Are people who vote differently from you evil?

[2aguy]

Democrats are evil. They don't have to vote to be evil. They are evil even if they don't vote.

Democrat leadership is evil……members of the blm, antifa democrat party brown shirts are evil…..the majority of the democrqt votimg base are clueless or fools.

 

[2aguy]

A two party system is fine as long as neither of them are democrats.

A two party system of conservatives and libertarians would be good…..one party would want limited government, he other party would want even lessgovernmemt……a win win for freedom.

 

[Man of Ethics]

I see the viciousness of Democratic/Progressive mobs destroying careers of anyone disagreeing with them. I definitely support Republicans overall.

Some people would benefit from Republican policies -- they vote Republican.
Some people would benefit from Democratic policies -- they vote Democrat.

People are not identical.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

When you side with criminals over our police, you are evil.
When you side with weirdos indoctrinating our children in school without parental knowledge, you are evil.
When you side with disarming law abiding citizens, you are evil.
When you side with a party that strives to take God out of society, you are evil.
When you make hundreds of millions suffer so you can put forth your political agenda like "green" you are evil.

 

[JWBooth]

I understand that voting Democrat is the best option for some people.

leeches mostly

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Their abortion stance alone confirms that Democrat politicians are objectively evil, and the voters who keep supporting those inhuman bastards are at the very least amoral, not good.

 

[Mac1958]

NO.

Nor do I hate them, nor are they my enemy, nor do I think they hate America, nor do I wish them ill.

Either end.

 

[initforme]

Perhaps it's time for Uber wealthy candidates to take a back seat to the average worker who lives paycheck to paycheck. We may need many of those leading the nation.

 

[struth]

Perhaps it's time for Uber wealthy candidates to take a back seat to the average worker who lives paycheck to paycheck. We may need many of those leading the nation.

if you can’t figure out how not to live paycheck to paycheck, you can’t lead a nation.

 

[DBA]

Only anti-Americans.

And those living off the government.

 

[Resnic]

No.

If someone votes different than me that's fine. They are allowed to have their opinions and I can have mine.

But some of the people they vote for are evil.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I vote Republican. Those who vote Democrat need a better understanding of economics.

 

[2aguy]

I vote Republican. Those who vote Democrat need a better understanding of economics.

And just about everything else.

 

[Curried Goats]

I see the viciousness of Democratic/Progressive mobs destroying careers of anyone disagreeing with them. I definitely support Republicans overall.

Some people would benefit from Republican policies -- they vote Republican.
Some people would benefit from Democratic policies -- they vote Democrat.

People are not identical.

Isn't that how capitalism is supposed to work? People voting with their wallets?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Mostly the poll.

Why do so many of you people assume everyone in the country votes either Dem or Repub?

Would you kill you to add a 3rd choice to your poll?

 

[Papageorgio]

Mostly the poll.

I vote for who I believe would be best for the position, that doesn’t mean it is one of the two parties. Limiting yourself two the two parties isn’t smart.

 

[22lcidw]

When it comes to the border for some reason Progs just think there is nothing wrong and it is simple. They have put many in jail from Januray 6. People outside the capitol building in jail. They know that. they make things up. This is like retardation. Of the voters. The people coming into America are voting the same as they voted in their own countries. Repeating the same mistakes as Prog Americans moving into Red areas are doing.

 

[Blaster]

Mostly the poll.

They aren't evil, just retarded.

 

[healthmyths]

Yet not one of those of you that favor GOP seem to recognize that the real issue is information.
Information that is NOT accurate but biasedly presented by the MSM. I've put up the proof i.e. MSM donated 96% to Hillary, she lost, the MSM spent 4 years with the most negative news about Trump, then they donated 90% to Biden. And Biden had the least negative news of the last 5 presidents.
The study found that about 19% of the coverage of Biden's first 60 days days has been negative over the first 60 days of his administration, which ranked best among presidents of the last three decades.
1) lowest negative news Biden 19%
2) Former Presidents Bill Clinton (28%), negative
3) George W. Bush (28%), negative
4) Barack Obama (20%), negative
5) Donald Trump (62%) negative. (again REMEMBER the BIASED MSM Donated 96% of their money to Hillary..she LOST!

