martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
He is a primary source because he has direct knowledge of what happened because he was there. Being a source and an actor are not exclusive of each other.
Uhhhh yyyyyeah they are. You can't report on yourself.
Imagine asking, let's say, Doornail Rump where his father was born. Versus looking it up via independent source. There ya go.
Why not? where is that a rule? He described what happened to those sites, those sites asked rutgers for confirmation.
We are talking about the conversation had between him and the professor, he reported his view of what happened, College Reform and Briebart picked up on it, asked Rutgers for comment.
You know those Neptunians I told you about? The ones who landed in my yard and wanted to borrow your car?
They'll be over at 3, so be ready.
I don't have any evidence, corroboration or independent source, but not a problem. I said so, so that makes it a "thing".
There you go with argumentum ad absurdum again.
You didn't make the accusation publicly.
You didn't go to another party.
You havent asked the Neptunians to verify.
This board isn't "public"?
I've been to many a party.
And I did ask the Neptunians to verify. They haven't responded. Same as Rutgers.
The question is, why are you working so hard to derail this thread, when you won't address the issue in the one where it came from?
Lol, you are the one going off on "fuh fuh fuh, zomg whuts duh source, fuh fuh fuh" tangents.