Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Indictments are not crimes... you can indict a ham sandwich...Read the indictments yet?
No?
Don't bother me in this topic until you do.
This is not a question of "qualified immunity", it's a question of extending "absolute immunity". These are different doctrines. I think we need to be VERY careful about who gets immunity for what. When you provide immunity to someone was powerful as the president, you are opening ourselves up to so many problems.The doctrine of absolute presidential immunity already exists. He's not arguing for that. He's asking if the existing doctrine "includes immunity from criminal prosecution for a President’s official acts, i.e., those performed within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.'" It was right in the portion you quoted.
I was insulted by your accusation that I have no problem with political persecutions. I tried to move on. You can't seem to let it go.I asked the question becasue you were doing your bullshit insulting condescending routine. Which is truly getting old
You and your cult sure are having a hard time finding ham sandwiches!Indictments are not crimes... you can indict a ham sandwich...
... take a break kid...Don't bother me in this topic until you do
I just finished one.... my "cult" is going to take back the country...You and your cult sure are having a hard time finding ham sandwiches!
Well, a very large percentage of the country believes your cult's abuse of the judicial system for political purposes is a huge problem.This is not a question of "qualified immunity", it's a question of extending "absolute immunity". These are different doctrines. I think we need to be VERY careful about who gets immunity for what. When you provide immunity to someone was powerful as the president, you are opening ourselves up to so many problems.
You don't have a problem with them. You said the victim "will be fine" Again, you would feel differently if your son was falsely accused of rape.I was insulted by your accusation that I have no problem with political persecutions. I tried to move on. You can't seem to let it go.
Illegally trying to overturn election results is not just "doing your job" you ignorant dirtball.Who would want to run for office if you could be prosecuted for doing your job after you leave office... WTF people... do you want a president or a captive?....
There’s a reason we don’t subject criminality to popular votes. We aren’t supposed to let popularity determine guilt or innocence.Well, a very large percentage of the country believes your cult's abuse of the judicial system for political process is a huge problem.
Of course I’d have a problem with it but I wouldn’t try to create a doctrine to immunity for accused rapists.Again, you would feel differently if your son was falsely accused of rape.
But he "will be fine" so why would you have a problem with it?There’s a reason we don’t subject criminality to popular votes. We aren’t supposed to let popularity determine guilt or innocence.
Of course I’d have a problem with it but I wouldn’t try to create a doctrine to immunity for accused rapists.
He won’t be convicted and maybe could even file a civil suit for the persecution if they violated his rights.But he "will be fine" so why would you have a problem with it?
It is if you truly believe the election results are fraudulent... don't forget Mike we never held an election like the covid rules election... the Supreme court will show it was in his job duties as president... you don't want hamstrung presidents in America because congress and the courts will take over... not a good thing for any of us...Illegally trying to overturn election results is not just "doing your job" you ignorant dirtball.
Quit trying to normalize abberant criminal behavior with simple language.
34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.Tell what they are... none of you can...
Charges not convictions... should you be fired from your job and jailed because you enemy made accusations about you?...34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
2 felony counts (including one conspiracy count) of obstructing an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512
|
1 felony count of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371
|
1 felony count of conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241
1 count of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
|
3 counts of solicitation of violation of oath by public officer
|
1 count of conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer
|
2 counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree
|
2 counts of false statements and writings
|
2 counts of conspiracy to commit false statements and writings
|
1 count of filing false documents
|
1 count of conspiracy to commit filing false documents
32 felony counts of willful retention of national defense information in violation of the Espionage Act
|
6 felony counts of obstruction-related crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 1512 and 18 U.S.C. § 1519
|
2 felony counts of false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001
One count of too much makeup34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
2 felony counts (including one conspiracy count) of obstructing an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512
|
1 felony count of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371
|
1 felony count of conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241
1 count of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
|
3 counts of solicitation of violation of oath by public officer
|
1 count of conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer
|
2 counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree
|
2 counts of false statements and writings
|
2 counts of conspiracy to commit false statements and writings
|
1 count of filing false documents
|
1 count of conspiracy to commit filing false documents
32 felony counts of willful retention of national defense information in violation of the Espionage Act
|
6 felony counts of obstruction-related crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 1512 and 18 U.S.C. § 1519
|
2 felony counts of false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001
Concentrate massive amounts of power and little accountability into one person.It is if you truly believe the election results are fraudulent... don't forget Mike we never held an election like the covid rules election... the Supreme court will show it was in his job duties as president... you don't want hamstrung presidents in America because congress and the courts will take over... not a good thing for any of us...
Read our constitution....Concentrate massive amounts of power and little accountability into one person.
What could go wrong!
No question about it. He deserves a trial because he is not immune from criminal prosecution.None of that has been proven... we are innocent until PROVEN guilty
Maybe, instead of just quoting directly from one of Trump's assinine Truth Social posts you could actually link to some "respected legal scholar's" opinion explaining why Bragg's charges aren't solid.OK. I'll bite. There isn't a single respected legal scholar that says the Bragg charge are solid.