Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss?
Why should I care about your crazy claims?
Kook, I know how to handle you, and that frustrates you to no end. It's a given that you'll lie about what everyone else says, and use to the lies to try to drag them down into a pissing match. But I don't have to play that game. I just keep laughing and returning to the point you're running from, to watch you have a meltdown over it.
Your kook theory says that a white room can't possibly be brighter than a dark room with the same light source, because it would be "multiplying energy". That's the point. Can you explain to us how the white room manages to be brighter without having more light flux than the black room?
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss?
Why should I care about your crazy claims?
Kook, I know how to handle you, and that frustrates you to no end. It's a given that you'll lie about what everyone else says, and use to the lies to try to drag them down into a pissing match. But I don't have to play that game. I just keep laughing and returning to the point you're running from, to watch you have a meltdown over it.
Your kook theory says that a white room can't possibly be brighter than a dark room with the same light source, because it would be "multiplying energy". That's the point. Can you explain to us how the white room manages to be brighter without having more light flux than the black room?
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss?
Why should I care about your crazy claims?
Kook, I know how to handle you, and that frustrates you to no end. It's a given that you'll lie about what everyone else says, and use to the lies to try to drag them down into a pissing match. But I don't have to play that game. I just keep laughing and returning to the point you're running from, to watch you have a meltdown over it.
Your kook theory says that a white room can't possibly be brighter than a dark room with the same light source, because it would be "multiplying energy". That's the point. Can you explain to us how the white room manages to be brighter without having more light flux than the black room?
This thread has gotten pretty hilarious. I think PeanutBrain and the slackjawedidiot wiil next claim that ice is invisible because their eyeballs are warmer than the ice, therefore no radiation can travel from the cold ice to anything warmer without 'violating' the 2nd law of thermodynamics. LOLOLOL. It's like watching some kind of Special mental Olympics for complete retards. They try so hard but they 'run' in circles and trip over their own tongues and in the end, they're still utterly confused and massively retarded.
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss? No..LOLQuote: Originally Posted by mamooth
Quote: Originally Posted by SSDD
The energy flux between the mirrors never even reaches the output of the flashlight..much less become many times greater.
And thus SSDD proves that a laser oscillator can't exist.
Fascinating, how the conspiracy just keeps growing and growing, all because a group of manchildren can't admit to getting anything wrong, ever. Thus, ever deeper into the stupid hole they dig.
Quote:
Pulsed Laser Oscillator
The Neodynium-YAG laser consists of a rod of the material which can be pumped by a flash lamp at a rate of about 15 Hz. The output is Q-switched and mode-locked with the use of a saturable absorber and an acoustooptical modulator. The output consists of an envelope of pulses which can be tuned for optimization by adjusting the mirrors, adjusting the prisms to change optical pathlength, adjusting the crystal in the acoustooptic modulator, and adjusting the frequency of the modulator.
Q-Switching
Q-switching for a laser refers to techniques for obtaining brief, high-energy pulses rather than continuous wave operation. This helps the operation of a pulsed laser oscillator. The basic idea is that for only a brief time is the beam allowed to pass back and forth between the mirrors to achieve the laser action, but the pumping action is continuous so that a large population inversion is waiting when the lasing condition is satisfied. The Q-switching is typically accomplished with an acoustooptic coupler or an electrooptical device.
Quote:mamooth
Anyways, let's get back to common sense. If I hang a light bulb in a room with mirrors on all sides, it's going to get very bright in there, as the light reflects from the mirrors many times. Much brighter than the bulb alone could make. A sane person would not call that "creating energy", and an honest person would not claim it won't get brighter than a bulb alone.
Quote: Originally Posted by gslack
Energy flux is a rate of energy transfer, either by density as in per unit area, or used for a total rate.. Thats energy transfer dipshit.. Get it yet? Hence energy is being transferred, and unless you have a perfect mirror you have been hiding from the rest of the scientific community, there is a loss in that transfer.
DUDE STOP CHANGING YOUR ARGUMENT WE SAW WHAT YOU SAID BEFORE.. Everyone saw it, pretending it's something else now is too late..Quote:mamooth
Well sure, there's a "loss", because the total heat flow is from hot to cool, as the second law demands. But, contrary to your retard version of the second law -- the one that contradicts the last century of science -- there's no problem with some heat flowing back to hot, just as long as more heat flows out to cold.
