AOC: Republicans Had To Amend The Constitution To Make Sure FDR Didn’t Get Re-Elected

[Pogo]

Somewhere Sarah Palin is chomping down on a grizzly burger and thinking, “And they called ME stupid."

yeah, and she's pretty smart...she can complete sentence and actually knows facts....

You mean “facts” like part of Paul Revere’s ride was to earn the British?

"Earn the British"?

Musta missed that one.

 

[Pogo]

AOCDS thread #7265205. This one actually thinks she's one of the Isely Brothers.

I started one long ago, even have the video for this one......She's fun to make fun of, she's a moron....and she's your leader....it's hilarious...….Trump's dick is smarter than her.

Yeah, she is an easy target because she is so fucking stupid. But a leader? You must be brain-dead to assert such nonsense. Now Bush was about as stupid and thanks to the right, he actually was a leader.

Name another Democrat making the cover of Time this year.

• Nancy Pelosi
• Beto O’Rourke
• Elizabeth Warren
• Bernie Sanders
• Kirsten Gillibrand
• Kamala Harris
• Corey Booker

The amazing thing about that list ---------------- none of those covers were made up by the subject to massage their own ego.

OK granted that sounds like a no-brainer. What kind of moron would do that.

 

[Lesh]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

 

[Faun]

Somewhere Sarah Palin is chomping down on a grizzly burger and thinking, “And they called ME stupid."

yeah, and she's pretty smart...she can complete sentence and actually knows facts....

You mean “facts” like part of Paul Revere’s ride was to earn the British?

"Earn the British"?

Musta missed that one.

LOL

Sorry about that...

*warn

 

[Pogo]

Somewhere Sarah Palin is chomping down on a grizzly burger and thinking, “And they called ME stupid."

yeah, and she's pretty smart...she can complete sentence and actually knows facts....

You mean “facts” like part of Paul Revere’s ride was to earn the British?

"Earn the British"?

Musta missed that one.

LOL

Sorry about that...

*warn

Figured that out after I posted, but the only person I can recall saying something like that was Sarah Palin.

OH. Wait, now I get it.
A bit obscure....

 

[Faun]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

It was passed as a reaction, but certainly not passed to prevent him from getting re-elected again. That’s just Palin stupid.

 

[Pogo]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

It was passed as a reaction, but certainly not passed to prevent him from getting re-elected again. That’s just Palin stupid.

Or to put it another way (again) -- "no more FDRs".

 

[bendog]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

AOC's whacky but amusingly she's right that it was to stop FDR keeping on keeping on.

But, Dewey in 1944? No Marshall Plan. Soviets in France?

 

[Pogo]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

Wilkie was a good man who would have done well. So was Wallace. Truman however was a disaster.

 

[irosie91]

She is VERY ORDINARY ---with a very big ego.
For that reason, she does well in politics. Not
Immoral-----she is AMORAL She should have
gone to law school

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Every time she speaks, she comes off sounding like a kid.

She makes the sophmoric sound like mature genuises.

 

[bendog]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

Wilkie was a good man who would have done well. So was Wallace. Truman however was a disaster.

ummm, there's too much pointing to Wallace being tied to the Soviets for me.

I'm not sure you can put Korea solely on Truman. The Dept of State was a clusterfuk in Asia. We should have done single payer back when politicans actually thought they had to balance budgets like real people.

 

[whitehall]

Maybe democrats would have run a dead guy for his 5th term. Who knows?

 

[bendog]

She is VERY ORDINARY ---with a very big ego.
For that reason, she does well in politics. Not
Immoral-----she is AMORAL She should have
gone to law school

Hey lawyers aren't all Sociopaths! LOL

Her ego is boundless though. Hopefully Crowley or someone will take her out in 20

 

[Lesh]

Every time she speaks, she comes off sounding like a kid.

She makes the sophmoric sound like mature genuises.

Try listening to the words not the tone

 

[Lesh]

ummm, there's too much pointing to Wallace being tied to the Soviets for me.

To some on this board that's a feature not a bug

 

[Faun]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

AOC's whacky but amusingly she's right that it was to stop FDR keeping on keeping on.

But, Dewey in 1944? No Marshall Plan. Soviets in France?

”she's right that it was to stop FDR keeping on keeping on.”

How was she right when FDR was dead?

 

[bendog]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

AOC's whacky but amusingly she's right that it was to stop FDR keeping on keeping on.

But, Dewey in 1944? No Marshall Plan. Soviets in France?

”she's right that it was to stop FDR keeping on keeping on.”

How was she right when FDR was dead?

come on. the gop and some dems were for "term limits" even when FDR was alive.

She's crazy, but as usual she's got just enough truth to be dangerous. LOL Pity her husband … but maybe she's a freak

 

[Pogo]

Every time she speaks, she comes off sounding like a kid.

She makes the sophmoric sound like mature genuises.

Try listening to the words not the tone

When somebody can only focus on the superficial -- a voice, a set of teeth, a pair of eyes, "ego" -- you know they're fixated on the lens of Butthurt. Or to use the proper psychology term, 'skeered".

Reminds one distinctly of all the O'bama obsession.

 

[Pogo]

Wait...wasn't the 22nd Amendment passed in 1947? That would have been in the last term of FDR's Presidency had he lived right?

Wasn't it passed as a reaction to him being elected four times?

Definitely, although probably 3.

And there's an irony. FDR was personally and professionaly fine with the 1940 gop candidate Wilke, who had been a dem. Wilke was opposed to the pacifist non-interventionists, but he opposed parts of the New Deal he considered anti-business. After the election Wilke served as an FDR advisor and was point man on aid to Britain.

Ironically Wilke and his 1940 running mate McNary died in 1944, the same year as FDR. Had Wilke been healthy, FDR might not have felt compelled to run again, knowing that he was dying. And FDR axed Henry Wallace off the ticket for Truman, and Wallace was likely a Soviet asset, or at best friend.

Wilkie was a good man who would have done well. So was Wallace. Truman however was a disaster.

ummm, there's too much pointing to Wallace being tied to the Soviets for me.

I'm not sure you can put Korea solely on Truman. The Dept of State was a clusterfuk in Asia. We should have done single payer back when politicans actually thought they had to balance budgets like real people.

Wasn't thinking specifically of Korea. I don't know of these supposed "ties to the Soviets". Declining to take part in a mass demonization isn't being "tied to" something. What after all would that make Truman on the other side of the coin? "Untied"?

Truman was an incurious little fart who was led around by the nose by bad influences like Jimmy Byrnes. His main objective seems to have been to prove himself a man to his father. Stop me if we've heard these traits somewhere else.