pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 72,060
- 28,020
- 2,210
- Thread starter
- #161
Because it wasn't democrats who wrote that legislation. They were in the minority at the time. The republicans controlled both chambers of the congress and the White House. That bill was written, passed and signed into law in 2018 by republicans.
Democrats didn't start the mess. Clinton left a balanced budget with a surplus. The bush boy destroyed it with his first budget. He cut taxes too much and removed too many very necessary regulations.
Clinton did sign a republican bill that removed proper regulation on banks and lending institutions. The repeal of Glass/Stegal never should have happened. Clinton was wrong to sign that legislation though signing it wouldn't have stopped it. It had a veto proof majority. The legislation was written by republicans, they controlled both chambers of the congress at the time.
It wasn't only the democrats who caused the mess of the bush boy years. In fact, most of the responsibility for that mess falls directly on the shoulders of the republicans. Democrats didn't deregulate and cut taxes in the bush boy years. The bush boy and his republican congress did it.
Democrats didn't start the mess.
Clinton didn't tell HUD to mandate Fannie and Freddie make half their mortgage buys subprime mortgages?
Quid Pro Quo. The government loosened regulations and the banks made the loans.
The repeal of Glass/Stegal never should have happened.Glass-Steagall didn't prevent banks from writing, or buying, crappy mortgages.
It would have kept the banks from putting money that did not belong to them at risk,
The government loosened regulations and the banks made the loans.
I agree, pushing loans to less creditworthy borrowers wasn't something the government should have done.
It would have kept the banks from putting money that did not belong to them at risk,
Glass-Steagall would have prevented banks from writing mortgages? Are you sure?
If you refuse to honestly discuss what I say, we are done.
Every loan a bank makes is "putting money that did not belong to them at risk"
Do you honestly not understand how banks operate?
Loaning wasn't the issue. "Investing it was". I believe you know this but you feel this intense need to deflect.