Angry Donald and his supporters

It's common for campaigns to speak to foreign dignitaries, Obama even went off shore. No wonder you hate Trump, you're ignorant.

There's a big difference. Usually a campaign will make a photo-op of the meeting, and invite the press to cover the occasion. Instead Trump associates met with foreigners behind closed doors, in secret, and denied the meetings ever happened.
how does one do that over the phone?
 
Actually that depends on what they said in those meetings, and what they said when those meetings were investigated by the FBI.
...and nothing wrong was found.

Could you post where anybody from the FBI said they found nothing? They're busy issuing subpoenas and convening grand juries. So it looks like they found something.
ah but is it a illegal? have you asked yourself that yet?

BTW, it isn't.
 
Instead Trump associates met with foreigners behind closed doors, in secret, and denied the meetings ever happened.
Source? The last guy said that but his links said phone calls and emails..

Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

National Security
Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose
and what? was it illegal? nope. so what now?
 
Usually a campaign will make a photo-op of the meeting, and invite the press to cover the occasion..
how does one do that over the phone?

http://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/...52736844-rc1199dd81f0-rtrmadp-3-usa-trump.jpg

2017-01-28t171625z-52736844-rc1199dd81f0-rtrmadp-3-usa-trump.jpg
 
Instead Trump associates met with foreigners behind closed doors, in secret, and denied the meetings ever happened.
Source? The last guy said that but his links said phone calls and emails..

Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

National Security
Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose
Yes, in an official capacity. Old news hashed to death.
 
Actually that depends on what they said in those meetings, and what they said when those meetings were investigated by the FBI.
...and nothing wrong was found.

Could you post where anybody from the FBI said they found nothing? They're busy issuing subpoenas and convening grand juries. So it looks like they found something.
LOL, it doesn't work that way genius. If no one has evidence normal people don't see a cover up.
 
ah but is it a illegal? have you asked yourself that yet?

BTW, it isn't.

It can be anything from violation of the Logan act, to conspiracy to disclose illegal communication intercepts. Plus if they lied to the FBI, that adds another felony.
 
ah but is it a illegal? have you asked yourself that yet?

BTW, it isn't.

It can be anything from violation of the Logan act, to conspiracy to disclose illegal communication intercepts. Plus if they lied to the FBI, that adds another felony.
but no it can't. so, again, what is it you think you got? besides a fairytale?
 
Could you post where anybody from the FBI said they found nothing?
LOL, it doesn't work that way genius. If no one has evidence normal people don't see a cover up.

If there was no evidence as you claim, the FBI would have announced it, and closed the investigation. Just like they made that announcement about Anthony Weiners laptop.
there isn't any crime, nor is anything being investigated illegal. so what is it you think is going to happen?
 
It can be anything from violation of the Logan act, to conspiracy to disclose illegal communication intercepts. Plus if they lied to the FBI, that adds another felony.
but no it can't. so, again, what is it you think you got? besides a fairytale?
Post something to back up that those charges can't be made against Trump associates, especially Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone.
 
It can be anything from violation of the Logan act, to conspiracy to disclose illegal communication intercepts. Plus if they lied to the FBI, that adds another felony.
but no it can't. so, again, what is it you think you got? besides a fairytale?
Post something to back up that those charges can't be made against Trump associates, especially Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone.
what's that have to do with trump? you claim trump. that ain't trump. and again, it isn't illegal.
 
If there was no evidence as you claim, the FBI would have announced it, and closed the investigation. Just like they made that announcement about Anthony Weiners laptop.
there isn't any crime, nor is anything being investigated illegal. so what is it you think is going to happen?
The FBI only investigates crimes, their charter is in law enforcement. Maybe you have them confused with the intelligence agencies, that collect information.
 
If there was no evidence as you claim, the FBI would have announced it, and closed the investigation. Just like they made that announcement about Anthony Weiners laptop.
there isn't any crime, nor is anything being investigated illegal. so what is it you think is going to happen?
The FBI only investigates crimes, their charter is in law enforcement. Maybe you have them confused with the intelligence agencies, that collect information.
ok, what is the crime they are investigating then?
 
Post something to back up that those charges can't be made against Trump associates, especially Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone.
what's that have to do with trump? you claim trump. that ain't trump. and again, it isn't illegal.

I never said anything about charging Trump. We're talking Trump campaign associates being investigated by the FBI.
 
Post something to back up that those charges can't be made against Trump associates, especially Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone.
what's that have to do with trump? you claim trump. that ain't trump. and again, it isn't illegal.

I never said anything about charging Trump. We're talking Trump campaign associates being investigated by the FBI.
we are? I thought we were talking collusion. did you bump your head?
 
Could you post where anybody from the FBI said they found nothing?
LOL, it doesn't work that way genius. If no one has evidence normal people don't see a cover up.

If there was no evidence as you claim, the FBI would have announced it, and closed the investigation. Just like they made that announcement about Anthony Weiners laptop.
They have said so during hearings. It isn't closed because it's a political with hunt. How many more years should they investigate the leaking of dnc corruption?
 

Forum List

Back
Top