How come the parasite class never made February 3rd a national holiday:
Hell, the Socialist priesthood never even celebrated the centennial of the law that gave them political power, and made them rich to boot. I guess they knew that the rest of us wouldnt sing Happy Birthday; so they ignored the whole thing.
Frankly, the wealth-creators should declare February 3rd a day of mourning. Of course it would be inappropriate for mourners to sing Happy Birthday, but they could play the Funeral March for a Marionette. Move the cursor to 1:46 to start the music:
If you watched the video you saw an assortment of freaks bury the marionette; i.e. THE COUNTRY. That is definitely a perfect analogy. What better way to describe a once-free people being buried by puppeteers with so much power they no longer have to manipulate marionettes.
marionette (noun)
A jointed puppet manipulated from above by strings or wires attached to its limbs.
On the other hand the puppeteer is very generous to his favorite freaks. If ever there was a law designed for creative bookkeeping it is this:
Thanks to an assortment of laws the education industry gets the most money from the income tax. One might even accuse the ED (Department of Education) of being the puppeteer. However, Hollywood does as much harm as does the ED only in a different way. Basically, the education industry can make a case for educating children albeit a false case. In addition to unconstitutional authority, teachers pervert their mandate with brainwashing and indoctrinating children into the Socialist religion, but thats a topic for another thread.
The ED has its phoney justification, but there is no justification for subsidizing the entertainment industry in any way. Calling it art is their primary justification when it is a business from top to bottom and should be treated as such.
NOTE: Art runs a close second to the children when it comes to parasites hustling tax dollars. Even if you believe motion pictures are an art form the government has no business forcing taxpayers to subsidize an "art" a majority of Americans want no part of.
Bottom line: If movie producers fail to sell their product they should eat the loss, not lay it off on taxpayers before or after the fact.
I wont ask how much money movie makers pay in taxes when they produce a blockbuster. I have a hunch creative bookkeeping determines the tax liability for successes and flops.
Hell, the Socialist priesthood never even celebrated the centennial of the law that gave them political power, and made them rich to boot. I guess they knew that the rest of us wouldnt sing Happy Birthday; so they ignored the whole thing.
Frankly, the wealth-creators should declare February 3rd a day of mourning. Of course it would be inappropriate for mourners to sing Happy Birthday, but they could play the Funeral March for a Marionette. Move the cursor to 1:46 to start the music:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKi01rPexBI&feature=player_embedded]Funeral March for a Marionette - YouTube[/ame]
If you watched the video you saw an assortment of freaks bury the marionette; i.e. THE COUNTRY. That is definitely a perfect analogy. What better way to describe a once-free people being buried by puppeteers with so much power they no longer have to manipulate marionettes.
marionette (noun)
A jointed puppet manipulated from above by strings or wires attached to its limbs.
On the other hand the puppeteer is very generous to his favorite freaks. If ever there was a law designed for creative bookkeeping it is this:
Thanks to an assortment of laws the education industry gets the most money from the income tax. One might even accuse the ED (Department of Education) of being the puppeteer. However, Hollywood does as much harm as does the ED only in a different way. Basically, the education industry can make a case for educating children albeit a false case. In addition to unconstitutional authority, teachers pervert their mandate with brainwashing and indoctrinating children into the Socialist religion, but thats a topic for another thread.
The ED has its phoney justification, but there is no justification for subsidizing the entertainment industry in any way. Calling it art is their primary justification when it is a business from top to bottom and should be treated as such.
NOTE: Art runs a close second to the children when it comes to parasites hustling tax dollars. Even if you believe motion pictures are an art form the government has no business forcing taxpayers to subsidize an "art" a majority of Americans want no part of.
Bottom line: If movie producers fail to sell their product they should eat the loss, not lay it off on taxpayers before or after the fact.
I wont ask how much money movie makers pay in taxes when they produce a blockbuster. I have a hunch creative bookkeeping determines the tax liability for successes and flops.
