18 Democrat State Attorneys General Sue to Stop Trump’s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

Keep in mind our Supreme Court is not granted legislative power to make anchor babies citizens

I don’t see how our Supreme Court would be acting within their limited power if they declare the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil are citizens upon birth. The 14th Amendment gives Congress, and only Congress, the power to adopt “appropriate legislation” to enforce the Amendment. For the Supreme Court to step in and declare such citizenship would be a violation of our separation of power doctrine and be exercising Congress’s exclusive law-making power under the 14th Amendment.

Keep in mind that in 1924 Congress exercised its exclusive power under the “Indian Citizenship Act of 1924”, extending citizenship as outlined in the Act. Since then, I can find no “appropriate legislation” under which Congress has extended citizenship to the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil.
Currently, there is no S.C. Case, or Act of Congress by which citizenship is recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil. Unwritten federal policy, and only unwritten federal policy, now recognizes them as such.

It is important to note that under Article 2 of our Constitution, our President gets to exercise administrative policy changes, such as was exercised by Biden, when he was President, with his disastrous and destructive open border policy.

This policy making authority of our President is a hallmark of our Republican Form of Government and our Constitution, which also provides for elections in order to accommodate change of existing public policy as determined by the people through elections and their vote.

As far as I can tell, President Trump is free, as he has done by Executive Order, to exercise his administrative policy-making power, so long as it does not violate any provisions of our Constitution, and he may change existing federal policy which has recognized the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil as citizens of the United States upon birth.

Our S.C. should not get involved in this policy making change, except to educate the public how our system works, and that elections have consequences, one of those consequences is the setting new federal public policy.​

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story
 


In LIZA, individually and as next friend to her future child vs. DONALD J. TRUMP, the complaint suspiciously fails to establish standing with the court . . . a requirement which is absolutely essential for the case to proceed.
Let us recall Texas v. Mayorkas (TX Public Charge) - District Court LINK

CONCLUSION

The burden to establish standing is always on the plaintiff, and Texas has failed to meet its burden here. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 40), is DENIED, and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 47), is GRANTED in part insofar as it is premised on Texas’s lack of standing and DENIED in part as moot as to all other parts addressing the merits.
It is SO ORDERED.
 
Last edited:
‘Pregnant women across the country have been joining forces to file lawsuits against the federal government over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States, according to court records.

Attorneys in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have filed lawsuits on behalf of expecting parents in response to Trump’s order last week, which has been blasted as “blatantly unconstitutional” by federal judges as it runs into legal trouble.

Attorneys general of 18 states and two major cities, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have also teamed up to challenge the order — filing a joint lawsuit last Tuesday, Jan. 21, in federal district court.

“Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage,” the complaint says. “The principle of birthright citizenship has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 150 years. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment unambiguously and expressly confers citizenship on ‘[a]ll persons born’ in and ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. More than 125 years ago, the Supreme Court confirmed that this entitles a child born in the United States to noncitizen parents to automatic citizenship.”’


An EO motivated solely by racism, bigotry, and hate by someone unfit to hold any public office.
 
‘Pregnant women across the country have been joining forces to file lawsuits against the federal government over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States, according to court records.

Attorneys in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have filed lawsuits on behalf of expecting parents in response to Trump’s order last week, which has been blasted as “blatantly unconstitutional” by federal judges as it runs into legal trouble.

Attorneys general of 18 states and two major cities, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have also teamed up to challenge the order — filing a joint lawsuit last Tuesday, Jan. 21, in federal district court.

“Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage,” the complaint says. “The principle of birthright citizenship has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 150 years. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment unambiguously and expressly confers citizenship on ‘[a]ll persons born’ in and ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. More than 125 years ago, the Supreme Court confirmed that this entitles a child born in the United States to noncitizen parents to automatic citizenship.”’


An EO motivated solely by racism, bigotry, and hate by someone unfit to hold any public office.
So you are saying that fetuses are people ?
 
‘Pregnant women across the country have been joining forces to file lawsuits against the federal government over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States, according to court records.

Attorneys in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have filed lawsuits on behalf of expecting parents in response to Trump’s order last week, which has been blasted as “blatantly unconstitutional” by federal judges as it runs into legal trouble.

Attorneys general of 18 states and two major cities, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have also teamed up to challenge the order — filing a joint lawsuit last Tuesday, Jan. 21, in federal district court.

“Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage,” the complaint says. “The principle of birthright citizenship has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 150 years. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment unambiguously and expressly confers citizenship on ‘[a]ll persons born’ in and ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. More than 125 years ago, the Supreme Court confirmed that this entitles a child born in the United States to noncitizen parents to automatic citizenship.”’


An EO motivated solely by racism, bigotry, and hate by someone unfit to hold any public office.

Dupe thread, already been posted. Maybe you should use the search function instead of wasting valuable board resources.

Washington State: Three local pregnant women sue Trump administration over birthright citizenship order

And once again, the 14th Amendment was ratified after the Civil War. Its intent was to give citizenship to the freed slaves, and had nothing to do with hordes of illegals crossing the border, squatting down, and dropping their crotch-fruit.
 
Dupe thread, already been posted. Maybe you should use the search function instead of wasting valuable board resources.

Washington State: Three local pregnant women sue Trump administration over birthright citizenship order

And once again, the 14th Amendment was ratified after the Civil War. Its intent was to give citizenship to the freed slaves, and had nothing to do with hordes of illegals crossing the border, squatting down, and dropping their crotch-fruit.
But the mere presence of the lawsuits (filed before the kids are even born) definitely proves that the illegals are trying to use a "back door" to come here and stay, instead of immigrating the legal way.

The fact they are proving their actions were premeditated (and they aren't showing up for their hearings) should earn them a ticket home.
 
Last edited:
‘Pregnant women across the country have been joining forces to file lawsuits against the federal government over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States, according to court records.

Attorneys in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have filed lawsuits on behalf of expecting parents in response to Trump’s order last week, which has been blasted as “blatantly unconstitutional” by federal judges as it runs into legal trouble.

Attorneys general of 18 states and two major cities, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have also teamed up to challenge the order — filing a joint lawsuit last Tuesday, Jan. 21, in federal district court.

“Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage,” the complaint says. “The principle of birthright citizenship has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 150 years. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment unambiguously and expressly confers citizenship on ‘[a]ll persons born’ in and ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. More than 125 years ago, the Supreme Court confirmed that this entitles a child born in the United States to noncitizen parents to automatic citizenship.”’


An EO motivated solely by racism, bigotry, and hate by someone unfit to hold any public office.
Trump will find the names of rhe Plantiffs and deport them. He won’t do tit based on their race, he will deport them all

He’s an equal opportunity deporter of illegals
 
‘Pregnant women across the country have been joining forces to file lawsuits against the federal government over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States, according to court records.

Attorneys in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have filed lawsuits on behalf of expecting parents in response to Trump’s order last week, which has been blasted as “blatantly unconstitutional” by federal judges as it runs into legal trouble.

Attorneys general of 18 states and two major cities, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have also teamed up to challenge the order — filing a joint lawsuit last Tuesday, Jan. 21, in federal district court.

“Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage,” the complaint says. “The principle of birthright citizenship has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 150 years. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment unambiguously and expressly confers citizenship on ‘[a]ll persons born’ in and ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. More than 125 years ago, the Supreme Court confirmed that this entitles a child born in the United States to noncitizen parents to automatic citizenship.”’


An EO motivated solely by racism, bigotry, and hate by someone unfit to hold any public office.
jone you are one of the biggest bigots on this board....
 

Forum List

Back
Top