ATF allows more guns to be sold to drug dealers...in Florida...

[Old Rocks]

what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?......and a militia is not a police force....

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

 

[2aguy]

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...

Because we are a free society. So that means that the mentally unstable, that have not committed a crime, have access to all kinds of rather lethal equipment. Tim McVeigh. Sandy Hook. Making it far easier for someone with a record of mental instability to buy a war weapon increases the wealth of the gun manufacturer, and increases the security problems of our nation. In 300 million citizens, there are going to be a certain number that are dangerous to the rest of us. Fortunately, most are mentally incapable or, or too lazy to, learn how to be really lethal.

Except you are wrong....on everything you say about guns in this country...

We went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400 million guns in private hands and over 15.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2017...guess what happened...

-- gun murder down 49%
--gun crime down 75%
--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

mcveigh used explosives....the Sandy Hook shooter stole his weapons....

mass shootings happen in gun free zones that you guys wanted...you took guns away from the very people who keep mass shooters away.....it is almost like you want mass shooters to target unarmed people....

 

[2aguy]

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

 

[Old Rocks]

Why do we have Any security problem in our free States, gun lovers?

Because people educated in government schools controlled by the education wing of the democrat party keep voting democrats into local offices...

Obviously no problem with you having ever been educated. It is the GOP and the 'Conservatives' that are defunding our schools, the very schools that we need to educate a new class of technicians. There are 6 million high paying jobs going begging in this nation for lack of trained people. Yet you assholes just continue to rail against education of any sort, and work as hard as you can to reduce this nation to third world status in research and development.

rocks money to schools may not be the major problem,look at California,they pumped billions into their system over the last 40 years and went from top 5 to bottom 10...what happened there?....

Look, I have been going to a university off and on, as work schedule would allow, for nearly five years. I know what school costs. And I see young people that work two part time jobs, live off Top Ramen, attending classes tired to the point of barely being able to keep their eyes open. Not everyone has a rich family, and not everyone is willing to go that deeply into debt, knowing that another crash like 2008 will put them out of school again. So don't tell me that money is not an issue.

And then they graduate and get jobs.....everyone struggles...I paid my own way through college....working full time to do it....it can be done......no one should pay for someone else to get a degree in poetry....

Yes, and your incredible stupidity demonstrates that you didn't learn much. China, South Korea, Japan all have programs where students that work at learning their discipline get a free ride. And they are graduating more engineers than we are, and it shows. More patents issued in China now than in the US.

 

[Fenton Lum]

We arm the Wahabist Saudi's son, profit is profit.

Dumb fuck, if this is happening now, it is the fault of the fat senile old orange clown and his stupid traitorous minions. People like you.

No.....the morons who did Fast and Furious were never replaced..they are obama and eric holder minions....

Really? You mean that your fat senile old orange clown is too busy golfing to drain the swamp? LOL Maybe he should cease tweeting and actually do some work.

Drain? Or continue the usual stocking of the swamp?

Trump’s Watered-Down Ethics Rules Let a Lobbyist Help Run an Agency He Lobbied


https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/...s-now-theyre-on-his-transition-team.html?_r=0


Is Donald Trump Draining the Swamp?


Donors and lobbyists already shaping Trump’s ‘drain the swamp’ administration


Trump Names Mortgage Industry Lobbyist to HUD Transition Team


Donald Trump Puts Coal Lobbyist in Charge of Prosecuting Environmental Crimes


Only Lobbyists Can Help Trump ‘Drain the Swamp’

 

[Old Rocks]

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.

 

[Fenton Lum]

We arm the Wahabist Saudi's son, profit is profit.

Dumb fuck, if this is happening now, it is the fault of the fat senile old orange clown and his stupid traitorous minions. People like you.

No.....the morons who did Fast and Furious were never replaced..they are obama and eric holder minions....

The "your guys are more corrupt than my guys" is really wearing thin and devoid of any partisanshithead coherence on anyone's side at this point son. It's the system, the whole damn thing.

 

[Fenton Lum]

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

We "license" arming the very folks who arm terrorists. Amazing isn't it.

 

[2aguy]

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.

No moron....any gun at close range is lethal.....the reason they don't use the Thompson is it is long, weighs a ton and doesn't have the cool factor you morons have created in the AR-15......and you can still get the Thompson if you want it.......moron....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Yeah.....and?

Why do we have Any security problem in our free States, gun lovers?

Because people educated in government schools controlled by the education wing of the democrat party keep voting democrats into local offices...

Obviously no problem with you having ever been educated. It is the GOP and the 'Conservatives' that are defunding our schools, the very schools that we need to educate a new class of technicians. There are 6 million high paying jobs going begging in this nation for lack of trained people. Yet you assholes just continue to rail against education of any sort, and work as hard as you can to reduce this nation to third world status in research and development.

rocks money to schools may not be the major problem,look at California,they pumped billions into their system over the last 40 years and went from top 5 to bottom 10...what happened there?....

