Where does it say in the Bible that the human soul is formed at the time of conception?

I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.


"In Jewish law, although the human soul exists before birth, human life begins at birth, that is, at the time when the child is more than halfway emerged from the mother's body."
Judaism 101 Birth and the First Month of Life

In most of the God Squad's interpretation of god's powers and abilities he has already designed a "plan" so one could easily surmise and speculate that every person's soul was assigned even before sex...let alone when a person exited from the womb.

The "plan" is just as much nonsense as the evidence of a soul. Your soul is just your over hyper self awareness and a narcissistic view of your place in evolution.
 
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.


"In Jewish law, although the human soul exists before birth, human life begins at birth, that is, at the time when the child is more than halfway emerged from the mother's body."
Judaism 101 Birth and the First Month of Life

In most of the God Squad's interpretation of god's powers and abilities he has already designed a "plan" so one could easily surmise and speculate that every person's soul was assigned even before sex...let alone when a person exited from the womb.

The "plan" is just as much nonsense as the evidence of a soul. Your soul is just your over hyper self awareness and a narcissistic view of your place in evolution.

Might be we do have 'souls' but religions about god are what's in error. Dark matter and energy both exist though we have yet to quantify them. What we've taken to calling a soul could be something real but as-yet undescribed by science.
 
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.


"In Jewish law, although the human soul exists before birth, human life begins at birth, that is, at the time when the child is more than halfway emerged from the mother's body."
Judaism 101 Birth and the First Month of Life

In most of the God Squad's interpretation of god's powers and abilities he has already designed a "plan" so one could easily surmise and speculate that every person's soul was assigned even before sex...let alone when a person exited from the womb.

The "plan" is just as much nonsense as the evidence of a soul. Your soul is just your over hyper self awareness and a narcissistic view of your place in evolution.

Might be we do have 'souls' but religions about god are what's in error. Dark matter and energy both exist though we have yet to quantify them. What we've taken to calling a soul could be something real but as-yet undescribed by science.

Your narcissism really has it's hooks into your thinking process. Sounds like you are just prolonging the need to justify your personal belief and HOPE.
 
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.
You failed by comparing humans to pancakes... Good Grief man, get a grip how bout it, I mean how silly is your post or OP ? I'd say it's a ten on the silly scale that consist of the numbers one through ten.


Okay, then lets compare it to sperm, or a little guppie-shaped bit of red jelly. (my analogy is appropriate)

In the early months of gestation, the body is building a framework of blood vessels and cartilage and nerves and muscle, but none of it is connected to work as it does in a human being. An early fetus cannot think or feel pleasure or pain. Its muscles jerk periodically as part of its development, however, it isn't a person.
What the fuck is it goldfish?
That is some really screwed logic,ya it something other than human,for how long? and at what point does it become one.
A persons DNA is set at conception,for ever.life begins then.Its just plan common sense,politics,religion are irrelevant.
 
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.


"In Jewish law, although the human soul exists before birth, human life begins at birth, that is, at the time when the child is more than halfway emerged from the mother's body."
Judaism 101 Birth and the First Month of Life

In most of the God Squad's interpretation of god's powers and abilities he has already designed a "plan" so one could easily surmise and speculate that every person's soul was assigned even before sex...let alone when a person exited from the womb.

The "plan" is just as much nonsense as the evidence of a soul. Your soul is just your over hyper self awareness and a narcissistic view of your place in evolution.

Might be we do have 'souls' but religions about god are what's in error. Dark matter and energy both exist though we have yet to quantify them. What we've taken to calling a soul could be something real but as-yet undescribed by science.

Your narcissism really has it's hooks into your thinking process. Sounds like you are just prolonging the need to justify your personal belief and HOPE.

My personal belief is gods don't exist. But something differentiates human beings from other animals.
 
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.
You failed by comparing humans to pancakes... Good Grief man, get a grip how bout it, I mean how silly is your post or OP ? I'd say it's a ten on the silly scale that consist of the numbers one through ten.


Okay, then lets compare it to sperm, or a little guppie-shaped bit of red jelly. (my analogy is appropriate)

In the early months of gestation, the body is building a framework of blood vessels and cartilage and nerves and muscle, but none of it is connected to work as it does in a human being. An early fetus cannot think or feel pleasure or pain. Its muscles jerk periodically as part of its development, however, it isn't a person.
What the fuck is it goldfish?
That is some really screwed logic,ya it something other than human,for how long? and at what point does it become one.
A persons DNA is set at conception,for ever.life begins then.Its just plan common sense,politics,religion are irrelevant.
I've been looking at fake pictures of the fetus on religious extremist sites and was wondering where I might find the above question in scripture?

