Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what started the event???Was the black guy not retreating in the footage we do have?You're assuming he's standing his ground. How do you know that without knowing how it started?
Seems to me that white guy was about to ground and pound the black guy had he not been stopped.Don't know enough. Was his life actually threatened? Doesnt look that way to me.
Stand your ground is a high threshold to reach. Looks more like a thug itching to pay back some white MF
How do you guys think this will play out...?
or he was responding to an attack against him and his,,,Seems to me that white guy was about to ground and pound the black guy had he not been stopped.Don't know enough. Was his life actually threatened? Doesnt look that way to me.
Stand your ground is a high threshold to reach. Looks more like a thug itching to pay back some white MF
yes it does,,,you cant start a fight and then shoot them and claim stand your ground,,,Does the law state that it matters who started, or who's retreating or what?what started the event???
How do you explain his retreating then?yes it does,,,you cant start a fight and then shoot them and claim stand your ground,,,
we cant explain it because theres not enough of what started it in the video,,,How do you explain his retreating then?yes it does,,,you cant start a fight and then shoot them and claim stand your ground,,,
Remember, the gun wasn't introduced, until the white attacker confronted the retreating black guy.
I find it dismaying that so many respondents on this thread presume to judge the man based on such scant evidence. We have courts and judges and juries to handle that task. Sometimes the intelligent response is to wait and see.or he was responding to an attack against him and his,,,Seems to me that white guy was about to ground and pound the black guy had he not been stopped.Don't know enough. Was his life actually threatened? Doesnt look that way to me.
Stand your ground is a high threshold to reach. Looks more like a thug itching to pay back some white MF
I'm not sure there's anything else that applies here.we cant explain it because theres not enough of what started it in the video,,,
get that and then we can see if it applies,,,
that would depend on how he started it,,I'm not sure there's anything else that applies here.we cant explain it because theres not enough of what started it in the video,,,
get that and then we can see if it applies,,,
Let's say the black guy started it, clearly he had a change of mind and decided to retreat.
At the point of the white guy deciding to attack the black guy, he's now initiating a NEW attack.
No?
OBVIOUSLYDoes the law state that it matters who started, or who's retreating or what?what started the event???
Then it is not stand your ground.I'm not sure there's anything else that applies here.we cant explain it because theres not enough of what started it in the video,,,
get that and then we can see if it applies,,,
Let's say the black guy started it, clearly he had a change of mind and decided to retreat.
At the point of the white guy deciding to attack the black guy now in retreat, he's now initiating a NEW attack.
No?
Race-soldier Kyle Rittenhouse didn't stick around to talk to cops.that would depend on how he started it,,
lets say he just tried a knock out game on him and the other guy wanted to detain him for arrest???
either way why didnt he stay and talk to the cops??? that makes it very suspicious,,,
How do you guys think this will play out...?
In that case race-soldier George Zimmerman DEFINITELY got away w/murder.Then it is not stand your ground.
In order for that law to apply - you cannot be the original aggressor, or taunt/dare.