15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

[ding]

And I am telling you its meaning is not limited to programming.

No need to tell me, sparky. I knew more about it than you to begin with.

Your post contents belie your knowledge.
AKA...you post like a simpleton.

Just making sure not to lose people like you and ding, clearly among the lowest common denominators here.

^dunning effect

 

[Grumblenuts]

And I am telling you its meaning is not limited to programming.

No need to tell me, sparky. I knew more about it than you to begin with.

Your post contents belie your knowledge.
AKA...you post like a simpleton.

Just making sure not to lose people like you and ding, clearly among the lowest common denominators here.

^dunning effect

Indeed. You do seem unreachable.

 

[ding]

And I am telling you its meaning is not limited to programming.

No need to tell me, sparky. I knew more about it than you to begin with.

Your post contents belie your knowledge.
AKA...you post like a simpleton.

Just making sure not to lose people like you and ding, clearly among the lowest common denominators here.

^dunning effect

Indeed. You do seem unreachable.

That's still the dunning effect

 

[Grumblenuts]

Yes, dingbat. It is. Youse win da Darwin Award.. hands down.

 

[ding]

And I am telling you its meaning is not limited to programming.

No need to tell me, sparky. I knew more about it than you to begin with.

Your post contents belie your knowledge.
AKA...you post like a simpleton.

Just making sure not to lose people like you and ding, clearly among the lowest common denominators here.

^dunning effect

Indeed. You do seem unreachable.

So you won't be providing your hypothesis on prayer?

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[ding]

Yes, dingbat. It is. Youse win da Darwin Award.. hands down.

I'm not the one who is denying natural selection. That's you.

 

[Indeependent]

And I am telling you its meaning is not limited to programming.

No need to tell me, sparky. I knew more about it than you to begin with.

Your post contents belie your knowledge.
AKA...you post like a simpleton.

Just making sure not to lose people like you and ding, clearly among the lowest common denominators here.

^dunning effect

More like dumbing effect

 

[abu afak]

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.
Lol

Hey Quesadilla, you MORON.
How did god get 'created out of nothing.'?

Or that logical to you?
`

 

[abu afak]

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

The slime to larger slime scheme is better than the 'god from nothing scheme' OrthoDucks ahole.
.'`

 

[ding]

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

The slime to larger slime scheme is better than the 'god from nothing scheme' OrthoDucks ahole.
.'`

You can funny this too, Mr. Mensa.

The data overwhelmingly shows that man is a spiritual being. It is for good reason that David Foster Wallace said that we all worship something and the only choice in the matter is what we choose to worship. We are literally hardwired for it. Throughout history every society has overwhelmingly held the belief that man is more than just matter and that there is a higher power than man. When we look at the data today we see that more and more people are rejecting organized religion but have not abandoned their belief that they are more than just matter or that there is a force which connects or binds us all. From the atheist's vantage point these beliefs exist because of evolutionary forces. But the reality is that even that argument confirms that spirituality offers a functional advantage over materialism. According to natural selection there are two main components; functional advantage and transfer of functional advantage to the next generation. So even natural selection confirms that spirituality is a behavior which leads to success. Otherwise, according to natural selection, it would have been abandoned long ago. As mankind has gained more and more knowledge of his natural surroundings his desire for spirituality has not diminished. In fact, the more materialistic we became the less satisfied we became.

 

[ding]

So explore the functional advantage that spirituality has over materialism.

William James said, "When all is said and done, we are in the end absolutely dependent on the universe; and into sacrifices and surrenders of some sort, deliberately looked at and accepted, we are drawn and pressed as into our only permanent positions of repose. Now in those states of mind which fall short of religion, the surrender is submitted to as an imposition of necessity, and the sacrifice is undergone at the very best without complaint. In the religious life, on the contrary, surrender and sacrifice are positively espoused: even unnecessary givings-up are added in order that the happiness may increase. Religion thus makes easy and felicitous what in any case is necessary; and if it be the only agency that can accomplish this result, its vital importance as a human faculty stands vindicated beyond dispute. It becomes an essential organ of our life, performing a function which no other portion of our nature can so successfully fulfill."

So there you have it. Functional advantage.

 

[ding]

Next time send me a bigger one.

