Arab Imperialism Unmasked: The Hypocrisy Behind the Anti-Israel Agenda

Do you think the term 'colonialism' applies to Arab conquests?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2

rylah

Gold Member
Jun 10, 2015
21,620
4,640
Arab Imperialism and Modern Anti-Israel Rhetoric: A Tale Of Bloody Hypocrisy

In discussions about the Arab-Israel conflict, anti-Israel rhetoric often frames Israel as a colonial oppressor. However, if we apply this same lens to the history of Arab conquests and the spread of Islam, a stark hypocrisy emerges.

Arab Imperialism

Historically, Arab conquests in the 7th century led to the imposition of Islam and Arab culture across vast regions, including the Levant and vast part of Africa. These conquests involved significant cultural, religious, and political changes imposed on indigenous cultures, fitting the definition of imperialism. This point is underscored by Yasser Arafat’s vision of a unified Arab state from Morocco in Africa to Aden in Arabia, highlighting the goal of exclusive Arab domination over the Middle East.




Double Standards

Anti-Israel campaigns accuse Israel of being a foreign minority, while ignoring the imperialist history of Arab expansion. The same standards applied to Israel would paint an even harsher picture of Arab conquests and their long-lasting impacts on the indigenous nations of the region.

  • Why is there a double standard in the way history and current conflicts are framed?
  • How do we leverage the hypocrisy in the anti-Israel narrative to engage potential allies, threatened by the same imperialist ideology ruining what has become most of the "Arab world"?
photoeditor_20190222_082203219.jpg
 
"What's in a Name? The Curious Case of 'P-alestine'"
Did you know that most Arabs can't even pronounce the name 'P - alestine'? Let's explore the linguistic and historical implications of this curious fact, and what it means for the authenticity of the Palestinian narrative.

The term 'Palestine' has a rich history, but interestingly, the letter 'P' does not exist in Arabic, leading to a unique pronunciation challenge. This raises questions about the authenticity of the Palestinian narrative and its historical roots.

Historically, the name 'Palestine' itself was a Roman invention, used to rename the region of Judea after the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE. The pronunciation challenge is not just a linguistic quirk but also a symbol of deeper issues of cultural and historical authenticity.

These stark contrasts highlight the moral and ethical complexities surrounding the Palestinian identity and the broader Arab-Israeli conflict.

Imagine a scenario where someone demands custody over a child whose name they cannot even pronounce. Now, imagine an ideology celebrating strapping someone's children in suicide vests for the promise of a land they cannot even pronounce.




(QUESTION)
How does the inability to pronounce the name reflect on the territorial claims
of those who advocate so fervently for it, sometimes to extreme measures?
 
Last edited:
Arab Imperialism and Modern Anti-Israel Rhetoric: A Tale Of Bloody Hypocrisy

In discussions about the Arab-Israel conflict, anti-Israel rhetoric often frames Israel as a colonial oppressor. However, if we apply this same lens to the history of Arab conquests and the spread of Islam, a stark hypocrisy emerges.

Arab Imperialism

Historically, Arab conquests in the 7th century led to the imposition of Islam and Arab culture across vast regions, including the Levant and vast part of Africa. These conquests involved significant cultural, religious, and political changes imposed on indigenous cultures, fitting the definition of imperialism. This point is underscored by Yasser Arafat’s vision of a unified Arab state from Morocco in Africa to Aden in Arabia, highlighting the goal of exclusive Arab domination over the Middle East.




Double Standards

Anti-Israel campaigns accuse Israel of being a foreign minority, while ignoring the imperialist history of Arab expansion. The same standards applied to Israel would paint an even harsher picture of Arab conquests and their long-lasting impacts on the indigenous nations of the region.

  • Why is there a double standard in the way history and current conflicts are framed?
  • How do we leverage the hypocrisy in the anti-Israel narrative to engage potential allies, threatened by the same imperialist ideology ruining what has become most of the "Arab world"?
photoeditor_20190222_082203219.jpg

I miss 'ole Yassar. He was a great leader for the Palestinians. Got them massacred over & over again by their own Arab brothers, embezzled their money & died from Aids. Sure looking forward to another one to replace him.
 
I miss 'ole Yassar. He was a great leader for the Palestinians. Got them massacred over & over again by their own Arab brothers, embezzled their money & died from Aids. Sure looking forward to another one to replace him.
And they LOVED him for that.
Don't forget his biggest contribution to humanity
hijacking airliners, and sending children in suicide vests.
 
Last edited:
The answer to the poll question is so ridiculously obvious, it doesn't need an answer.

And it's telling that no anti-Israel user has attempted to refute the poll question,
suggesting they recognize the reality of Arab imperialism too.

The next logical question would be -

does Islam fit the definition of Arab imperialism?
 
Exposing the Hidden History of Arab Colonialism
The Middle East was shaped by Arab colonialism,
but some minorities survive despite the odds

Have you ever considered the impact of Arab colonialism on the Middle East and North Africa?

This insightful article by George Monastiriakos reveals the often-ignored history of how Arab imperialism shaped the region. Despite centuries of dominance, some resilient minority groups have managed to survive against all odds.

Prepare to be outraged by the historical double standards that have obscured the true diversity of the MENA region. It’s time to acknowledge the enduring presence and contributions of these minority communities.

 
Last edited:
Arab Domination: The True Apartheid in the Middle East

Remember Arafat's vision of an Arab state stretching from Morocco to Aden? This isn’t about justice or peace; it’s about absolute hegemony. Exclusive Arab domination over the Middle East isn't just about land—it's about a system that oppresses millions.

The term 'apartheid' is often misused in the context of Israel. Let's explore the true history of Arab domination and its implications. Throughout history, Arab conquests have aimed for exclusive domination over the Middle East. This form of apartheid has had lasting impacts on the region's demographics and politics.

While the world turns a blind eye, real apartheid and modern slavery are thriving in the Arab world: in 2021, an estimated 1.7 million men, women, and children were living in modern slavery in the Arab States. Despite having the lowest number of people living in modern slavery across all regions, once population was considered, the Arab States have the highest prevalence of modern slavery.

modern-slavery.png

The hypocrisy is glaring. How can those who perpetuate real apartheid accuse Israel of what they practice daily?

Read the full article - Arab States: Walk Free



 

Forum List

Back
Top