Blah, blah, blah... All I see is you trying to BS your way out of your previous claim...You can't moron,you already proved your an imbecile... NEXT!Quote:mamooth
You can't get 117% work out of the that system, beyond a short term where you use up the stored energy. Hence, like the light bouncing between mirrors, it's not creating energy, it's just storing previously generated energy. If you think it's creating energy, then simply show us your system that would harvest that 117% energy beyond the short-term. If you can't, have the decency to slither away in disgrace. Or admit you're wrong, but since you toddlers can't admit an error, ever, slinking away seems your best option.
Why should I care about your crazy claims?
Kook, I know how to handle you, and that frustrates you to no end. It's a given that you'll lie about what everyone else says, and use to the lies to try to drag them down into a pissing match. But I don't have to play that game. I just keep laughing and returning to the point you're running from, to watch you have a meltdown over it.
Your kook theory says that a white room can't possibly be brighter than a dark room with the same light source, because it would be "multiplying energy". That's the point. Can you explain to us how the white room manages to be brighter without having more light flux than the black room?
This thread has gotten pretty hilarious. I think PeanutBrain and the slackjawedidiot wiil next claim that ice is invisible because their eyeballs are warmer than the ice, therefore no radiation can travel from the cold ice to anything warmer without 'violating' the 2nd law of thermodynamics. LOLOLOL. It's like watching some kind of Special mental Olympics for complete retards. They try so hard but they 'run' in circles and trip over their own tongues and in the end, they're still utterly confused and massively retarded.
Keep burying it troll... I will re-post as needed..
This thread has gotten pretty hilarious. I think PeanutBrain and the slackjawedidiot wiil next claim that ice is invisible because their eyeballs are warmer than the ice, therefore no radiation can travel from the cold ice to anything warmer without 'violating' the 2nd law of thermodynamics. LOLOLOL. It's like watching some kind of Special mental Olympics for complete retards. They try so hard but they 'run' in circles and trip over their own tongues and in the end, they're still utterly confused and massively retarded.
Keep burying it troll... I will re-post as needed..
LOLOLOLOLOLOL......oh, slackjawed, all you ever post or repost is just more evidence of your own insanity and retarded ignorance.
Keep burying it troll... I will re-post as needed..
LOLOLOLOLOLOL......oh, slackjawed, all you ever post or repost is just more evidence of your own insanity and retarded ignorance.
Yes and your attempt to bury juniors screw up is painfully obvious... Keep going, and I will keep re-posting.
What degree in science do you have? I mean serious back ground within physics and the atmosphere....
Unless you're sitting next to James Hansen no one will listen to you.
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss? No..LOLQuote: Originally Posted by mamooth
Quote: Originally Posted by SSDD
The energy flux between the mirrors never even reaches the output of the flashlight..much less become many times greater.
And thus SSDD proves that a laser oscillator can't exist.
Fascinating, how the conspiracy just keeps growing and growing, all because a group of manchildren can't admit to getting anything wrong, ever. Thus, ever deeper into the stupid hole they dig.
Quote:
Pulsed Laser Oscillator
The Neodynium-YAG laser consists of a rod of the material which can be pumped by a flash lamp at a rate of about 15 Hz. The output is Q-switched and mode-locked with the use of a saturable absorber and an acoustooptical modulator. The output consists of an envelope of pulses which can be tuned for optimization by adjusting the mirrors, adjusting the prisms to change optical pathlength, adjusting the crystal in the acoustooptic modulator, and adjusting the frequency of the modulator.
Q-Switching
Q-switching for a laser refers to techniques for obtaining brief, high-energy pulses rather than continuous wave operation. This helps the operation of a pulsed laser oscillator. The basic idea is that for only a brief time is the beam allowed to pass back and forth between the mirrors to achieve the laser action, but the pumping action is continuous so that a large population inversion is waiting when the lasing condition is satisfied. The Q-switching is typically accomplished with an acoustooptic coupler or an electrooptical device.