Biden received less negative media coverage than any president on record while Trump received most: study

A new study shows President Joe Biden has received less negative coverage from U.S. media than any president in the last 30 years.

gazette.com

Now I'm going to attach again the PROOF of the biased MSM donations to Democrats and thus the tremendous amount of BIASED news.
For example: ABC,CBS,NBC donated $400 million in free advertising by providing in 3 months over 32.7 hours of coverage,
(by TV standards an eternity of news time). Everything You Need to Know About TV Advertising Costs $104,700/30 sec.
What they found was, over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history —
92% negative, vs. just 8% positive.from July 29 through October 20

Broadcast networks deliver 92% negative coverage for Trump, 66% positive for Biden: Study

The country’s major broadcast news media outlets have never been more negatively biased against a sitting president than Donald Trump, a conservative media watchdog has concluded in its latest study, which found President Trump receives negatively-slanted coverage 92% of the time in network news...

www.washingtontimes.com

Yet not one GOP supporter, politician, etc., seem to want to do as Trump, Kari Lake, and NON-RINOs have pointed out this extreme BIASED MSM. NOW none of us i.e. the non-RINOs favor MSM suppression. NOT one of us!
What we want though is more of you HONEST voters to comprehend the major difference.
Again.. Remember the BIASED MSM donated 96% to Hillary, spent 4 years with majority of news NEGATIVE about Trump (and part of that was Trump was acknowledging the "fake news"!) and then donated 90% to Biden!
Please those of you that WANT informed and unbiased news reporting simply remember this.

By 1944, a shortage of newspaper and ink forced the Nazi government to limit all newspapers first to eight, then four, and finally, two pages. Of the 4,700 newspapers published in Germany when the Nazis took power in 1933,
no more that 1,100 remained.
Approximately half were still in the hands of private or institutional owners, but these newspapers operated in strict compliance with government press laws and published material only in accordance with directives issued by the Ministry of Propaganda. While the circulation of these newspapers was approximately 4.4 million, the circulation of the 325 newspapers and their multiple regional editions owned by the Nazi Party was 21 million.

The Press in the Third Reich

After rising to power, the Nazis eliminated freedom of the press in Germany. Learn more about how they established control over the press and manipulated it.

encyclopedia.ushmm.org

 

[healthmyths]

When it comes to the border for some reason Progs just think there is nothing wrong and it is simple. They have put many in jail from Januray 6. People outside the capitol building in jail. They know that. they make things up. This is like retardation. Of the voters. The people coming into America are voting the same as they voted in their own countries. Repeating the same mistakes as Prog Americans moving into Red areas are doing.

I Totally agree regarding 1/6/2021!

But the biased MSM has continued to grossly over emphasize this while totally ignoring this destructive, more lives lost and definitely extreme violence!
Over $2 billion in damages, 15 deaths... in the summer of 2020 all again against the police and favored by Democrats!

George Floyd Riots Caused Record-Setting $2 Billion in Damage, New Report Says. Here’s Why the True Cost Is Even Higher​

The arson, vandalism and looting... will result in at least $1 billion to $2 billion of paid insurance claims,” Axios reports. “[This will] eclips[e] the record set in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the police officers who brutalized Rodney King.”
As I have previously explained, insurance is no panacea for the societal ills imposed by rioting. Indeed, 75 percent of US businesses are under-insured and about 40 percent of small businesses have no insurance at all. Their untold millions in losses don’t show up in the $2 billion figure.
For example, what about the more than 15 people who died during the unrest? Their lives and their families’ pain don’t get counted in any insurance company’s budgetary analysis.

George Floyd Riots Caused Record-Setting $2 Billion in Damage, New Report Says. Here’s Why the True Cost Is Even Higher

According to new reporting, the post-George-Floyd riots caused up to $2 billion in insured property damage. This sets a new record compared to past riots in American history—but the figure actually underestimates the true costs. Here’s why.

fee.org

BUT where was most of the coverage?
January 6,2021 Or the George Floyd riots that cost more than $2 billion and 15 lives!