Are cells conscious?

scruffy

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2022
20,147
16,629
2,288
This idea has been circulating for some time now.

Humans in their infinite arrogance have claimed repeatedly (in history) an exclusive on consciousness.

But science has proven repeatedly that this is not the case. (See for example, animal psychophysics, which is quantitative).

Now we know (as of last year) that DNA itself operates at the quantum level. There is both entanglement and tunneling in and along nucleotides.

 
This idea has been circulating for some time now.

Humans in their infinite arrogance have claimed repeatedly (in history) an exclusive on consciousness.

But science has proven repeatedly that this is not the case. (See for example, animal psychophysics, which is quantitative).

Now we know (as of last year) that DNA itself operates at the quantum level. There is both entanglement and tunneling in and along nucleotides.

I dont think you can label it as such if the things brain power is limited to just enough to perform its basic functions as an organism. Can we call snail "sentient" (maybe by the most clinical definition)? If not a snail, then definitely not a cell.

If it isnt self aware, then it doesnt matter, as far as im concerned.
 
I dont think you can label it as such if the things brain power is limited to just enough to perform its basic functions as an organism. Can we call snail "sentient" (maybe by the most clinical definition)? If not a snail, then definitely not a cell.

If it isnt self aware, then it doesnt matter, as far as im concerned.
A snail brain is actually very sophisticated, as studied by the famous neuroscientist Eric Kandel.

There are about 50,000 neurons in y'r average snail brain. Not a lot, but enough to establish a topology.

Snails exhibit true behavioral learning. They're not hard to train, either.
 
A snail brain is actually very sophisticated, as studied by the famous neuroscientist Eric Kandel.

There are about 50,000 neurons in y'r average snail brain. Not a lot, but enough to establish a topology.

Snails exhibit true behavioral learning. They're not hard to train, either.
Yeah, not really though. One study doesnt unravel the history of dumb snails slithering to their death across hot pavement. :laugh:
 
This idea has been circulating for some time now.

Humans in their infinite arrogance have claimed repeatedly (in history) an exclusive on consciousness.

But science has proven repeatedly that this is not the case. (See for example, animal psychophysics, which is quantitative).

Now we know (as of last year) that DNA itself operates at the quantum level. There is both entanglement and tunneling in and along nucleotides.

Animal psychophysics: The study of sensation in nonverbal organisms?

Okay
 
This idea has been circulating for some time now.

Humans in their infinite arrogance have claimed repeatedly (in history) an exclusive on consciousness.

But science has proven repeatedly that this is not the case. (See for example, animal psychophysics, which is quantitative).

Now we know (as of last year) that DNA itself operates at the quantum level. There is both entanglement and tunneling in and along nucleotides.

Is AI conscious in your assumptions?
 
Art. Looking up at the sky and wondering. Consciousness of self.

People are always misunderstanding things.

Question: Are humans the only self-aware species?

(caution, government study and website)
A basic level of self-awareness is confirmed to be present in non-human animals that conclusively pass the mirror test, but it is unknown if this can be extended to include their knowledge of internal thoughts and emotions.

I suppose you've never heard of mirror NEURONS, have you?

These are present in just about all vertebrates, and even some invertebrates. Certainly cats, which are only slightly social - and rats.

Mirror neurons in the rat anterior cingulate cortex mirror the EMOTIONS of other rats. Which goes well beyond simple physical recognition.

 
Is this theory for just cells in animals, or for cells in a living tree as well?
Great question.

Since we don't know the mechanisms yet, I can't answer.

What I know is, sentience requires a change of basis from allocentric to egocentric. It's much like a perspective transformation in computer graphics.

There are many ways to accomplish it, but for living things it amounts to this: in any cell there are sensory events and motor events, and the ego center is in between. A simple feedback loop might suffice with the right infrastructure.
 
This is an interesting topic, which science is just beginning to study.

This is one of the important papers, from 3 years ago:


But there is also a bottom up approach from this year:


Quantum mechanisms are older and simpler than the sophisticated stuff in a human brain. DNA is known to use both entanglement and tunneling. The requirement is that the memory persist during the amount of time through the feedback loop. For example - the MIT group studied fear in mice. In a single cell, if there is an "attack" resulting in a chemical signal inside the cell, and the cell responds with motility or any other form of defense, the memory must persist between the sensory event and the motor event. Looked at this way, the "event" may not actually be the trans-membrane signalling, it might be what happens in the nucleus afterwards. And similarly, the motor event may be the resulting change in nucleotide conformation, in which case the required memory duration may be very short.
 
A snail brain is actually very sophisticated, as studied by the famous neuroscientist Eric Kandel.

There are about 50,000 neurons in y'r average snail brain. Not a lot, but enough to establish a topology.

Snails exhibit true behavioral learning. They're not hard to train, either.
Try ants. They are incredible creatures. They obviously are aware of where they are and their surroundings.
 
This idea has been circulating for some time now.

Humans in their infinite arrogance have claimed repeatedly (in history) an exclusive on consciousness.

But science has proven repeatedly that this is not the case. (See for example, animal psychophysics, which is quantitative).

Now we know (as of last year) that DNA itself operates at the quantum level. There is both entanglement and tunneling in and along nucleotides.

Consciousness? No. Sentience? Yes. At least to some degree as they can sense their surroundings and respond to their surroundings. It's actually a characteristic of living things.
 
Consciousness? No. Sentience? Yes. At least to some degree as they can sense their surroundings and respond to their surroundings. It's actually a characteristic of living things.
Interesting statement.

What is the difference between consciousness and sentience?
 
Consciousness? No. Sentience? Yes. At least to some degree as they can sense their surroundings and respond to their surroundings. It's actually a characteristic of living things.
As I just mentioned in the other thread, it is also a characteristic of every entangled pair.

("Pair" being a deliberate euphemism for purposes of discussion, since we already know both "members" are part of the same wave function).

Here is today's exercise for Scruffy 101.

Describe the (relativistic) "reference frame" for the entangled pair.

Since there's only one wave function, there can be only one reference frame. Correct?
 

Forum List

Back
Top