Quote:mamooth
Anyways, let's get back to common sense. If I hang a light bulb in a room with mirrors on all sides, it's going to get very bright in there, as the light reflects from the mirrors many times. Much brighter than the bulb alone could make. A sane person would not call that "creating energy", and an honest person would not claim it won't get brighter than a bulb alone.
Quote: Originally Posted by gslack
Energy flux is a rate of energy transfer, either by density as in per unit area, or used for a total rate.. Thats energy transfer dipshit.. Get it yet? Hence energy is being transferred, and unless you have a perfect mirror you have been hiding from the rest of the scientific community, there is a loss in that transfer.
DUDE STOP CHANGING YOUR ARGUMENT WE SAW WHAT YOU SAID BEFORE.. Everyone saw it, pretending it's something else now is too late..Quote:mamooth
Well sure, there's a "loss", because the total heat flow is from hot to cool, as the second law demands. But, contrary to your retard version of the second law -- the one that contradicts the last century of science -- there's no problem with some heat flowing back to hot, just as long as more heat flows out to cold.
Blah, blah, blah... All I see is you trying to BS your way out of your previous claim...You can't moron,you already proved your an imbecile... NEXT!Quote:mamooth
You can't get 117% work out of the that system, beyond a short term where you use up the stored energy. Hence, like the light bouncing between mirrors, it's not creating energy, it's just storing previously generated energy. If you think it's creating energy, then simply show us your system that would harvest that 117% energy beyond the short-term. If you can't, have the decency to slither away in disgrace. Or admit you're wrong, but since you toddlers can't admit an error, ever, slinking away seems your best option.
Yes a ridiculous man-child that would be you we know this..Know what a laser oscillator is? Or what it does? Does make an infinity laser? Or a laser that can be reflected over and over suffering no energy loss? No..LOLQuote: Originally Posted by mamooth
Quote: Originally Posted by SSDD
The energy flux between the mirrors never even reaches the output of the flashlight..much less become many times greater.
And thus SSDD proves that a laser oscillator can't exist.
Fascinating, how the conspiracy just keeps growing and growing, all because a group of manchildren can't admit to getting anything wrong, ever. Thus, ever deeper into the stupid hole they dig.
Read up on things for once will ya? Seriously you have a history of making bold claims based on little to no understanding of it. This should be a lesson to you...
Laser Oscillators
MORON!!! Lasers, the type of laser you are referring to is pulsed. Meaning the beam is pulsed at a very fast rate, appearing to be a constant and continuous beam to the naked eye. They are done this way because perfect reflectors do not exist and at every transfer or redirection of a beam there will be some energy loss in that transfer. By pulsing the beam they can get the near same effect visually, meaning you won't see a separation in the beam under normal conditions, despite the fact there is not actually one continuous beam but rather a series of very fast pulses of light, grouped so quickly together you won't see the difference.Quote:
Pulsed Laser Oscillator
The Neodynium-YAG laser consists of a rod of the material which can be pumped by a flash lamp at a rate of about 15 Hz. The output is Q-switched and mode-locked with the use of a saturable absorber and an acoustooptical modulator. The output consists of an envelope of pulses which can be tuned for optimization by adjusting the mirrors, adjusting the prisms to change optical pathlength, adjusting the crystal in the acoustooptic modulator, and adjusting the frequency of the modulator.
Q-Switching
Q-switching for a laser refers to techniques for obtaining brief, high-energy pulses rather than continuous wave operation. This helps the operation of a pulsed laser oscillator. The basic idea is that for only a brief time is the beam allowed to pass back and forth between the mirrors to achieve the laser action, but the pumping action is continuous so that a large population inversion is waiting when the lasing condition is satisfied. The Q-switching is typically accomplished with an acoustooptic coupler or an electrooptical device.
Imagine taking your flashlight and turning it on and off at a rate so fast it appears as if its constantly on.. Ever wave a flashlight back forth quickly? Why? Because it made the light look like it was a streak of light, a little kid laser of sorts.
There is a loss at each transfer, but it is continually replenished by another pulse of light, quicker than you can see with the naked eye and given the impression of a solid and continuous beam. IDIOT!
STOP CITING THINGS YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!
Again??? LOL, dude you are too stupid for words... Best shut up and wait for Ian to save you. Frankly I think he has learned the depths of your ignorance and has forsaken you.. What you are doing is changing your claim again.. Grow up admiral...
