tyroneweaver
Platinum Member
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day: X 365 days = 365 million retirees in one year ... Link ?
anyway, even just one retiree a year, collecting their earned SS is to much for the wingnuts to comprehend.
why would retirement skew "employment" no.s ?
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Not all of those people are retiring at that age, but yes, it does largely debunk the "doesn't even keep up with population growth" myth.
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Not all of those people are retiring at that age, but yes, it does largely debunk the "doesn't even keep up with population growth" myth.
are you claiming that there are more people retiring each year than there are new workers entering the work force? really? you cannot be serious.
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day: X 365 days = 365 million retirees in one year ... Link ?
anyway, even just one retiree a year, collecting their earned SS is to much for the wingnuts to comprehend.
why would retirement skew "employment" no.s ?
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Not all of those people are retiring at that age, but yes, it does largely debunk the "doesn't even keep up with population growth" myth.
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
Not all of those people are retiring at that age, but yes, it does largely debunk the "doesn't even keep up with population growth" myth.
No, it doesn't. While it's true the participation rate has steadily decreased, it isn't because of retirees leaving the workforce. Indeed, those over 55 have seen their participation rate steadily increase over the last few decades. It's those younger than 55 who have been leaving the workforce and have seen their participation rate decrease. Unless you're completely dishonest, you're going to have a hard time arguing that the reason the latter group's participation rate has decreased is because of them retiring.
Civilian labor force participation rates by age, sex, race, and ethnicity
The Increasing Labor Force Participation of Older Workers and its Effect on the Income of the Aged
Throughout this entire "recovery", the biggest "winners" have been older Americans while the biggest "losers" have been younger Americans, especially those under 30.
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day: X 365 days = 365 million retirees in one year ... Link ?
anyway, even just one retiree a year, collecting their earned SS is to much for the wingnuts to comprehend.
why would retirement skew "employment" no.s ?
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day
Doesn't this skew the employment numbers
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day: X 365 days = 365 million retirees in one year ... Link ?
anyway, even just one retiree a year, collecting their earned SS is to much for the wingnuts to comprehend.
why would retirement skew "employment" no.s ?
Because they're dropping out of the workforce.
That's why I pondered how many are Joining the workforce, daily
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day
with 10000 baby boomers entering SS age each day: X 365 days = 365 million retirees in one year ... Link ?
anyway, even just one retiree a year, collecting their earned SS is to much for the wingnuts to comprehend.
why would retirement skew "employment" no.s ?
Because they're dropping out of the workforce.
That's why I pondered how many are Joining the workforce, daily
Unfortunately, as many of these people retire, not all of those positions are being filled with replacements. That is in great part due to the fact that companies are still cutting costs because demand still hasn't picked up enough to justify keeping everyone on. It is changing slowly but this is a big part of the problem.
What people don't understand is that these retirees are downsizing and buying a lot less than they did ten years ago. Even the ones who are not ready to retire are cutting back on their spending. This has caused a loss in demand for many goods and services and is at the heart of our economic stagnation. It is going to change though, because we have 75 million young people between the age of 20 and 35 who will be starting their own families very soon. As that happens, we are going to see a lot of growth in the economy.