then the implicit and inextricable violent directives to establish its religious polity by name are no longer limited in scope for the city state of hejaz ; and , any subject to the same is entitled to invoke a legitimate tort in self defense .
Whence , #i_slam_a_phobia is the paranoia and delusion invoked for over 1400 years to defend hejaz when it was not ever under duress .
As numbers translate into votes and public policy , citizenship should not be extended to those with tenets of creed that violate non aggression principles .
* When Racemization Is Ritually Bound With Land *
Would a strict definition for categorical racism necessarily include threats for , or acts of , illegitimate aggression , which constitute violence by definition as per non aggression principles , and any subject to the same is entitled to invoke a legitimate tort in self defense .Why? You don’t deny it.Then quote me. I'll wait.I know you are a racist. Do you?Do you even know what a race is? It has nothing to do with believing in an invisible being.They are if you hate them for it, dummy.Still not a race.
The pinning of a badge on another as a " racist " in an attempt to triumph in a debate is out of scope for a question for whether fictional ishmaelism does or does not violate non aggression principles .
These circumstances require rigor and not simply objectivity with practiced ignorance , and in deed informed consent is great in value .
The genetic religion of torahnism is bound with the city state of israel and an expectation that public policy for its nomain legal system is that it is neither intended nor incumbent upon any region or demographic extant of that city state , whence those descendants from an eponymous patriarch are remanded to assimilate and to establish a religious polity by name ; and , any directives for violence are limited in scope to that end .
Given that torahnism and qurayshism are kindred religions from the same patriarch but differ in matriarchs , qurayshism does not apply outside of hejaz .
Now , if qurayshism is supposed to apply outside of hejaz , that is fictional ishmaelism , then the implicit and inextricable violent directives to establish its religious polity by name are no longer limited in scope for the city state of hejaz ; and , any subject to the same is entitled to invoke a legitimate tort in self defense .
Whence , #i_slam_a_phobia is the paranoia and delusion invoked for over 1400 years to defend hejaz when it was not ever under duress .
As numbers translate into votes and public policy , citizenship should not be extended to those with tenets of creed that violate non aggression principles .
Last edited: