Lefty Wilbury
Active Member
- Nov 4, 2003
- 1,109
- 36
- 36
Originally posted by spillmind
'...I declared a national emergency and issued Executive Order 12947. Because such terrorist activities continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, I have renewed the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12947 annually, most recently on January 21, 1998. Pursuant to section 204(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1703(b)) and section 201 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1631), I hereby report to the Congress that I have exercised my statutory authority to issue an Executive Order that amends Executive Order 12947 in order more effectively to respond to the worldwide threat posed by foreign terrorists. ...'
he signed a little paper but did NOTHING to back it up. he CUT inteligence spending and sign on to that retard toricelli pricpale that said we could use intel sources with "shady backgrounds"
Originally posted by spillmind
should lead you to believe that he took action. i would call that 'doing anything'
he also signed th iraq liberation act that stated that regime change should be a us top priority but didn't follow it up either.
Originally posted by spillmind
your article is speculation- at best- and the very reason why people who think clinton/gore caused the 9/11 tragedy is a farce, and holds no water. there is a reason legal recourse is out of the question. not a coindicence, either.
speculation? it's talking to someone who was on the panel.
Originally posted by spillmind
taking money from lobbyists is nothing new to our government. what's funny to me is how people like you post links about parties taking money for favors, and then don't post anything to balance it out, smacking of simply hypocrisy to me.
theres a difference: the report came out they got more money from the airlines they the EVER got and they changed it. quid pro que anyone?
Originally posted by spillmind
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/16/elec04.prez.bush.funds/index.html
bush is on pace for a new record. any favors being done in exchange for this? human rights violations? tax cuts for the rich?
just because these favors don't attribute immediate deaths like 9/11 did, there are much larger impacts on people's lives with the money bush gets.
tax cuts for the rich? so a nyc cop and a public school teacher are rich? peple who are married are rich? with kids? are they rich too? they all got tax cuts rangeing from 1000 to 3000 dollars.