Why Hillary Lost

[Spare_change]

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

 

[owebo]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

 

[BULLDOG]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

Gotta add that last lie to your remark, don't you? We both know it was just barely, and certainly not overwhelming. Are you capable of making a completely true statement?

 

[owebo]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

Gotta add that last lie to your remark, don't you? We both know it was just barely, and certainly not overwhelming. Are you capable of making a completely true statement?

It was a pleasant mandate America have Trump.....

 

[BULLDOG]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

Gotta add that last lie to your remark, don't you? We both know it was just barely, and certainly not overwhelming. Are you capable of making a completely true statement?

It was a pleasant mandate America have Trump.....

Yep, you just can't hep yourself. There was no mandate.

 

[owebo]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

Gotta add that last lie to your remark, don't you? We both know it was just barely, and certainly not overwhelming. Are you capable of making a completely true statement?

It was a pleasant mandate America have Trump.....

Yep, you just can't hep yourself. There was no mandate.

Let's recap:

Hillary = fascist
America = rejected Hillary
Trump = won with mandate
You = sad snowflake

 

[xband]

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

John Wesley started the conservative Methodist Church and we used the King James Revised Edition of the Bible.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Simple....She was a democrat fascist and America rejected her overwhelmingly.....

Gotta add that last lie to your remark, don't you? We both know it was just barely, and certainly not overwhelming. Are you capable of making a completely true statement?

It was a pleasant mandate America have Trump.....

Yep, you just can't hep yourself. There was no mandate.

Yes there was!

 

[fncceo]

Yep, you just can't hep yourself. There was no mandate.

I feel pretty mandated.

 

[Yesyayah]

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

She lost the Electoral Vote because America is a backwards, misogynist nation employing double standards when a female candidate is running. Male politicians lie, cheat, steal, sexually abuse women.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

 

[Moonglow]

Yep, you just can't hep yourself. There was no mandate.

I feel pretty mandated.

That's mendacity..

 

[Yesyayah]

She lost the electoral college - but won the Popular Vote - because we still live in a backwards, misogynist, male dominated country! Male politicians LIE, are corrupt and sexually demean women...but it't ok because the Good Ole Boys Club is in power. Sickening and Archaic! The White House is full of white haired, old redneck billionaires

 

[owebo]

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

She lost the Electoral Vote because America is a backwards, misogynist nation employing double standards when a female candidate is running. Male politicians lie, cheat, steal, sexually abuse women.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

Link that Hillary is a woman?

 

[owebo]

She lost the electoral college - but won the Popular Vote - because we still live in a backwards, misogynist, male dominated country! Male politicians LIE, are corrupt and sexually demean women...but it't ok because the Good Ole Boys Club is in power. Sickening and Archaic! The White House is full of white haired, old redneck billionaires

What did she win?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

 

[xband]

She lost the electoral college - but won the Popular Vote - because we still live in a backwards, misogynist, male dominated country! Male politicians LIE, are corrupt and sexually demean women...but it't ok because the Good Ole Boys Club is in power. Sickening and Archaic! The White House is full of white haired, old redneck billionaires

What did she win?

Hillary was put out to pasture and retirement is something to look forward to. If I had Hillary's money would have servants to bring me beer and smoke in my posh pleasure palace.

 

[fncceo]

because we still live in a backwards, misogynist, male dominated country!

Thank goodness!

 

[fncceo]

What did she win?

Anything from the first row.

 

[xband]

What did she win?

Anything from the first row.

A gambler's money has no home. From the peanut gallery.

 

[Meathead]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Trump still would have won, but then math probably isn't your "thing".