An Open Letter to [email protected] (Hillary)

Antares

A Rooincarnation
Nov 7, 2012
10,139
1,247
245
Omaha
"WASHINGTON — SINCE open lettersto secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:"

"If you, Hillary Rodham Clinton, are willing to cite your mother’s funeral to get sympathy for ill-advisedly deleting 30,000 emails, it just makes us want to sigh: O.K., just take it. If you want it that bad, go ahead and be president and leave us in peace. (Or war, if you have your hawkish way.) You’re still idling on the runway, but we’re already jet-lagged."It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”
<snip>

Instead of raising us up by behaving like exemplary, sterling people, you bring us down to your own level, a place of blurred lines and fungible ethics and sleazy associates. Your family’s foundation gobbles tens of millions from Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes, whose unspoken message is: “We’re going to give you money to go improve the world. Now leave us alone to go persecute women.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/o...open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=0

Maureen O'Dowd is going after your Queen Bitch.....all is not well in Demville.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
"None of what you said made any sense. Keeping a single account mingling business and personal with your own server wasn’t about “convenience.” It was about expedience. You became judge and jury on what’s relevant because you didn’t want to leave digital fingerprints for others to retrace. You could have had Huma carry two devices if you really couldn’t hoist an extra few ounces. You insisted on piggybacking on Bill’s server, even though his aides were worried about hackers, because you were gaming the system for 2016. (Or even 2012.)"
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Instead of raising us up by behaving like exemplary, sterling people, you bring us down to your own level, a place of blurred lines and fungible ethics and sleazy associates. Your family’s foundation gobbles tens of millions from Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes, whose unspoken message is: “We’re going to give you money to go improve the world. Now leave us alone to go persecute women.”
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
"Hillary, your syndrome is less mortal, more regal, a matter of “What Is Hillary Owed?” Ronald Reagan seemed like an ancient king, as one aide put it, gliding across the landscape. "You seem like an annoyed queen, radiating irritation at anyone who tries to hold you accountable. You’re less rhetorically talented than Bill but more controlling, so it’s harder for you to navigate out of tough spots.
 
"WASHINGTON — SINCE open lettersto secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:"

"If you, Hillary Rodham Clinton, are willing to cite your mother’s funeral to get sympathy for ill-advisedly deleting 30,000 emails, it just makes us want to sigh: O.K., just take it. If you want it that bad, go ahead and be president and leave us in peace. (Or war, if you have your hawkish way.) You’re still idling on the runway, but we’re already jet-lagged."It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”
<snip>

Instead of raising us up by behaving like exemplary, sterling people, you bring us down to your own level, a place of blurred lines and fungible ethics and sleazy associates. Your family’s foundation gobbles tens of millions from Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes, whose unspoken message is: “We’re going to give you money to go improve the world. Now leave us alone to go persecute women.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/o...open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=0

Maureen O'Dowd is going after your Queen Bitch.....all is not well in Demville.
How will poor Hillary survive that? Well, maybe like everything else people throw at her, by politely saying, Fuck You and the Horse you rode in in.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The Left is going after her now, it will be fun to watch.
 
"WASHINGTON — SINCE open lettersto secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:"

"If you, Hillary Rodham Clinton, are willing to cite your mother’s funeral to get sympathy for ill-advisedly deleting 30,000 emails, it just makes us want to sigh: O.K., just take it. If you want it that bad, go ahead and be president and leave us in peace. (Or war, if you have your hawkish way.) You’re still idling on the runway, but we’re already jet-lagged."It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”
<snip>

Instead of raising us up by behaving like exemplary, sterling people, you bring us down to your own level, a place of blurred lines and fungible ethics and sleazy associates. Your family’s foundation gobbles tens of millions from Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes, whose unspoken message is: “We’re going to give you money to go improve the world. Now leave us alone to go persecute women.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/o...open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=0

Maureen O'Dowd is going after your Queen Bitch.....all is not well in Demville.
How will poor Hillary survive that? Well, maybe like everything else people throw at her, by politely saying, Fuck You and the Horse you rode in in.

I don't trust how the media plays these games.
Elevating someone high, just to tear them down.
Now tearing them down, to build them back up.

How do you know this isn't a ploy for throwing people off the horse early on in the race, getting all the worst negative stuff out first then pretend to smooth it over for a false sense of resolution, so they can be superglued into their saddles and pushed the rest of the way, using this incident to show how tough they are that they can survive such "attacks." Don't trust this at all.

The real govt changes are going to come from the people unifying on real solutions on the grassroots level, and handing marching orders to the servants in govt who are supposed to represent the people, not dictate for us.

This game in the media is just to play with public perception of who's in charge. But the people really need to take charge and quit gambling on horses in a race we don't control, that is completely rigged by the bookies.
Not for sustainable solutions or changes, but to make money off the media hype over conflicts and fears of one party by the other, to stir up ratings, donations and votes. But totally distracting from any meaningful reforms.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
"WASHINGTON — SINCE open lettersto secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:"

"If you, Hillary Rodham Clinton, are willing to cite your mother’s funeral to get sympathy for ill-advisedly deleting 30,000 emails, it just makes us want to sigh: O.K., just take it. If you want it that bad, go ahead and be president and leave us in peace. (Or war, if you have your hawkish way.) You’re still idling on the runway, but we’re already jet-lagged."It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”
<snip>

Instead of raising us up by behaving like exemplary, sterling people, you bring us down to your own level, a place of blurred lines and fungible ethics and sleazy associates. Your family’s foundation gobbles tens of millions from Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes, whose unspoken message is: “We’re going to give you money to go improve the world. Now leave us alone to go persecute women.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/o...open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=0

Maureen O'Dowd is going after your Queen Bitch.....all is not well in Demville.
How will poor Hillary survive that? Well, maybe like everything else people throw at her, by politely saying, Fuck You and the Horse you rode in in.

I don't trust how the media plays these games.
Elevating someone high, just to tear them down.
Now tearing them down, to build them back up.

How do you know this isn't a ploy for throwing people off the horse early on in the race, getting all the worst negative stuff out first then pretend to smooth it over for a false sense of resolution, so they can be superglued into their saddles and pushed the rest of the way, using this incident to show how tough they are that they can survive such "attacks." Don't trust this at all.

The real govt changes are going to come from the people unifying on real solutions on the grassroots level, and handing marching orders to the servants in govt who are supposed to represent the people, not dictate for us.

This game in the media is just to play with public perception of who's in charge. But the people really need to take charge and quit gambling on horses in a race we don't control, that is completely rigged by the bookies.
Not for sustainable solutions or changes, but to make money off the media hype over conflicts and fears of one party by the other, to stir up ratings, donations and votes. But totally distracting from any meaningful reforms.

It's possible,but I don't think so.

She is an incompetent bitch and the World see's it.

She has traded on her husbands name and protected a serial sexual predator...she is no Champion for Women.
 

Forum List

Back
Top