Why Hillary Lost

[Meathead]

Reagan once said that he didn't leave the Democrat party, the Democrat party left him.

That's exactly what happened, again.

 

[Meane]

The American public was manipulated to take double Putin - but isn't that what they've always wanted, the ignorant lot? Maybe instead of always thinking, when it comes to it, America - Russia, Russia - America, take example of other countries in between them and having trouble dealing with them both; such as Germany, Turkey, Iran, Israel, England or China.

 

[owebo]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

 

[xband]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

Democrats lack a contingency plan and when plan A don't work they cry their eyes out instead of moving on to plan B.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

No one gets a mandate when they lose the popular vote.

Or when you won't acknowledge that Obama had a mandate, TWICE.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

Democrats lack a contingency plan and when plan A don't work they cry their eyes out instead of moving on to plan B.

The pendulum is already swinging back towards the Democrats. Trump's approval is down to a number that GW Bush took 5 years to get to. And we know what happened to Bush in 2006.

 

[owebo]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

No one gets a mandate when they lose the popular vote.

Or when you won't acknowledge that Obama had a mandate, TWICE.

Your Obama is gone.....at least you admit Trump won with a resounding mandate....

 

[xband]

Mathematically, she lost because a few thousand votes in 2 or 3 states moved 35 electoral votes to Trump.

Hillary lost the historic blue Wall? The hell you say......

What a resounding mandate for Trump!!!!

Democrats lack a contingency plan and when plan A don't work they cry their eyes out instead of moving on to plan B.

The pendulum is already swinging back towards the Democrats. Trump's approval is down to a number that GW Bush took 5 years to get to. And we know what happened to Bush in 2006.

The pendulum rests at bottom dead center unless kick started. Reminds me of bisecting the hypotenuse of a right triangle.

 

[SavannahMann]

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

She lost the Electoral Vote because America is a backwards, misogynist nation employing double standards when a female candidate is running. Male politicians lie, cheat, steal, sexually abuse women.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

Hillary Clinton was not an ideal presidential candidate. We don't need a poll to tell us this, but some post-election clarity from The Wesleyan Media Project doesn't hurt.

In their survey, Wesleyan notes that Clinton's failing to show up in some key swing states, taking the "Blue Wall" for granted, surely cost her votes, but other factors were at play that can explain her brutal defeat to Donald Trump, at least in terms of the electoral college.

To put it bluntly, the Clinton team really blew it when it came to their ad campaigns. Instead of promoting and outlining their policy agenda, the campaign decided to go largely negative and launch character attacks on Donald Trump. While Trump's ads focused on his plans for the economy, Clinton's ads hammered him on his controversial remarks about women. These types of personal attacks, like that seen in the ad "Role Models," amounted to 90 percent of Clinton's negative ads. Only 30 percent of her ads promoted her own policies.

In contrast, When Trump ads went negative against Clinton, the majority of them (70 percent) made sure to mention at least some policy.

“Message matters, and a message repeated endlessly does no good unless it resonates with a sufficient number of the right voters,” the Wesleyan authors said. “Team Clinton’s message that Trump was unfit for the presidency may not have been enough.”
-----------------------------------------------

But, but, but .... I thought it was the Russians!

Or, was it a video? Oh wait -no. That was Benghazi!

It was probably the lies .... you know, her lies.

Then why does Hillary's message get less positive reaction when a man says it?

Academics swapped gender of Trump, Clinton for restaged presidential debate and the results surprised them - Hot Air

It appears from the reactions of the crowd that the Hillary Supporters were the Sexists. They didn't care what Hillary said. All they cared was that she had an innie and not an outie.

 

[easyt65]

Why?

She sucked - worst candidate in US history.

Next thread....