At least you acknowledge your nonsense to be nonsense by positing in the correct forum.The building was on fire, had huge holes in it from pieces of the WTC and/or airplanes hitting #7, all kinds of conflicting reports were coming out of the press, and reporters just get stuff wrong all the time.
But reporting a collapse that doesn't actually happen for some 20 minutes later? Seems very odd to me.
Not all conspiracy theories are nonsense.
Probably true-----can you cite one that is not nonsense?
Would it matter? If you already hold a preconceived notion that all conspiracy theories are nonsense, there isn't much point in discussing particular theories with you. Been down that road too many times. Most are all-in on Government/Corporate Media narratives. They refuse to acknowledge any other possibilities.
I've found that many even get very angry at those daring to question Government/Corporate Media narratives. They feel a desperate need to protect their Government and Media. It only leads to arguments and the ole stale 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. I mostly just post stuff here for fellow conspiracy buffs. I enjoy it. But if you really are interested in conspiracy theories, there's plenty of sites you can check out some great docs. Take the red pill and go for it. We'll talk later.
yes---it would matter. Why are you RELUCTANT??? How can anyone discuss
CONSPIRACY THEORIES "in general" I am a great "doc" I have found
not a single one of the 9-11 conspiracy theories to have any validity at all-----inclueing the silly "TERMITE" thing