Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She kept telling this poor woman that it was okay and there was nothing to worry about. She then reported her to police for "abuse of a corpse".I must have missed it,,
what did she lie about??
That itself is a lie. Police have to tell the truth under penalty of perjury.
She didn't lie to the police. The woman herself admitted to throwing the fetus in a bucket and putting it out in the backyard.That's what I was referring to. I see the detective shouldn't be condemned since he does what is allowed in his profession, but that the nurse who reported this woman should be fired and prosecuted for lying to the police.
She didn't lie to the police. The woman herself admitted to throwing the fetus in a bucket and putting it out in the backyard.
I think youre over thinking it,,So this changes things. If she told the nurse that she did that, that is abuse of a corpse. Watts is denying that, of course, but who do you believe in such a politically tainted situation? OP says believe the woman, for A) Being a woman suffering from the Roe decision, and B) probably for being black and part of a racial demographic that is claimed to be disproportionately affected by the decision.
The other side says believe the Nurse and the police. The thing that gets me here is that the report by the nurse about Watts' statements has not been corroborated. Not. You have a nurse making the claim Watts made those statements. And then you have where the fetus was found, in the toilet pipes. That goes directly against what the nurse claimed in her report. Something is afoot with this nurse. How could the fetus be in the pipes but not in the bucket like the nurse is claiming Watts did?
I have been known to overthink. I'd rather be accused of that than the opposite.I think youre over thinking it,,
we may never know all the details but I doubt shes going to be railroaded knowing what we do know,,
So this changes things. If she told the nurse that she did that, that is abuse of a corpse. Watts is denying that, of course, but who do you believe in such a politically tainted situation? OP says believe the woman, for A) Being a woman suffering from the Roe decision, and B) probably for being black and part of a racial demographic that is claimed to be disproportionately affected by the decision.
The other side says believe the Nurse and the police. The thing that gets me here is that the report by the nurse about Watts' statements has not been corroborated. Not. You have a nurse making the claim Watts made those statements. And then you have where the fetus was found, in the toilet pipes. That goes directly against what the nurse claimed in her report. Something is afoot with this nurse. How could the fetus be in the pipes but not in the bucket like the nurse is claiming Watts did?
I am curious about the claim the hospital made her wait because they were concerned about legal issue,,I have been known to overthink. I'd rather be accused of that than the opposite.
the only concern is the dead babys body,, the nurse had nothing to do with thatIn sum, this case is one big, fat, giant, colossal clusterf**k. Someone is not telling the truth between Watts and the nurse. Whoever it is needs to be punished nonetheless.
Fair enough. Just wondering about the discrepancy in the fetus' location at the time investigators found it. Finding it in the pipes suggests to me Watts tried to flush it down the commode. If that's the case (and I do say IF), the charges against her are justified.the only concern is the dead babys body,, the nurse had nothing to do with that
sounds like they found it in both places,,Fair enough. Just wondering about the discrepancy in the fetus' location at the time investigators found it. Finding it in the pipes suggests to me Watts tried to flush it down the commode. If that's the case (and I do say IF), the charges against her are justified.
In sum, this case is one big, fat, giant, colossal clusterf**k. Someone is not telling the truth between Watts and the nurse. Whoever it is needs to be punished nonetheless.
Ahhh. That makes sense. Watts may have thought she scooped the fetus into the bucket, she unknowingly tried to flush it.sounds like they found it in both places,,
the way I read it she scooped out what she couldnt flush and put it in a bucket and left it outback,,,,
See my post 230 for detail.So this changes things. If she told the nurse that she did that, that is abuse of a corpse. Watts is denying that, of course, but who do you believe in such a politically tainted situation? OP says believe the woman, for A) Being a woman suffering from the Roe decision, and B) probably for being black and part of a racial demographic that is claimed to be disproportionately affected by the decision.
The other side says believe the Nurse and the police. The thing that gets me here is that the report by the nurse about Watts' statements has not been corroborated. Not. You have a nurse making the claim Watts made those statements. And then you have where the fetus was found, in the toilet pipes. That goes directly against what the nurse claimed in her report. Something is afoot with this nurse. How could the fetus be in the pipes but not in the bucket like the nurse is claiming Watts did?
Who did you call? Some people just call the funeral home. If you buried the bodies in the garden you broke the law.We didn't call 911 for our parents. Thats stupid.
Fair enough.See my post 230 for detail.
At the time Watts told the nurse she didn't want a child. Now she's grieving the loss of her baby.A Black Ohio woman was charged with a felony after a miscarriage at home
Ohio was in a bitter debate over abortion rights this fall when Brittany Watts, 21 weeks and 5 days pregnant, began passing thick blood clots.www.dispatch.com
She committed a crime. Felony abuse of a corpse. She should claim she was confused and ask for mercy.
The actual Ohio statute is Section 3705.20 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Of course she should not be fired. For one thing, she was absolutely correct. As far as the miscarriage itself goes, the woman had nothing to worry about. She was not facing any criminal charge. It was for abusing the corpse. The woman may not have known such a crime existed.She kept telling this poor woman that it was okay and there was nothing to worry about. She then reported her to police for "abuse of a corpse".
She indirectly lied to police by misleading this woman, I should say. Regardless, she should be fired.
