Big win for Civil Rights...and from left wing 9th Circuit Court of Appeals no less....

[daws101]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

God did.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

Rights aren't determined by amendment alone.

Case in point, which amendment specifies the right to sell firearms?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

The 14th.

 

[Asclepias]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. —Ninth Amendment

 

[turzovka]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

You mean like holding them to basic medical cleanliness and safety requirements? You know many are not subject to the same licensing and inspections as almost all clinics and hospitals? And you know why. Because secularists and liberals are afraid they will surely fail and be shut down. But you care more about your restaurant being inspected than any old abortion mill.

No, that is not what is happening. You lie.

Minnesota Senate Rejects Licensing and Inspection Abortion Clinics

Illinois abortion clinics face demand for more inspections

http://nypost.com/2014/04/07/health-department-fails-to-regularly-inspect-abortion-clinics/

Despite Licensing, Carhart’s Late-term Abortion Clinic Not Inspected Prior to Patient Death

https://www.sba-list.org/wp-content...-Highlighting-the-Most-Egregious-Offenses.pdf

 

[Uncensored2008]

Pity most conservatives are incapable of being consistent with their advocacy of civil rights, such as the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay Americans, and the right of those transgender to freedom of expression.

Pity you are incapable of being honest.

Privacy rights? You mean the right not to disclose to the federal government where a woman works, how much she is paid, what charities she gives to, if she owns a home, if she has children, if she attends church, etc. on a 1040 form? You know, secure from unwarranted search.

Oh, but that isn't "privacy" in the humpty dumpty world of Bolsheviks. No, "privacy" is going to a public facility and having a baby cut out - in fact it is the ONLY meaning of "privacy" you hold. But then you are the Humpty Dumpty fools, and demand that words mean exactly what you want them to mean, nothing more or less.

Now run along and find a corner to hide in and piss yourself in fear. You've been taken to the woodshed yet again, C_Coward.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The 9th Circuit, at one time one of the most overturned courts in the country, and may still be.....ruled that the 2nd Amendment is not a second class right....and that democrats can't use their usual tactics of fake regulations to prohibit it's practice by American citizens...

Ninth Circuit Court rules that Second Amendment is “not a second class right” - Hot Air

The Ninth Circuit Court was asked to rule on a “zoning ordinance” in Alameda County which would have placed severe restrictions on the opening of any new gun shop if it was within 500 feet of a wide variety of other types of structures. As Kerry Picket reports at The Daily Caller, the wording of the majority opinion drew a line in the sand regarding the sanctity of the Second Amendment. (Emphasis added)

----

Writing for the majority, Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain said that the “right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees…”


And this is why we do not trust anti gun nut jobs when they say they don't want to ban guns........they are lying.....

The tactic being employed by anti-Second Amendment forces in Alameda County was in keeping with many others we’ve seen around the country, but the gun grabbers are clearly getting more clever in their efforts to undermine gun rights.

This scheme was cloaked in the mundane sounding guise of a typical zoning ordinance, but they had done their homework to create a lethally poisonous pill in the details.

Restricting the licensing of a gun shop in close proximity to a school is nothing new, but this one layered on many more boundaries.

Under the new rule, gun merchants would be forbidden from opening their doors within 500 feet of anyresidentially-zoned district (i.e. anyplace with a house or an apartment building), a school, pre-school, day care center or anyplace where alcohol was sold.

That last one included not just bars, but any convenience store or other outlet where you could purchase a six-pack of beer.

So no, we don't trust you or any of your new attempts to create new gun control laws.......

Is there a difference between that and zoning restrictions on adult bookstores/theatres and the like?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

God did.

I see you have over-indulged on paint chips. vodka, and Easy-Off yet again.

You are rarely coherent, but you've hit a new low today.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rights aren't determined by amendment alone.

That's true, they are merely enumerated.

Case in point, which amendment specifies the right to sell firearms?

The second.

You're not very good at this.

 

[Asclepias]

Rights aren't determined by amendment alone.

That's true, they are merely enumerated.

Case in point, which amendment specifies the right to sell firearms?

The second.

You're not very good at this.

Nowhere in the second amendment does it state you have the right to sell firearms dummy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

This is as ignorant as it is wrong.

The right to privacy is guaranteed by the Fifth and 14th Amendments.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The 14th.

Really?

Well let's check.

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Hmm, nothing here about abortion, This is the clause which ensures that actual rights are protected in the states and that due process is followed.

Section 2.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Nope, nothing here either, this is the apportionment clause forbidding the "3/5ths" idiocy.

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Nothing here either. The exclusion clause forbids former confederates from holding office.

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Insurrection clause, invalidating the debts that the confederacy had with the Railroads and a few other entities. Certainly nothing about abortion.

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Gee, I guess you were just lying.

Well, you're a democrat, that's what you do.

 

[daws101]

[

God did.

I see you have over-indulged on paint chips. vodka, and Easy-Off yet again.

You are rarely coherent, but you've hit a new low today.

oh no not the ( add substance here) ploy again.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is as ignorant as it is wrong.

The right to privacy is guaranteed by the Fifth and 14th Amendments.

Abortion is related to "privacy" as frog is related to "quantum attraction."

You might be an idiot, but at least you're partisan and lack integrity.

 

[Uncensored2008]

oh no not the ( add substance here) ploy again.

You are a dull witted sot.

It wasn't clever the first time, and certainly did not age well.

 

[Asclepias]

This is as ignorant as it is wrong.

The right to privacy is guaranteed by the Fifth and 14th Amendments.

Abortion is related to "privacy" as frog is related to "quantum attraction."

You might be an idiot, but at least you're partisan and lack integrity.

Even if that were true the 9th amendment pretty much covers everything else.

 

[daws101]

Rights aren't determined by amendment alone.

That's true, they are merely enumerated.

Case in point, which amendment specifies the right to sell firearms?

The second.

You're not very good at this.

the amendment protects gun ownership for purposes of military duty and collective security

 

[daws101]

oh no not the ( add substance here) ploy again.

You are a dull witted sot.

It wasn't clever the first time, and certainly did not age well.

it must have, you were compelled to answer it.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Murder is not Constitutional.......

Then explain the death penalty ?

Both of you idiots need to learn definitions.

Murder is the unlawful taking of a human life. The death penalty and abortion are both LEGAL killing of a human.

And this was a great ruling by the Court that will be appealed by dumbshits.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Pity most conservatives are incapable of being consistent with their advocacy of civil rights, such as the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay Americans, and the right of those transgender to freedom of expression.

LOL as opposed to the totally consistent liberals? Shut the fuck up