- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,625
- 53,499
- 3,605
And yet the CDC isn't allowed to STUDY the statistics of who gets shot, who dies, where they're shot, morbidity/mortality rates, etc. They did stats for cigarettes, alcohol, dog bites, even POOLS, swingsets and CARS.But I digress. On to why gun control could never workâŚ
First, prohibiting popular things has never been a successful endeavor in America. Just look at our countryâs history with alcohol and cannabis. So, how can these same politicians, who are theoretically in favor of ending the war on drugs because, among other reasons, prohibition is a failed social policy, be simultaneously in favor of trying the exact same failed experiment by banning something else for the exact same stated reason, which is supposedly to protect the public and especially the children? You know that quote commonly attributed to Einstein about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result? He also said not to look for logical consistency among hypocrites, or rather he probably would have said that if he had ever laid eyes on the DNCâs bunch of elected phony intellectuals.
Debunking Gun Control Using Moon Rocks, Swimming Pools and 9/11
What are YOU and and the NRA afraid of?
The CDC is governmentally controlled dork they wouldn't tell you the truth anyway. They are to busy helping big pharma get rich of their idiots who don't pay attention.
The federal government already did research on this topic, and it found out that;
CDC Gun Research Backfires on Obama
"1. Armed citizens are less likely to be injured by an attacker:
âStudies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was âusedâ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.â
2. Defensive uses of guns are common:
âAlmost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per yearâŚin the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.â
3. Mass shootings and accidental firearm deaths account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths, and both are declining:
âThe number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths. Since 1983 there have been 78 events in which 4 or more individuals were killed by a single perpetrator in 1 day in the United States, resulting in 547 victims and 476 injured persons.â The report also notes, âUnintentional firearm-related deaths have steadily declined during the past century. The number of unintentional deaths due to firearm-related incidents accounted for less than 1 percent of all unintentional fatalities in 2010.â
4. âInterventionsâ (i.e, gun control) such as background checks, so-called assault rifle bans and gun-free zones produce âmixedâ results:
âWhether gun restrictions reduce firearm-related violence is an unresolved issue.â The report could not conclude whether âpassage of right-to-carry laws decrease or increase violence crime.â
5. Gun buyback/turn-in programs are âineffectiveâ in reducing crime:
âThere is empirical evidence that gun turn in programs are ineffective, as noted in the 2005 NRC study Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review. For example, in 2009, an estimated 310 million guns were available to civilians in the United States (Krouse, 2012), but gun buy-back programs typically recover less than 1,000 guns (NRC, 2005). On the local level, buy-backs may increase awareness of firearm violence. However, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for example, guns recovered in the buy-back were not the same guns as those most often used in homicides and suicides (Kuhn et al., 2002).â
6. Stolen guns and retail/gun show purchases account for very little crime:
âMore recent prisoner surveys suggest that stolen guns account for only a small percentage of guns used by convicted criminals. ⌠According to a 1997 survey of inmates, approximately 70 percent of the guns used or possess by criminals at the time of their arrest came from family or friends, drug dealers, street purchases, or the underground market.â
7. The vast majority of gun-related deaths are not homicides, but suicides:
âBetween the years 2000-2010 firearm-related suicides significantly outnumbered homicides for all age groups, annually accounting for 61 percent of the more than 335,600 people who died from firearms related violence in the United States.â
Why No One Has Heard This
Given the CDCâs prior track record on guns, you may be surprised by the extent with which the new research refutes some of the anti-gun movementâs deepest convictions.
What are opponents of the Second Amendment doing about the new data? Perhaps predictably, theyâre ignoring it. President Obama, Michael Bloomberg and the Brady Campaign remain silent. Most suspicious of all, the various media outlets that so eagerly anticipated the CDC research are looking the other way as well. One must wonder how media coverage of the CDC report may have differed, had the research more closely fit an anti-gun narrative.
Even worse, the few mainstream journalists who did report the CDCâs findings chose to cherry-pick from the data. Most, like NBC News, reported exclusively on the finding that gun suicides are up. Largely lost in that discussion is the fact that the overall rate of suicideâregardless of whether a gun is involved or notâis also up."
FIREARM-RELATED
VIOLENCE
https://www.nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/1#iii