Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CO NV NM AZ UT will decide the election, I think.As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
I've posted this before and still waiting for ONE right winger to tell me how Trump could win.
The first thing that a right winger would have to do, is to "argue" if the following states would opt for Trump and not for Clinton. The "blue" states are:
WA, OR, CA, CO, NM.....MN, WI, MI, IL, .....NY, PA, VA....Vt, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC.....
If the above 20 (plus DC) DO go for Clinton.....then she has 272 EC votes.
Trump can carry even those battleground states like FL, OH, NC, NV, etc.....and he would STILL only total 264 EC votes......
NOTE THAT I GAVE TRUMP FLORIDA AND NC
Any arguments as to who will declare victory on the night of Nov. 8th?
Sounds like a fun time.With my brothers and sisters, and about 80 grandchildren amongst us, at the family lodge near Park City. We rent it out the rest of the time. I wish our parents were alive.Christmas has always been a fun holiday for me. I usually spend that time with family or taking trips.Bet you loved Christmas.As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
Virginia, there is something you need to be told . . .
How do celebrate Christmas, Jake?
I first predicted a Trump win back in June of last year. Several people thought I was nuts for thinking that. lolAs I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
I've posted this before and still waiting for ONE right winger to tell me how Trump could win.
The first thing that a right winger would have to do, is to "argue" if the following states would opt for Trump and not for Clinton. The "blue" states are:
WA, OR, CA, CO, NM.....MN, WI, MI, IL, .....NY, PA, VA....Vt, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC.....
If the above 20 (plus DC) DO go for Clinton.....then she has 272 EC votes.
Trump can carry even those battleground states like FL, OH, NC, NV, etc.....and he would STILL only total 264 EC votes......
NOTE THAT I GAVE TRUMP FLORIDA AND NC
Any arguments as to who will declare victory on the night of Nov. 8th?
As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
I've posted this before and still waiting for ONE right winger to tell me how Trump could win.
The first thing that a right winger would have to do, is to "argue" if the following states would opt for Trump and not for Clinton. The "blue" states are:
WA, OR, CA, CO, NM.....MN, WI, MI, IL, .....NY, PA, VA....Vt, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC.....
If the above 20 (plus DC) DO go for Clinton.....then she has 272 EC votes.
Trump can carry even those battleground states like FL, OH, NC, NV, etc.....and he would STILL only total 264 EC votes......
NOTE THAT I GAVE TRUMP FLORIDA AND NC
Any arguments as to who will declare victory on the night of Nov. 8th?
Tell her, go aheadBet you loved Christmas.As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
Virginia, there is something you need to be told . . .
I don't usually do this but....BWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.A sign of the beat down you're about to receive!
Six days before Election Day in 2012, Democrats in Florida had cast about 39,000 more votes than Republicans. Today, six days before Election Day 2016, Republicans have cast about 17,000 more votes than Democrats
Early vote trend favoring GOP in Florida
A. of course the assumption from right wing idiots is that ALL republicans would vote for the clown.
B. Look at the electoral map and you too (well maybe, since you're an idiot) can see that Clinton does NOT need FL to win.
C. Talk to us when Trump is clearly winning states like WI and MI....until then, go take a nap.
CO NV NM AZ UT will decide the election, I think.As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
I've posted this before and still waiting for ONE right winger to tell me how Trump could win.
The first thing that a right winger would have to do, is to "argue" if the following states would opt for Trump and not for Clinton. The "blue" states are:
WA, OR, CA, CO, NM.....MN, WI, MI, IL, .....NY, PA, VA....Vt, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC.....
If the above 20 (plus DC) DO go for Clinton.....then she has 272 EC votes.
Trump can carry even those battleground states like FL, OH, NC, NV, etc.....and he would STILL only total 264 EC votes......
NOTE THAT I GAVE TRUMP FLORIDA AND NC
Any arguments as to who will declare victory on the night of Nov. 8th?
But if HRC takes FL or OH or NC, the election is over before 8PM EDT.
I was right. She did not, the election was not over. You are simply stupid.CO NV NM AZ UT will decide the election, I think.As I've said many times before.... Trump is going to be our next president.
I've posted this before and still waiting for ONE right winger to tell me how Trump could win.
The first thing that a right winger would have to do, is to "argue" if the following states would opt for Trump and not for Clinton. The "blue" states are:
WA, OR, CA, CO, NM.....MN, WI, MI, IL, .....NY, PA, VA....Vt, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC.....
If the above 20 (plus DC) DO go for Clinton.....then she has 272 EC votes.
Trump can carry even those battleground states like FL, OH, NC, NV, etc.....and he would STILL only total 264 EC votes......
NOTE THAT I GAVE TRUMP FLORIDA AND NC
Any arguments as to who will declare victory on the night of Nov. 8th?
But if HRC takes FL or OH or NC, the election is over before 8PM EDT.
Malarkey never stops bringing teh stoopid, does he??
Yikes, not the right thread to be trying that oneYou are simply stupid.
Everyone should take the time to read Nat's posts, they are formed/formatted from a standard operating procedure that he still uses now, same logic, same language, same results.
Sure, it is: correcting the dumbos is a good thing. What I said was true. She did not take those states, so the election was not over.Yikes, not the right thread to be trying that oneYou are simply stupid.
And you thought this was what needed correcting in this thread?...seems to me if this is a good thing, you could achieve some great things in this threadSure, it is: correcting the dumbos is a good thing. What I said was true.Yikes, not the right thread to be trying that oneYou are simply stupid.
CORRECTION:She did not take those states, so the election was not over.
It would not have been over "BEFORE 8PM EDT" if she took FL or OH or NCBut if HRC takes FL or OH or NC the election is over before 8PM EDT.