DUDE STOP CHANGING YOUR ARGUMENT WE SAW WHAT YOU SAID BEFORE.. Everyone saw it, pretending it's something else now is too late..Quote:mamooth
Well sure, there's a "loss", because the total heat flow is from hot to cool, as the second law demands. But, contrary to your retard version of the second law -- the one that contradicts the last century of science -- there's no problem with some heat flowing back to hot, just as long as more heat flows out to cold.
Blah, blah, blah... All I see is you trying to BS your way out of your previous claim...You can't moron,you already proved your an imbecile... NEXT!Quote:mamooth
You can't get 117% work out of the that system, beyond a short term where you use up the stored energy. Hence, like the light bouncing between mirrors, it's not creating energy, it's just storing previously generated energy. If you think it's creating energy, then simply show us your system that would harvest that 117% energy beyond the short-term. If you can't, have the decency to slither away in disgrace. Or admit you're wrong, but since you toddlers can't admit an error, ever, slinking away seems your best option.
Now care to explain why you ignored the post? LOL we know junior we know...
One more time because the troll army keeps trying to bury it..
Don`t forget to re-post this :I'll keep mocking you for it, you'll cry about how mean I am, and I'll laugh hard. Isn't life grand?
Why are car radiators painted black
Any other 'tards here want to back up PolarBear's nutty claim about how a dark object radiates more at the same temperature?
If only the world knew that they could make heat sinks more effective by painting them flat black. Once more, PolarBear has made an amazing new discovery in physics that the rest of humanity had somehow missed.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/279415-agw-atmospheric-physics-98.html#post7206966Why are car radiators painted black?
Car radiators are painted black because it emits the most heat through radiation (highest emissivity). This improves the heat transfer out of the radiator when air isn't moving through the radiator.
But if you do then the freaks reply:I stand in front of mirror, holding a flashlight and another mirror at my chest. I shine a flashlight into the mirror. Photons start bouncing back and forth between the two mirrors. After multiple bounces between the two mirrors, the "energy flux" between the two mirrors becomes many times greater than that of the flashlight beam alone.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/279415-agw-atmospheric-physics-88.html#post7140363
Quote: Originally Posted by polarbear
Figure that one out.
If the "Nuclear Admiral" switches the
Reported for spamming. Enough is enough
Isn't life grand?
I actually suggested yesterday
Reporting is probably the best option - along with neg repping.
We sure could use some of that "back radiation" between that white stuff on the ground and these white clouds.Tonight's Finale: Newfoundland glowing on a lovely Spring evening.
I wonder if that gem came from "skeptical science" or straight out of the shit for brains kitty litter boxThat visible light is going to hit the walls, and 80% will bounce off. And that reflected light will hit the walls again, and 64% will bounce. And so on. By the infinite summation formula, we can calculate the final light flux at 1/(1-.8) = 5 times the luminous flux
Luminous intensity should not be confused with another photometric unit, luminous flux, which is the total perceived power emitted in all directions. Luminous intensity is the perceived power per unit solid angle. Luminous intensity is also not the same as the radiant intensity, the corresponding objective physical quantity used in the measurement science of radiometry.
In photometry, luminous flux or luminous power is the measure of the perceived power of light. It differs from radiant flux, the measure of the total power of light emitted, in that luminous flux is adjusted to reflect the varying sensitivity of the human eye to different wavelengths of light.
Luminance is a photometric measure of the luminous intensity per unit area of light travelling in a given direction. It describes the amount of light that passes through or is emitted from a particular area, and falls within a given solid angle. The SI unit for luminance is candela per square metre (cd/m2).
The candela is the luminous intensity, in a given direction, of a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency 540×1012 hertz and that has a radiant intensity in that direction of 1⁄683 watt per steradian.
Luminous intensity should not be confused with another photometric unit, luminous flux, which is the total perceived power emitted in all directions. Luminous intensity is the perceived power per unit solid angle. Luminous intensity is also not the same as the radiant intensity, the corresponding objective physical quantity used in the measurement science of radiometry.
