Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 14,625
- 4,879
- 210
You mean "I can" -- given you're determined enough to refer back to a 25-year-old document as though it could simply be presumed NASA's position today and don't care one iota about horribly mixing apples with oranges.You can get any position YOU WANT out of a govt science agency dude. Here's the cogent example ALSO FROM NASA.
Accurate "Thermometers" in Space | Science Mission Directorate
science.nasa.gov
Me? Sorry, I don't waste my time entertaining silly notions like Gee, "CLIMATE.NASA" and "SCIENCE.NASA" must be at odds! I look up stuff like "Global Warming" to what international climate scientists really mean by the term and how it's measured instead. How they gather the global surface air temperature (SAT) and sea surface temperature (SST) data actually involved.. obviously neither of which depend upon satellite data. Not that there's anything inherently wrong with weather data satellites. They just haven't been around all that long. But you know all this too. You're not stupid. You just enjoy pretending to be. Well, whatever floats your dinghy there, fella. If it takes incessant denial to get you out of bed in the morning, more power to ya.Disclaimer: This page is kept for historical purposes, but the content is no longer actively updated. For more on NASA Science, visit https://science.nasa.gov.
Published:
Oct 5, 1997