9/11 Mastermind Given Plea Deal After FBI Confirms He Was Not Present At Capitol January 6th

[Votto]

9/11 Mastermind Given Plea Deal After FBI Confirms He Was Not Present At Capitol January 6th
U.S.·Aug 1, 2024 · BabylonBee.com
Click here to view this article with reduced ads.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a notable development in a case that has spanned over two decades, the mastermind behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks was given a plea deal after the FBI confirmed that he was not present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, held in U.S. custody since 2003, agreed to a deal that will allow him to avoid the death penalty after investigators were able to rule out his involvement in the far more terrible and tragic events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

"He did some things to some people, but he wasn't part of the darkest day in American history," said FBI Director Christopher Wray. "We conducted a thorough investigation into any potential connection he may have had to the attempted insurrection on January 6, 2021, but were only able to find evidence that he planned the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed over 3,000 Americans, which isn't nearly as serious."

Though family members of those who lost their lives in the attacks on September 11, 2001 questioned the Biden administration for making the deal, insiders reiterated Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's lack of involvement in the Jan 6 Capitol riots. "It's important to keep things in perspective," one source said. "While there are people who have grown up never knowing their fathers or mothers because they were killed on 9/11, that pales in comparison to that horrible day when some people calmly walked through the halls of the U.S. Capitol."

At publishing time, the Justice Department was also reportedly preparing to posthumously pardon Osama bin Laden after finding out he was not a supporter of Donald Trump.

 

[JGalt]

Rosie O'Mohammed

 

[DGS49]

Democrat regimes and an incompetent DoJ have worked the U.S. into a legal dilemma with respect to these evil fukkers.

The point is that a CRIMINAL prosecution is fundamentally different from the legitimate treatment of POW's. The inmates at Gitmo were apprehended in ways that would never hold up under U.S. 4th Amendment principles, and the evidence on which they were identified and apprehended will not hold up under U.S. evidentiary rules. You are looking at searches, wiretaps, and investigations without a warrant and purely speculative "probable cause."

Accordingly, if it ever came to a trial under generic Constitutional rules, the defense would obliterate the cases of the prosecution. "We" would quickly look like a bunch of idiots, and all cases would result in acquittals.

This is why it has taken forever to dispose of these cases. The prosecution knows that it can never obtain a legitimate guilty verdict.

The case for simply releasing these bastards is compelling. They are considered martyrs and heroes in the radical Islamic community. Further, they are constantly attacking the guards at Gitmo with impunity. You could look it up.