Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taking care of the old and the sick is not "communism."
Spending government money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is what drives an economy.
It is not and has never been the responsibility for the Federal Government to do that. Infrastructure is limited to specific things as is research. The rest is State responsibility.
Read the fucking Constitution.
That's silly.
Do you drive on the interstate highway?
Liberals and democrats have an intense need to throw reality out the window and embrace socialisim and/or communisim because of the glittery promises. Take from the rich, give to the poor, everyone gets a nice house, a nice new car, lots of money, never has to work again. Everything is free because the nice powerful government made the rich give it up. Easy street forever more. The juvenile mind laps this up. They think themselves not at all greedy by wanting others to fulfill their wishes. It's FAIR. Why should someone else have more than they do. It's not FAIR.
They are wrong in many respects. Not the least of which is trusting the government to keep being fair when the government has all that power and wealth. The next is, once the weath is taken from the rich and redistributed, where is more wealth going to come from? This is what Margaret Thatcher meant when she said that the trouble with socialisim is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
It is not and has never been the responsibility for the Federal Government to do that. Infrastructure is limited to specific things as is research. The rest is State responsibility.
Read the fucking Constitution.
That's silly.
Do you drive on the interstate highway?
MORON ALERT. The Interstate is a legal part of the Federal Government. Education is not. Nor is taking care of all citizens with Federal funds. That is socialism and NOT a power granted to the Federal Government.
You prove your ignorance every time you post. Quit while you are behind.
Liberals and democrats have an intense need to throw reality out the window and embrace socialisim and/or communisim because of the glittery promises. Take from the rich, give to the poor, everyone gets a nice house, a nice new car, lots of money, never has to work again. Everything is free because the nice powerful government made the rich give it up. Easy street forever more. The juvenile mind laps this up. They think themselves not at all greedy by wanting others to fulfill their wishes. It's FAIR. Why should someone else have more than they do. It's not FAIR.
They are wrong in many respects. Not the least of which is trusting the government to keep being fair when the government has all that power and wealth. The next is, once the weath is taken from the rich and redistributed, where is more wealth going to come from? This is what Margaret Thatcher meant when she said that the trouble with socialisim is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
Reagan and the two Bushes created 93% of the National Debt by lower taxes for the rich. Go to ReaganBushDebt.org for the numbers.
The rich now pay taxes at a lower rate than the rest of us.
Spending money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is not "socialism."
Bailing out rich bankers is socialism.
Liberals and democrats have an intense need to throw reality out the window and embrace socialisim and/or communisim because of the glittery promises. Take from the rich, give to the poor, everyone gets a nice house, a nice new car, lots of money, never has to work again. Everything is free because the nice powerful government made the rich give it up. Easy street forever more. The juvenile mind laps this up. They think themselves not at all greedy by wanting others to fulfill their wishes. It's FAIR. Why should someone else have more than they do. It's not FAIR.
They are wrong in many respects. Not the least of which is trusting the government to keep being fair when the government has all that power and wealth. The next is, once the weath is taken from the rich and redistributed, where is more wealth going to come from? This is what Margaret Thatcher meant when she said that the trouble with socialisim is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
Reagan and the two Bushes created 93% of the National Debt by lower taxes for the rich. Go to ReaganBushDebt.org for the numbers.
The rich now pay taxes at a lower rate than the rest of us.
Spending money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is not "socialism."
Bailing out rich bankers is socialism.
How about bailing out Unions, democratic faithful and voter groups that commit federal crimes with US tax payer money?
How much death has to be caused by these systems before people understand they dont work?
Funny, I thought those deaths were because those countries were undergoing years of war and civil war before the commies took over.
How many people died in our own civil war, and in the violence that followed it?
Communism and Capitalism have one thing in common. They both sound great on paper. and they both tend to really get screwed up when human beings are involved. We tend to find the way to screw up just about anything.
The present Administration obviously wants to take us in the direction of European socialism.
The present Administration obviously wants to take us in the direction of European socialism.
How many deaths have been caused by European socialism?
You mean besides Hitler in Germany and Stalin in Eastern Europe?
How much death has to be caused by these systems before people understand they dont work?
Taking care of the old and the sick is not "communism."
Spending government money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is what drives an economy.
A generation of kids have been taught by union teachers that communists aren't as bad as republicans.
A generation of kids have been taught by union teachers that communists aren't as bad as republicans.
Don't know about the "union teachers," but there's one sense in which Republicans are definitely worse than Communists. Communists don't control the House of Representatives.
Liberals and democrats have an intense need to throw reality out the window and embrace socialisim and/or communisim because of the glittery promises. Take from the rich, give to the poor, everyone gets a nice house, a nice new car, lots of money, never has to work again. Everything is free because the nice powerful government made the rich give it up. Easy street forever more. The juvenile mind laps this up. They think themselves not at all greedy by wanting others to fulfill their wishes. It's FAIR. Why should someone else have more than they do. It's not FAIR.
They are wrong in many respects. Not the least of which is trusting the government to keep being fair when the government has all that power and wealth. The next is, once the weath is taken from the rich and redistributed, where is more wealth going to come from? This is what Margaret Thatcher meant when she said that the trouble with socialisim is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
Reagan and the two Bushes created 93% of the National Debt by lower taxes for the rich. Go to ReaganBushDebt.org for the numbers.
The rich now pay taxes at a lower rate than the rest of us.
Spending money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is not "socialism."
Bailing out rich bankers is socialism.
How about bailing out Unions, democratic faithful and voter groups that commit federal crimes with US tax payer money?
It's really not that hard to figure out. We don't have very many Communists in this country, certainly none in government. We do have Republicans. Republicans are a clear and present danger. Communists are not.
How much death has to be caused by these systems before people understand they dont work?
Taking care of the old and the sick is not "communism."
Spending government money on education, healthcare, research, and infrastructure is what drives an economy.
It's really not that hard to figure out. We don't have very many Communists in this country, certainly none in government. We do have Republicans. Republicans are a clear and present danger. Communists are not.