That visible light is going to hit the walls, and 80% will bounce off. And that reflected light will hit the walls again, and 64% will bounce. And so on. By the infinite summation formula, we can calculate the final light flux at 1/(1-.8) = 5 times the luminous flux
According toLuminance is a photometric measure of the luminous intensity per unit area of light travelling in a given direction. It describes the amount of light that passes through or is emitted from a particular area, and falls within a given solid angle. The SI unit for luminance is candela per square metre (cd/m2).
The candela is the luminous intensity, in a given direction, of a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency 540×1012 hertz and that has a radiant intensity in that direction of 1⁄683 watt per steradian.
Luminous intensity should not be confused with another photometric unit, luminous flux, which is the total perceived power emitted in all directions. Luminous intensity is the perceived power per unit solid angle. Luminous intensity is also not the same as the radiant intensity, the corresponding objective physical quantity used in the measurement science of radiometry
Me?...I used to run nuclear reactors
Unbelievable how stupid some people can be ...
Using a 100 watt light bulb in a room designed by "mamooth" can be pumped up in 1 second with 500 watt seconds instead of 100 watt seconds....and that`s whats happening just between 2 walls.
Gslack, spamming is against board rules. Cut it out.
Plus, there's the matter that no one can figure out what you're babbling about. Only your fellow psychostalker PolarBear wants anything to do with you. The saner denialists don't want to be associated with your stalking, that's how bad you've gotten.
Anyways, if you can locate your balls, try addressing the way I ripped about your retarded "117% flux means multiplying energy!" stupidity with my simple white room example. I correctly take the fact you won't even try as your admission of surrender on that point.
Gslack, spamming is against board rules. Cut it out.
Plus, there's the matter that no one can figure out what you're babbling about. Only your fellow psychostalker PolarBear wants anything to do with you. The saner denialists don't want to be associated with your stalking, that's how bad you've gotten.
Anyways, if you can locate your balls, try addressing the way I ripped about your retarded "117% flux means multiplying energy!" stupidity with my simple white room example. I correctly take the fact you won't even try as your admission of surrender on that point.
Don't talk to me about board rules weasel, you are dodging the post again... I will re-post as I feel schmuck, and you can go cry to a mod again.
You have been caught ONCE AGAIN, talking about things you do not understand, and making bold claims you don't have the knowledge on..
If you could have made an excuse for it you would have by now,you don't and can't so now you resort to appeals to authority and crying about the rules.
You're done admiral.. You're a proven fraud, a fake, and a liar, and completely dishonest, and now we can add incessant, whiny little punk to that.. Good day admiral, your credibility is zero..
You have been caught ONCE AGAIN, talking about things you do not understand, and making bold claims you don't have the knowledge on..
If you could have made an excuse for it you would have by now, you don't and can't so now you resort to appeals to authority and crying about the rules.
You're done admiral.. You're a proven fraud, a fake, and a liar, and completely dishonest, and now we can add incessant, whiny little punk to that.. Good day admiral, your credibility is zero..
this moron paints his room white so it`s a "photon capacitor" which tanks up with 5 times more photons than what`s coming at any time from the light bulb in his room...
You have been caught ONCE AGAIN, talking about things you do not understand, and making bold claims you don't have the knowledge on..
You'd look less crazy if your magnum opus post that supposedly skewered me didn't closely resemble the Unibomber Manifesto.
I don't have to respond line-by-line to any Unibomber Manifesto to refute it. I just need to point out that it's crank nonsense created by a craven retard, and laugh my ass off at it. Oh, I'm sure you think it's a truly impressive piece of work, but so did the Unibomber.
If you could have made an excuse for it you would have by now, you don't and can't so now you resort to appeals to authority and crying about the rules.
I just politely asked you to behave like a grownup for once. Clearly, that was too much to expect of you.
You're done admiral.. You're a proven fraud, a fake, and a liar, and completely dishonest, and now we can add incessant, whiny little punk to that.. Good day admiral, your credibility is zero..
You realize you're comic relief now, right? I just sit here pulling your strings, and watching how my happy little puppet dances.
And again, when you locate your balls, you can start talking about the science. I'll keep trying to bring you back to the point that you're running from. Which is that your "117% flux means multiplying energy!" claim is really stupid, as my simple example showed. Even you know that by now, as your refusal to discuss the issue indicates.
