SC Patriot
Diamond Member
- Aug 31, 2020
- 2,990
- 2,442
Nice try.Unlike you, I can back by claims up. Don't forget, Benghazi was one of the most investigated attacks in our history. This is the fruit those investigations bore...Wrong. COMPLETELY wrong and insulting.Umm, the Obama administration was blaming that video because it was the CIA's assessment that the video spurred the attack. About two weeks later, the CIA changed that assessment to it being a terrorist attack and Obama's administration stopped blaming the video.No one siad Hillary caused those deaths.The attempt to make this in anyway the same as the insider trading that those two republican jackasses did is amusing.Coincidence? I think not.
![]()
Nancy Pelosi Buys Tesla Calls, Stands To Benefit From New Biden EV Plan
The ability of members of U.S. Congress to buy and sell stocks has been controversial over the years. One of its most prominent members made some purchases in December that could benefit from the new Biden administration. What Happened: It was revealed over the weekend that Speaker of the House...finance.yahoo.com
![]()
Joe Biden Signs Executive Order to Make All Federal Vehicles Electric
President Joe Biden signed an executive order Monday to make all federal vehicles run on electricity and phase out those that run on gas.www.breitbart.com
Nancy bought the stock options in December, not on January 25th. Only an idiot would think that buying stock in green energy companies would be a bad investment with a Democrat in the White House, so it's not like it was "insider news" at the time.
Joe Biden signed the Executive Order on January 25th, not January 26th - It's in your Breitbart Link, Fuck Boi. Your Breitbart article was published on the 26th, but the EO was signed on the 25th.
If this weak ass shit is the best you've got, it's gonna be a long, long 4 years for you, FuckBoi.
It's what Republicans do with a Democrat in the White House. Benghazi had 7 investigations, all concluding that the Obama Administration did nothing wrong and there was no cover up. The loss of American life, could not have been prevented that night, once events were in motion. And yet, Republicans still believe that Hillary caused those deaths, and there was a coverup.
What bothered conservatives was the fact that Obama administration blamed an Americans right to free speech for the deaths.
Sure, the film was irresponsible....but not illegal.
But the administration chose to tell the world that our most sacred right, right to free speech is what caused those deaths.
When, In fact, it didnt.
That was un-American.
The CIA made no assessment at the beginning. They don't do that. It would be negligence.
The CIA puts together an AAR that usually takes days to complete...and then they submit a report. It includes video evaluation, witness testimony, cause of death study not to mention recon that sometimes takes days to collect, evaluate and assess.
So what you said is not only factually incorrect....but if fed to you by news media...it is propaganda and very dangerous.
The State department chose to blame the deaths on the video before having any report from any agency. That is a fact.
So, without the DoD, the CIA or the FBI offering their evaluation, the administration believed it best to blame an American exercising his first amendment right. Yes, he did so irresponsibly.....but he did not break the law.
Know your facts before you regurgitate propoganda.
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.![]()
House Panel Finds 'No Intelligence Failure' Before Benghazi Attack
The final report by the House Intelligence Committee concludes the CIA "ensured sufficient security for CIA facilities in Benghazi and ... bravely assisted the State Department" on Sept. 11, 2012.www.npr.org
Now stop making shit up.
Showing me "investigations that took place weeks and months after the attack" does not explain why the administration blamed the attack on the first day on some American expressing his first amendment right.
Do you think it was right for the State Department blame an American exercising his first amendment right without knowing for sure?
Is that where you come from? Blame Americans first, then take it back later if wrong?