Look, I have been going to a university off and on, as work schedule would allow, for nearly five years. I know what school costs. And I see young people that work two part time jobs, live off Top Ramen, attending classes tired to the point of barely being able to keep their eyes open. Not everyone has a rich family, and not everyone is willing to go that deeply into debt, knowing that another crash like 2008 will put them out of school again. So don't tell me that money is not an issue.

you are talking about the universities,im talking about cals public school system....big difference.....and what i said about it stands... care to comment on that?....

 

[Old Rocks]

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.

No moron....any gun at close range is lethal.....the reason they don't use the Thompson is it is long, weighs a ton and doesn't have the cool factor you morons have created in the AR-15......and you can still get the Thompson if you want it.......moron....

Of course you can. I have a friend that has a fully automatic .45 Thompson. He did the paper work, and he enjoys shooting it. I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with those that defend selling guns to mentally ill people.

 

[Old Rocks]

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.

No moron....any gun at close range is lethal.....the reason they don't use the Thompson is it is long, weighs a ton and doesn't have the cool factor you morons have created in the AR-15......and you can still get the Thompson if you want it.......moron....

The AR-15, cool? It is a fucking ugly gun, and clumsy at that. Much prefer the Garand.

 

[danielpalos]

I disagree. We need better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia. We have a Second Amendment.

what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?......and a militia is not a police force....

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

Posse comitatus is the common-law or statute law authority of a county sheriff, or other law officer, to conscript any able-bodied man to assist him in keeping the peace or to pursue and arrest a felon, similar to the concept of the "hue and cry." Originally found in English common law,[2] it is generally obsolete; however, it survives in the United States, where it is the law enforcement equivalent of summoning the militia for military purposes.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_comitatus

 

[danielpalos]

I disagree. We need better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia. We have a Second Amendment.

what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?......and a militia is not a police force....

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

this has got nothing to do with what you were asking.....like i said you have no clue as to what you are talking about.....

Just clueless and Causeless and projecting, right winger?

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

 

[danielpalos]

what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?......and a militia is not a police force....

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...

Pay attention, dear.

In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....

On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.

No.......it can't.......

Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......

Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...

So please....explain how licensing works.....

How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.

No moron....any gun at close range is lethal.....the reason they don't use the Thompson is it is long, weighs a ton and doesn't have the cool factor you morons have created in the AR-15......and you can still get the Thompson if you want it.......moron....

Of course you can. I have a friend that has a fully automatic .45 Thompson. He did the paper work, and he enjoys shooting it. I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with those that defend selling guns to mentally ill people.

Here is a case for a gun registry if gun lovers don't want to be well regulated and potentially exempt:

An interesting and widely unknown fact, since the NFA went into effect in 1934, there has only been ONE, yes, ONE single felony committed in the whole United States since 1934 that involved a legally registered NFA firearm. And it was committed ironically by a crooked police officer who went to a drug house and shot someone on the premises. He used his legally acquired UZI sub machinegun to commit the crime. You hear all the time of machineguns and sawed off shotguns in the news but these have all been by individuals possessing an illegal, non registered weapon. There are millions of records of legally owned entries on the NFA registry too, so it’s not like we’re talking just a few hundred or thousand potential individuals.--http://www.oldglorygunsandammo.com/nfa-class-iii-weapons/

 

[August West]

Crime pays...especially if you are a government agency dependent on crime, as the ATF is.

Government...it always SUCKS.

In a sane nation, Obama gets impeached and removed for F&F. In an insane nation, nothing happens to Obama and most Americans have no clue what he did.

Nothing happened to mass murderer Bush. What`s your point?

 

[gipper]

Crime pays...especially if you are a government agency dependent on crime, as the ATF is.

Government...it always SUCKS.

In a sane nation, Obama gets impeached and removed for F&F. In an insane nation, nothing happens to Obama and most Americans have no clue what he did.

Nothing happened to mass murderer Bush. What`s your point?

I know you may think anyone who criticisms your Messiah, must admire W. This is terribly illogical since both men ruled liked blood brothers.

Both men should have been impeached, removed, and prosecuted for their crimes.

 

[Harry Dresden]

what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?......and a militia is not a police force....

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

this has got nothing to do with what you were asking.....like i said you have no clue as to what you are talking about.....

Just clueless and Causeless and projecting, right winger?

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

right winger?....thats another poster....like i said you have no idea what you are doing here...

 

[Harry Dresden]

We have a Second Amendment. Are you claiming right wing governors and commanders in chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State, not a free City, are useless?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...

Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Than means:

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.

that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...

Pay attention, dear.

In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.

gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....