And when does a pancake become a pancake? An egg and flour have the potential to become a pancake, but it's not really a pancake. When you add all the ingredients of flour, milk, and eggs, it's still not a pancake....it's only batter. It becomes a pancake when the cook decides it's cooked and ready.

To say a fetus is human, is the same as calling the batter a pancake.

Sperm has the potential of creating a human life. A hair has the potential of creating a human life, given potential cloning techniques.

(I'm just pointing out the silliness of this argument)

A potential baby becomes a baby when and if the mother decides it so....when the fetus can live on it's own, right around the neighborhood of 7 months of gestation.


"In Jewish law, although the human soul exists before birth, human life begins at birth, that is, at the time when the child is more than halfway emerged from the mother's body."
Judaism 101 Birth and the First Month of Life

In most of the God Squad's interpretation of god's powers and abilities he has already designed a "plan" so one could easily surmise and speculate that every person's soul was assigned even before sex...let alone when a person exited from the womb.

The "plan" is just as much nonsense as the evidence of a soul. Your soul is just your over hyper self awareness and a narcissistic view of your place in evolution.

Might be we do have 'souls' but religions about god are what's in error. Dark matter and energy both exist though we have yet to quantify them. What we've taken to calling a soul could be something real but as-yet undescribed by science.

Your narcissism really has it's hooks into your thinking process. Sounds like you are just prolonging the need to justify your personal belief and HOPE.

My personal belief is gods don't exist. But something differentiates human beings from other animals.

Sure and something differentiates amoebas from slugs. So what? Show where your "soul" is located. If you can't describe where your soul resides in your body then you have just made it up. Asserting that you have millions of like minded co-believers, god believers or not, means nothing factual.

An over active brain function demands recognition of your individuality. I believe I am, therefore I am. I believe there is more or a purpose to my being therefore there is more or a purpose to my being.

This is a comfortable concept because the other side of the argument is that you are not all that special. In fact you are alone. You came into this world alone and you will leave it alone. Nothing will survive your death. To believe so may give you and those like minded a sense of comfort but that comfort is all that has been proven.
 
"Do you agree... that a fetus isn't human"



no, i do not.

i believe the OP is probably making fun of emotional nutjobs like you.


That little blob of red jelly certainly has the potential to become a person. :p

However, there are no 12 week old fetuses walking around, rubbing its eyes, as the conservative christian extremist sites would have people believe.
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
"Do you agree... that a fetus isn't human"



no, i do not.

i believe the OP is probably making fun of emotional nutjobs like you.



That little blob of red jelly certainly has the potential to become a person. :p

However, there are no 12 week old fetuses walking around, rubbing its eyes, as the conservative christian extremist sites would have people believe.
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
As long as you found that on a tabloid website, it must be true.

lol.....you think Snopes is untrustworthy?......so you don't trust Parents magazine, don't trust Snopes......what sources do YOU rely on the demonstrate a fetus is a clot of blood at 12 weeks?......
 
and yet you want the women to suffer?

.
is making somebody finish what they started "making them suffer"?.....
Since when is rape or incest finishing what someone started? This is the one of a great many issues that you religious zealots fail to address and cannot account for.
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

you kill 60 million without remorse and accuse me of having a Dark Age attitude?......
 
and yet you want the women to suffer?

.
is making somebody finish what they started "making them suffer"?.....
Since when is rape or incest finishing what someone started? This is the one of a great many issues that you religious zealots fail to address and cannot account for.
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

you kill 60 million without remorse and accuse me of having a Dark Age attitude?......
I haven't killed anything. You zealots should spend a little time and form coherent sentences before you make a fool of yourself.

The fact is, the laws of the US relative to abortion provide a reasonable compromise in terms of women's health and reasonable protections to a developing fetus.

Your position is one of an extremist and the majority of Americans understand that there are conflicting interests such that Roe v. Wade provides a reasonable compromise.

How many babies did the gawds you worship kill per the flood tale? It's comical to read your hysterical and phony allusions to caring about a developing fetus when you worship various gawds who slaughtered an entire planet of humanity.
 
Since when is rape or incest finishing what someone started? This is the one of a great many issues that you religious zealots fail to address and cannot account for.
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

You're the stereotype of the phony zealot who whines about " baby killing" while you take an absolutist position about providing no options for a woman who is the victim of rape, incest or a personal / medical decision about childbearing.

Fortunately, you zealots are out of touch both with the majority of Americans and decades of law.

This Nation has always had rules for abortion on rape, incest or the health of the mother even before roe vs. wade.
I don't know where you are getting this idea that the pro lifers are against this when they aren't.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is legal and no one can outlaw abortion until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. Which I don't see happening anytime soon if ever.
That being said, there is nothing that says you can't have rules on when it should be past a certain time to abort or rules that make a woman's decision on abortion to become more educated on what she is aborting especially young teens.

