Staggering climate contradiction - data that can be fudged says "warming," data that cannot be fudged says "no warming"

Bet your arse. I parrot NASA, you parrot idiots and links you’re ashamed to post.



Then your ability to READ is in question...



90% of Earth ice has grown EVERY YEAR since your Co2 FRAUD started, and millions of years before that...



As for the "ocean rise," here is where the IPCC got caught FUDGING and LYING yet again...


“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some

SERIOUS ONGOING FUDGEBAKING FRAUD AT IPCC and that ALSO EXPLAINS why DAG cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO OF "ocean rise..."
 
No, I just made the case that you’re too ignorant to ask a question about AGW let alone understand an answer.
No, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!

You’re the best!!

Thank you!!
 
Then your ability to READ is in question...



90% of Earth ice has grown EVERY YEAR since your Co2 FRAUD started, and millions of years before that...



As for the "ocean rise," here is where the IPCC got caught FUDGING and LYING yet again...


“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some

SERIOUS ONGOING FUDGEBAKING FRAUD AT IPCC and that ALSO EXPLAINS why DAG cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO OF "ocean rise..."
Hilarious
No, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!

You’re the best!!

Thank you!!
you're funny, YOU CANT EVEN READ YOUR OWN SHIT.
THIS PAGE CONTAINS OUTDATED MATERIAL…
LIKE YOU, ITS A FRAUD
 
No, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!

You’re the best!!

Thank you!!
You never asked an intelligent question….do you still beat your wife ? You can‘t read can you. You have my sympathy
 
You‘re a supporter of white nationalism and the continued flow of money from rich oil producers that supports anti AGW. It’s a faction that also supports a return to a Christian based gov though few of you actually practice Christian values. Its demonstrated by the simple fact that all institutions of higher education in the world along with the religious leaders of ALL the major religions support AGW.
But, you don’t and you lie and fraud your way through your continued denial.
Actually I'm an atheist/agnostic and with the varied racial and ethnic mix in my family, hardly a "white nationalist".
Like so many things, this another you get wrong and fail totally at.
As for the CO2 Coalition, the following page of members shows over 170 with degrees in sciences and engineering, many M.D. and Ph. D.; any one of which knows more than you ever have or will.

You are just a shill spewing rhetoric and propaganda and don't understand most of what you are saying or supporting.

 
You’ll never know. But that won’t keep you from making up shit about people. You delirous deniers do it
all the time.
"delirous (sp. delirious :rolleyes:) deniers" are ones like you who can't do the math or science and are willing to believe those who use fraud to advance your political agenda.
 
Being totally oblivious to what AGW is about, means your posts are irrelevant…it’s about the rate at which the warming trend is occurring, not that it’s warming. We are coming out of an ice age, faster in the last 200 years than at anytime modern man has been on earth. It’s simple. If you don’t believe or understand evolution, you probably don’t understand AGW.
Btw, WHERE do you get YOUR numbers. Name and link your source.
Rate isn't the factor, it's amount of total increase (will address soon in another post).
"modern man" a.k.a. homo sapiens has been around at least 200-300,000 years, maybe longer (1-3 million years) depending where to draw the line and what DNA research will eventually reveal. So chew on this and reflect on your increasing displays of ignornce;

iu


iu
 
MIT it will be. Now you admit it is up to MIT, believe me all will be grateful to me for telling you to go away. Let MIT deal with this.

But because of the complexity of the earth’s climatesystem, building any model that can simulate thechanging climate to the satisfaction of policy makers is adifficult task and an ongoing subject of research.Such a model has to answer what happens to temperature,precipitation, humidity, wind speed and direction, clouds,and ice all around the globe over long time scales as aresult of radiativeforcing due to changing amounts ofgreenhouse gases and aerosols.
Speaking of which, at @400 ppm that makes CO2 about 0.0004% of the dry atmosphere.
The most powerful and significant greenhouse gas is water H2O vapor, which adds about another 10% to the dry atmosphere content so would compare at 10.0%.

That's thousands of more times influence and factor on atmosphere warming than CO2.

But, hey; dufus Dogasa knows that ... :rolleyes:
 
According to NOAA's 2023 Annual Climate Report the combined land and ocean temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.11° Fahrenheit (0.06° Celsius) per decade since 1850, or about 2° F in total. The rate of warming since 1982 is more than three times as fast: 0.36° F (0.20° C) per decade.

Climate Change: Global Temperature | NOAA Climate.gov

View attachment 939679
www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-t

NASA
THE cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age. Carbon dioxide from human activities is increasing about 250 times faster than it did from natural sources after the last Ice Age.3
Neither this nor your previous post just before PROVES that CO2 levels are the cause of the temperature blip of increase.
To better gauge and understand, one needs to compare to the longer history of Earth and natural cycles and conditions before human influence MIGHT HAVE played a role, significant or more likely NOT.

iu
 
Last edited:
Every sane and educated person on the planet knows it is a fact. You would get laughed out of any room of these people immediately.
Sane and educated persons will first seek to avoid generalities and get down to specifics.

Are referencing NATURAL Climate Change which has been going on for billions of years or the hypothesis that Climate Change of past 150-200 years is solely human caused = anthropogenic ???
 
Also he is against the gas that is the life blood of Earth. Plants will die if his plan is followed. Life on Earth will perish due to lack of food. He wants Earth to die.
On AVERAGE, most flora/plants need at least 300 ppm of CO2 to barely survive. 400ppm of CO2 bares keeps them alive but they don't flourish. Most greenhouse grow operations use about 1,200 ppm of CO2.
 
I’m fine with you making your own choices not to get shots and dying at a higher rate….it’s happened and I feel fine with it.
Climate change ? Red states shouldn’t get the benefits of federal aid it they are red states….fine with me. You’re in your own Florida in the next storm surge. You think federal agencies lie to you, fine, fix up your own mess. You don’t trust NASA ? Make sure no red states get contract work for the next space exploitation.
So Komrade, you are not a part of the free enterprise, capitalism, profit making, wealth creation process of our Nation's economy.

You are another of those deawood, non-productive, leaching parasites who are the Takers and Fakers bleeding our economy dry.

That makes you a traitor to our nation, since you provide nothing of value or wealth, and also a traitor to humanity since you hate plants/flora and want to kill off 99% of the life on this planet.
 
My side ? Where. Show the link….it could just be your made up lie of what someone has said….show the link…
DUFUS!

The whole foundation of the human-caused/anthropogenic climate change ~global warming: ACC ~ AGW HYPOTHESIS is that it's the increase of CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) from @280 ppm to 400+ppm over past 150+ years of industrialization that is causing average global temperatures to rise (slightly) and if those CO2 emissions aren't drastically reduced the Earth's fever (Al Gore's term) will become a raging fire and we'll burn up the planet.

What many of us are still waiting for is the proof that the rise in CO2 is the cause and also a danger.
(Note that is two separate issues that might be related.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top