Mystery, Alaska (1999) clip with quote Next time send me a bigger one. Yarn is the best search for video clips by quote. Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. Easily move forward or backward to get to the perfect clip.

getyarn.io

 

[abu afak]

Spiritual

There's evidence you're spiritual/delusional, but NO evidence there's an object of your beliefs, nor all the contrary ones.
You are a logical disaster/cumstain.
There is overwhelming evidence for Evolution though.


`

 

[ding]

You can funny this too, Mr. Mensa.

The data overwhelmingly shows that man is a spiritual being. It is for good reason that David Foster Wallace said that we all worship something and the only choice in the matter is what we choose to worship. We are literally hardwired for it. Throughout history every society has overwhelmingly held the belief that man is more than just matter and that there is a higher power than man. When we look at the data today we see that more and more people are rejecting organized religion but have not abandoned their belief that they are more than just matter or that there is a force which connects or binds us all. From the atheist's vantage point these beliefs exist because of evolutionary forces. But the reality is that even that argument confirms that spirituality offers a functional advantage over materialism. According to natural selection there are two main components; functional advantage and transfer of functional advantage to the next generation. So even natural selection confirms that spirituality is a behavior which leads to success. Otherwise, according to natural selection, it would have been abandoned long ago. As mankind has gained more and more knowledge of his natural surroundings his desire for spirituality has not diminished. In fact, the more materialistic we became the less satisfied we became.

There's evidence you're spiritual/delusional, but NO evidence there's an object of your beliefs, nor all the contrary ones.
You are a logical disaster/cumstain.
There is overwhelming evidence for Evolution though.


`

I like how you couldn't bring yourself to reply to the whole post. Don't worry, I added the rest.

Evolution and a Creator are not mutually exclusive. It should be obvious that if the material world were not created by spirit that everything that has unfolded in the evolution of space and time would have no intentional purpose. That it is just matter and energy doing what matter and energy do. Conversely, if the material world were created by spirit it should be obvious that the creation of the material world was intentional. After all in my perception of God, God is no thing and the closest thing I can relate to is a mind with no body. Using our own experiences as creators as a proxy, we know that when we create things we create them for a reason and that reason is to serve some purpose. So it would be no great leap of logic to believe that something like a mind with no body would do the same. We also know from our experiences that intelligence tends to create intelligence. We are obsessed with making smart things. So what better thing for a mind with no body to do than create a universe where beings with bodies can create smart things too.

We have good reason to believe that we find ourselves in a universe permeated with life, in which life arises inevitably, given enough time, wherever the conditions exist that make it possible. Yet were any one of a number of the physical properties of our universe otherwise - some of them basic, others seemingly trivial, almost accidental - that life, which seems now to be so prevalent, would become impossible, here or anywhere. It takes no great imagination to conceive of other possible universes, each stable and workable in itself, yet lifeless. How is it that, with so many other apparent options, we are in a universe that possesses just that peculiar nexus of properties that breeds beings that know and create.

The biological laws are such that life is programmed to survive and multiply which is a requisite for intelligence to arise. If the purpose of the universe was to create intelligence then a preference in nature for it had to exist. The Laws of Nature are such that the potential for intelligence to existed the moment space and time were created. One can argue that given the laws of nature and the size of the universe that intelligence arising was inevitable. One can also argue that creating intelligence from nothing defies the Second Law of Entropy. That creating intelligence from nothing increases order within the universe. It actually doesn't because usable energy was lost along the way as a cost of creating order from disorder. But it is nature overriding it's tendency for ever increasing disorder that interests me and raises my suspicions to look deeper and to take seriously the proposition that a mind without a body created the material world so that minds with bodies could create too.

If we examine the physical laws we discover that we live in a logical universe governed by rules, laws and information. Rules laws and information are a signs of intelligence. Intentionality and purpose are signs of intelligence. The definition of reason is a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event. The definition of purpose is the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists. The consequence of a logical universe is that every cause has an effect. Which means that everything happens for a reason and serves a purpose. The very nature of our physical laws point to reason and purpose.

All we have done so far is to make a logical argument for spirit creating the material world. Certainly not an argument built of fairy tales that's for sure. So going back to the two possibilities; spirit creating the material world versus everything proceeding from the material, the key distinction is no thing versus thing. So if we assume that everything I have described was just an accidental coincidence of the properties of matter, the logical conclusion is that matter and energy are just doing what matter and energy do which makes sense. The problem is that for matter and energy to do what matter and energy do, there has to be rules in place for matter and energy to obey. The formation of space and time followed rules. Specifically the law of conservation and quantum mechanics. These laws existed before space and time and defined the potential of everything which was possible. These laws are no thing. So we literally have an example of no thing existing before the material world. The creation of space and time from nothing is literally correct. Space and time were created from no thing. Spirit is no thing. No thing created space and time.