It also seems to me that killing anything is in the Dark Ages.
Simply outlawing abortion except for cases of rape and to protect the life of the mother would eliminate all but a small percentage of abortions.

Can't do that because of the Supreme Court ruling.
This is true. It does, however, point out the disgusting fact that most abortions are used as a form of retroactive birth control.
 
That little blob of red jelly certainly has the potential to become a person. :p

However, there are no 12 week old fetuses walking around, rubbing its eyes, as the conservative christian extremist sites would have people believe.
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
That little blob of red jelly certainly has the potential to become a person. :p

However, there are no 12 week old fetuses walking around, rubbing its eyes, as the conservative christian extremist sites would have people believe.
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
As long as you found that on a tabloid website, it must be true.

lol.....you think Snopes is untrustworthy?......so you don't trust Parents magazine, don't trust Snopes......what sources do YOU rely on the demonstrate a fetus is a clot of blood at 12 weeks?......
What I don't trust are religious loons whose extremist views would eliminate healthcare choices for women. You christian Taliban are wholly out of touch with the majority of Americans who don't share your extremist views.

As usual, you dodge and sidestep addressing your lack of any reasonable choice to be given to women even for circumstances of rape or incest.

It's fortunate that women in this country are protected from the worst elements of you religious zealots so that there are reasonable options available for considered choices regarding healthcare.

Shouldn't you be reading your bibles and praying at the altar of your mass murdering gawds?
 
is making somebody finish what they started "making them suffer"?.....
Since when is rape or incest finishing what someone started? This is the one of a great many issues that you religious zealots fail to address and cannot account for.
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

you kill 60 million without remorse and accuse me of having a Dark Age attitude?......
I haven't killed anything. You zealots should spend a little time and form coherent sentences before you make a fool of yourself.

The fact is, the laws of the US relative to abortion provide a reasonable compromise in terms of women's health and reasonable protections to a developing fetus.

Your position is one of an extremist and the majority of Americans understand that there are conflicting interests such that Roe v. Wade provides a reasonable compromise.

How many babies did the gawds you worship kill per the flood tale? It's comical to read your hysterical and phony allusions to caring about a developing fetus when you worship various gawds who slaughtered an entire planet of humanity.


How dare God wipe out all evil, corruption and violence that was in the world.
It is his Creation and his to do with as he wishes.
This one he did with a flood, the one coming in the not to far off future will be with fire.
2 Timothy 3:2
For people will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred.
 
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

You're the stereotype of the phony zealot who whines about " baby killing" while you take an absolutist position about providing no options for a woman who is the victim of rape, incest or a personal / medical decision about childbearing.

Fortunately, you zealots are out of touch both with the majority of Americans and decades of law.

This Nation has always had rules for abortion on rape, incest or the health of the mother even before roe vs. wade.
I don't know where you are getting this idea that the pro lifers are against this when they aren't.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is legal and no one can outlaw abortion until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. Which I don't see happening anytime soon if ever.
That being said, there is nothing that says you can't have rules on when it should be past a certain time to abort or rules that make a woman's decision on abortion to become more educated on what she is aborting especially young teens.

It also seems to me that killing anything is in the Dark Ages.
Simply outlawing abortion except for cases of rape and to protect the life of the mother would eliminate all but a small percentage of abortions.

Can't do that because of the Supreme Court ruling.
This is true. It does, however, point out the disgusting fact that most abortions are used as a form of retroactive birth control.

Because the women are not being told the full truth.
 
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
how do you explain the ultrasound images of 11 week old fetuses that aren't little blobs of red jelly?......or are you claiming Parents magazine is part of some anti-abortion propaganda campaign?......


You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
As long as you found that on a tabloid website, it must be true.

lol.....you think Snopes is untrustworthy?......so you don't trust Parents magazine, don't trust Snopes......what sources do YOU rely on the demonstrate a fetus is a clot of blood at 12 weeks?......
What I don't trust are religious loons whose extremist views would eliminate healthcare choices for women. You christian Taliban are wholly out of touch with the majority of Americans who don't share your extremist views.

As usual, you dodge and sidestep addressing your lack of any reasonable choice to be given to women even for circumstances of rape or incest.

It's fortunate that women in this country are protected from the worst elements of you religious zealots so that there are reasonable options available for considered choices regarding healthcare.

Shouldn't you be reading your bibles and praying at the altar of your mass murdering gawds?
The position of the democrat party on abortion is an extremist position. Most Americans do not support totally unregulated abortion at any time for any reason. The democrat party does.
 
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

You're the stereotype of the phony zealot who whines about " baby killing" while you take an absolutist position about providing no options for a woman who is the victim of rape, incest or a personal / medical decision about childbearing.

Fortunately, you zealots are out of touch both with the majority of Americans and decades of law.

