Biden LIES about Jobs

[jknowgood]

Retard, again... it was based on the CIA's assessment at the time...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.​

​

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on intelligence​

Is that why Hillary sent Chelsea an email calling it a terrorist attack, while telling us is was about a movie.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The narrative went on for weeks, and your fixation on lying about it.

Yes, it did.
By FOX and other RWNJ's with the attention span of a gnat.

 

[Faun]

The narrative went on for weeks, and your fixation on lying about it.

Yes, because it took two weeks until the CIA obtained video showing them the protest video wasn't the catalyst for the attack.

Do you not understand this...?

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.​

​

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on intelligence​

 

[jknowgood]

Yes, it did.
By FOX and other RWNJ's with the attention span of a gnat.

Funny it was also on all the Sunday shows.

 

[Faun]

Is that why Hillary sent Chelsea an email calling it a terrorist attack, while telling us is was about a movie.

Yes, it is. What part of, There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks, don't you understand??

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Is that why Hillary sent Chelsea an email calling it a terrorist attack, while telling us is was about a movie.

WTF?
WTF does it matter what caused it retard?

NO ONE denied it was a terror attack, moron.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Funny it was also on all the Sunday shows.

Yeah, they were laughing at RWNJ's.

 

[jknowgood]

Yes, because it took two weeks until the CIA obtained video showing them the protest video wasn't the catalyst for the attack.

Do you not understand this...?

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.​

​

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on intelligence​

I know that Obama was going around bragging about how he decimated Al-Qaeda. Then a terrorist attack by them. So he had to lie about it right before the election.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes, it is. What part of, There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks, don't you understand??

EVERYTHING but movie, movie, movie, movie, movie, movie, movie.

 

[jknowgood]

WTF?
WTF does it matter what caused it retard?

NO ONE denied it was a terror attack, moron.

They tried the narrative about a spontaneous protest about a movie. Dumbass.

 

[jknowgood]

EVERYTHING but movie, movie, movie, movie, movie, movie, movie.

That was the narrative for weeks. My gosh you loons are the most uninformed people on the planet.

 

[jknowgood]

Yes, it is. What part of, There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks, don't you understand??

I knew it was a terrorist attack and not a protest in the beginning. I guess I was more informed, the the president of the United States.

 

[Faun]

I knew it was a terrorist attack and not a protest in the beginning. I guess I was more informed, the the president of the United States.

LOL

I have no doubt you think so.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

They tried the narrative about a spontaneous protest about a movie. Dumbass.

Sure they did moron.
That's what the RWNJ's claimed for months, you're confusing those idiots with people that have sense.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

That was the narrative for weeks. My gosh you loons are the most uninformed people on the planet.

No, idiot that was the narrative on FOX.
You think those retards keep you "informed"?

Of course, you do.
Those idiots got traction for years with 57 states, you goobers ate it up.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I knew it was a terrorist attack and not a protest in the beginning. I guess I was more informed, the the president of the United States.

WOW!!!!
WTF was your first clue, dead bodies, fire, explosions?
You must be a genius, like your daddy.

 

[DBA]

Sure they did moron.
That's what the RWNJ's claimed for months, you're confusing those idiots with people that have sense.

Nobody that voted for Biden has any sense. Case closed.

 

[jknowgood]

No, idiot that was the narrative on FOX.
You think those retards keep you "informed"?

Of course, you do.
Those idiots got traction for years with 57 states, you goobers ate it up.

It was the narrative on meet the press for several weeks.

No, idiot that was the narrative on FOX.
You think those retards keep you "informed"?

Of course, you do.
Those idiots got traction for years with 57 states, you goobers ate it up.

Oh my, that's funny coming from someone that shit himself over everything Trump said. Lol

 

[Faun]

It was the narrative on meet the press for several weeks.

Oh my, that's funny coming from someone that shit himself over everything Trump said. Lol

Yes, it was on Meet the Press for weeks. Again... here's why...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.​

​

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on intelligence​

 

[jknowgood]

Yes, it was on Meet the Press for weeks. Again... here's why...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.​

​

U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on intelligence​

Lol, everyone else knew it was a terrorist attack but the people in charge. Is that what you're saying?