 

[ding]

Spiritual

There's evidence you're spiritual/delusional, but NO evidence there's an object of your beliefs, nor all the contrary ones.
You are a logical disaster/cumstain.
There is overwhelming evidence for Evolution though.


`

Is everyone who disagrees with you delusional?

Do you call people at your work cumstains when they disagree with you?

 

[abu afak]

So Ding-a-Ling has No answer to the simple fact.

There's evidence you're spiritual/delusional, but NO evidence there's an object of your beliefs, nor all the contrary ones.
You are a logical disaster/cumstain.
There is overwhelming evidence for Evolution though.

IOW, you cannot prove, or even show EVIDENCE of a god .
While I can show overwhelming EVIDENCE for evolution

Your posts are Delusional distraction/Deflections from that simple fact.

`

 

[Grumblenuts]

It should be obvious that if the material world were not created by spirit that everything that has unfolded in the evolution of space and time would have no intentional purpose. That it is just matter and energy doing what matter and energy do. Conversely, if the material world were created by spirit

It would also have no purpose. "Spirit" is simply the way you sneak in your appeal to religious belief. God did it! Nope. And as always, you neglect the Aether (math) which necessarily precedes any space, time, matter, or energy. All or which, as I've indicated before, can easily be referred to simply as "Nature" or "Natural" meaning what would be the case without human interference, including any supposed interference from man's conveniently concocted spirits or gods.

The result of randomly tossing an evenly weighted coin infinite times clearly depends upon no plan, gods, or laws. Probability (Nature) dictates that it will be exactly 50/50 in the limit.. whether flipped by man or monkey. Addition and multiplication exhibit commutative and associative properties, not plans, gods, or laws. Because math is a real part of Nature. A part that we've only partially explored and discovered, much the same as crows have done. We don't create, invent, or plan math. It would all be there waiting, just the same, with or without us.

 

[ding]

It should be obvious that if the material world were not created by spirit that everything that has unfolded in the evolution of space and time would have no intentional purpose. That it is just matter and energy doing what matter and energy do. Conversely, if the material world were created by spirit

It would also have no purpose. "Spirit" is simply the way you sneak in your appeal to religious belief. God did it! Nope. And as always, you neglect the Aether (math) which necessarily precedes any space, time, matter, or energy. All or which, as I've indicated before, can easily be referred to simply as "Nature" or "Natural" meaning what would be the case without human interference, including any supposed interference from man's conveniently concocted spirits or gods.

The result of randomly tossing an evenly weighted coin infinite times clearly depends upon no plan, gods, or laws. Probability (Nature) dictates that it will be exactly 50/50 in the limit.. whether flipped by man or monkey. Addition and multiplication exhibit commutative and associative properties, not plans, gods, or laws. Because math is a real part of Nature. A part that we've only partially explored and discovered, much the same as crows have done. We don't create, invent, or plan math. It would all be there waiting, just the same, with or without us.

Randomly tossing a coin requires a prime mover. So does nature. In fact, your explanation implies it was guided. What is math if not mind stuff?

So if we assume that everything I have described was just an accidental coincidence of the properties of matter, the logical conclusion is that matter and energy are just doing what matter and energy do which makes sense. The problem is that for matter and energy to do what matter and energy do, there has to be rules in place for matter and energy to obey. The formation of space and time followed rules. Specifically the law of conservation and quantum mechanics. These laws existed before space and time and defined the potential of everything which was possible. These laws are no thing. So we literally have an example of no thing existing before the material world. The creation of space and time from nothing is literally correct. Space and time were created from no thing. Spirit is no thing. No thing created space and time.

 

[ding]

It should be obvious that if the material world were not created by spirit that everything that has unfolded in the evolution of space and time would have no intentional purpose. That it is just matter and energy doing what matter and energy do. Conversely, if the material world were created by spirit

It would also have no purpose. "Spirit" is simply the way you sneak in your appeal to religious belief. God did it! Nope. And as always, you neglect the Aether (math) which necessarily precedes any space, time, matter, or energy. All or which, as I've indicated before, can easily be referred to simply as "Nature" or "Natural" meaning what would be the case without human interference, including any supposed interference from man's conveniently concocted spirits or gods.