This Nation has always had rules for abortion on rape, incest or the health of the mother even before roe vs. wade.
I don't know where you are getting this idea that the pro lifers are against this when they aren't.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is legal and no one can outlaw abortion until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. Which I don't see happening anytime soon if ever.
That being said, there is nothing that says you can't have rules on when it should be past a certain time to abort or rules that make a woman's decision on abortion to become more educated on what she is aborting especially young teens.

It also seems to me that killing anything is in the Dark Ages.
Simply outlawing abortion except for cases of rape and to protect the life of the mother would eliminate all but a small percentage of abortions.

Can't do that because of the Supreme Court ruling.
This is true. It does, however, point out the disgusting fact that most abortions are used as a form of retroactive birth control.

Because the women are not being told the full truth.

BS
 
Perhaps the soul of the fetus mimics the soul of the mom. And so is reflected in the eventual outcome from the events that have transpired previous to the pregnancy.
 
Since when is rape or incest finishing what someone started? This is the one of a great many issues that you religious zealots fail to address and cannot account for.
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

you kill 60 million without remorse and accuse me of having a Dark Age attitude?......
I haven't killed anything. You zealots should spend a little time and form coherent sentences before you make a fool of yourself.

The fact is, the laws of the US relative to abortion provide a reasonable compromise in terms of women's health and reasonable protections to a developing fetus.

Your position is one of an extremist and the majority of Americans understand that there are conflicting interests such that Roe v. Wade provides a reasonable compromise.

How many babies did the gawds you worship kill per the flood tale? It's comical to read your hysterical and phony allusions to caring about a developing fetus when you worship various gawds who slaughtered an entire planet of humanity.


How dare God wipe out all evil, corruption and violence that was in the world.
It is his Creation and his to do with as he wishes.
This one he did with a flood, the one coming in the not to far off future will be with fire.
2 Timothy 3:2
For people will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred.
Right. You're perfectly fine with serial mass murder.
 
You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
You've seen pictures, have you?

If you're seeing hands and feet, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

Again, an 11, 12, or 13 week old fetus is...

A. Nothing you could see without a microscope
B. Nothing you could distinguish from a clot of blood
C. Nothing that has a human form

Most of these pictures on the web are photos of later-stage embryos and fetuses, or greatly magnified to look as though they were visible with the naked eye.

here is a picture that Snopes.com publishes to show what a REAL 12 week old fetus looks like.....
real12fetus.jpg

need a microscope?......
snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
As long as you found that on a tabloid website, it must be true.

lol.....you think Snopes is untrustworthy?......so you don't trust Parents magazine, don't trust Snopes......what sources do YOU rely on the demonstrate a fetus is a clot of blood at 12 weeks?......
What I don't trust are religious loons whose extremist views would eliminate healthcare choices for women. You christian Taliban are wholly out of touch with the majority of Americans who don't share your extremist views.

As usual, you dodge and sidestep addressing your lack of any reasonable choice to be given to women even for circumstances of rape or incest.

It's fortunate that women in this country are protected from the worst elements of you religious zealots so that there are reasonable options available for considered choices regarding healthcare.

Shouldn't you be reading your bibles and praying at the altar of your mass murdering gawds?
The position of the democrat party on abortion is an extremist position. Most Americans do not support totally unregulated abortion at any time for any reason. The democrat party does.
Pray that they all die.
 
why is it that baby killers think that 100% of abortions are the result of rape?......the actual number is 1%.....why do you need to kill 100 children for every woman who is raped?......
Why is it that you religious zealots insist on imposing your Dark Ages attitudes on others?

you kill 60 million without remorse and accuse me of having a Dark Age attitude?......
I haven't killed anything. You zealots should spend a little time and form coherent sentences before you make a fool of yourself.

The fact is, the laws of the US relative to abortion provide a reasonable compromise in terms of women's health and reasonable protections to a developing fetus.

Your position is one of an extremist and the majority of Americans understand that there are conflicting interests such that Roe v. Wade provides a reasonable compromise.

How many babies did the gawds you worship kill per the flood tale? It's comical to read your hysterical and phony allusions to caring about a developing fetus when you worship various gawds who slaughtered an entire planet of humanity.


How dare God wipe out all evil, corruption and violence that was in the world.
It is his Creation and his to do with as he wishes.
This one he did with a flood, the one coming in the not to far off future will be with fire.
2 Timothy 3:2
For people will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred.
Right. You're perfectly fine with serial mass murder.

NO the left is fine with that.
Which is what women are doing when they have an abortion just because they don't want to be pregnant and it's inconvenient and uncomfortable.
The attitude of I'm getting rid of the blob because I don't want stretch marks and sore boobs.
It is this type that many of us are against for abortions.
Reasonable abortions most of us do not have a problem with.

If you want an abortion for just convince you should pay for it not all of the taxpayers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top