Biden on Audio Admitting Trump 'Beat the Hell Out of Us Across the Country"! lol

This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.

So you want us to believe that Biden can outperform Clinton by large margins in a place like Texas but when he does it in any other state, it’s fraud?

Pretty shaky logic.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.

So you want us to believe that Biden can outperform Clinton by large margins in a place like Texas but when he does it in any other state, it’s fraud?

Pretty shaky logic.

Texas demographics have changed dramatically. You’re being phony.
 
Plugs has been told by his Visiting Angel he lost huge and the stuttering fuck is just too far gone to keep it to himself. That's hilarious. :abgg2q.jpg:

Now it's pretty obvious barry "boy" soetoro didn't win jack shit either. Fucking awesome..... hmm?
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.

So you want us to believe that Biden can outperform Clinton by large margins in a place like Texas but when he does it in any other state, it’s fraud?

Pretty shaky logic.

Texas demographics have changed dramatically. You’re being phony.

Not that dramatically. Not in the last 4 years. You’re making rationalizations.
 
Don't worry, Trump cult losers. Crying hysterically about idiot conspiracy theories doesn't make you look like even bigger losers. Really it doesn't, so you just all keep on doing it.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.

So you want us to believe that Biden can outperform Clinton by large margins in a place like Texas but when he does it in any other state, it’s fraud?

Pretty shaky logic.

Texas demographics have changed dramatically. You’re being phony.

Not that dramatically. Not in the last 4 years. You’re making rationalizations.

Trump won Texas in spite of the exodus of dems to that state.
That doesn’t change the obvious corruption of this election.
Consider the numbers and the fact that kommie the Ho was rejected by 96% of democrats. Makes it all more obvious.
 
This kind of reinforces the notion that Bidens previous comment a few months ago abvout having the largest voter fraud program in history was actually just a Freudian slip.


It doesn’t. It means that Trump is just that disliked.

Really?
74 million real votes of dislike?

No, more like 81 million votes of dislike, far more than the "votes of like" if you will.

If it weren't for Trump, Republicans probably would have had a really good year.

Those extra Biden votes are phony.
Trump increased his total by 17%. That’s the opposite of repudiation. No incumbent since cleveland in 1888 gained more votes and still lost. And Cleveland was the democrat with the urban vote who also won the popular vote that year. The Trump dynamic is opposite of that. He increased by 17% without the urban/big city vote. That’s what makes this election so obviously corrupt.
I know this is difficult for you because it involves math and was completely ignored by Pravda, so you won’t even know about it.

There’s some serious problems with this analysis.

How did Biden gain so many votes in a place like Texas where no one is claiming has been subject to phony votes?

Austin, Dallas and all places that white democrats are escaping to.
Most of the fake votes were in swing states.

So you want us to believe that Biden can outperform Clinton by large margins in a place like Texas but when he does it in any other state, it’s fraud?

Pretty shaky logic.

Texas demographics have changed dramatically. You’re being phony.

Not that dramatically. Not in the last 4 years. You’re making rationalizations.

Trump won Texas in spite of the exodus of dems to that state.
That doesn’t change the obvious corruption of this election.
Consider the numbers and the fact that kommie the Ho was rejected by 96% of democrats. Makes it all more obvious.

Texas grew by about 5% since 2016. Biden’s votes in Texas increased by nearly 40% over Clinton.

You’re rationalization is staggeringly off.
 

Forum List

Back
Top