The result of randomly tossing an evenly weighted coin infinite times clearly depends upon no plan, gods, or laws. Probability (Nature) dictates that it will be exactly 50/50 in the limit.. whether flipped by man or monkey. Addition and multiplication exhibit commutative and associative properties, not plans, gods, or laws. Because math is a real part of Nature. A part that we've only partially explored and discovered, much the same as crows have done. We don't create, invent, or plan math. It would all be there waiting, just the same, with or without us.

It's not an accident that the universe is an intelligence creating machine.

If we examine the physical laws we discover that we live in a logical universe governed by rules, laws and information. Rules laws and information are a signs of intelligence. Intentionality and purpose are signs of intelligence. The definition of reason is a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event. The definition of purpose is the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists. The consequence of a logical universe is that every cause has an effect. Which means that everything happens for a reason and serves a purpose. The very nature of our physical laws point to reason and purpose.

Were any one of a number of the physical properties of our universe otherwise - some of them basic, others seemingly trivial, almost accidental - that life, which seems now to be so prevalent, would become impossible, here or anywhere. It takes no great imagination to conceive of other possible universes, each stable and workable in itself, yet lifeless. How is it that, with so many other apparent options, we are in a universe that possesses just that peculiar nexus of properties that breeds beings that know and create.

Mind, rather than emerging as a late outgrowth in the evolution of life, has existed always as the matrix, the source and condition of physical reality - that the stuff of which physical reality is composed is mind-stuff. It is Mind that has composed a physical universe that breeds life, and so eventually evolves creatures that know and create.

 

[ding]

It should be obvious that if the material world were not created by spirit that everything that has unfolded in the evolution of space and time would have no intentional purpose. That it is just matter and energy doing what matter and energy do. Conversely, if the material world were created by spirit

It would also have no purpose. "Spirit" is simply the way you sneak in your appeal to religious belief. God did it! Nope. And as always, you neglect the Aether (math) which necessarily precedes any space, time, matter, or energy. All or which, as I've indicated before, can easily be referred to simply as "Nature" or "Natural" meaning what would be the case without human interference, including any supposed interference from man's conveniently concocted spirits or gods.

The result of randomly tossing an evenly weighted coin infinite times clearly depends upon no plan, gods, or laws. Probability (Nature) dictates that it will be exactly 50/50 in the limit.. whether flipped by man or monkey. Addition and multiplication exhibit commutative and associative properties, not plans, gods, or laws. Because math is a real part of Nature. A part that we've only partially explored and discovered, much the same as crows have done. We don't create, invent, or plan math. It would all be there waiting, just the same, with or without us.

"...It is primarily physicists who in recent times have expressed most clearly and forthrightly this pervasive relationship between mind and matter, and indeed at times the primacy of mind. Arthur Eddington in 1928 wrote, “the stuff of the world is mind‑stuff ... The mind‑stuff is not spread in space and time.... Recognizing that the physical world is entirely abstract and without ‘actuality’ apart from its linkage to consciousness, we restore consciousness to the fundamental position . . .”

Von Weizsacker in 1971 states as “a new and, I feel, intelligible interpretation of quantum theory” what he calls his “Identity Hypothesis: Consciousness and matter are different aspects of the same reality.”

I like most of all Wolfgang Pauli’s formulation, from 1952: “To us . . . the only acceptable point of view appears to be the one that recognizes both sides of reality -- the quantitative and the qualitative, the physical and the psychical -- as compatible with each other, and can embrace them simultaneously . . . It would be most satisfactory of all if physis and psyche (i.e., matter and mind) could be seen as complementary aspects of the same reality.”

What this kind of thought means essentially is that one has no more basis for considering the existence of matter without its complementary aspect of mind, than for asking that elementary particles not also be waves.

As for this seeming a strange viewpoint for a scientist -- at least until one gets used to it -- as in so many other instances, what is wanted is not so much an acceptable concept as an acceptable rhetoric. If I say, with Eddington, “the stuff of the world is mind‑stuff,” that has a metaphysical ring. But if I say that ultimate reality is expressed in the solutions of the equations of quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and quantum field theory -- that sounds like good, modern physics. Yet what are those equations, indeed what is mathematics, but mind‑stuff? -- virtually the ultimate in mind‑stuff and for that reason deeply mysterious..." George Wald