BOOM Rep. Loudermilk Uncovers Text Showing Liz Cheney Was Colluding Directly with Liar 'Trump Grabbed the Steering Wheel' Cassidy Hutchinson

[munkle]

The Jan. 6 Committee was a trial proceeding. It was to determine the events of that day. It was NOT a criminal proceeding. Miranda would not apply. The presence of an attorney was NOT required. Ms. Hutchinson testified on what she heard and saw that day. Thank you for playing grasping at straws.

All you are saying is it was ok for her to lie.

 

[ThisIsMe]

So what?

This was an investigation not a trial. The purpose was fact finding. Cheney is free to talk to any witness to find out what her planned testimony would be and whether it is relevant to the investigation.
If she instructed Hutchinson to lie, then you may have a case

Really? The investigators are allowed to talk to the witnesses before their testimony? Are you seeing the text coming out of your fingers? Had anyone on the trump team did that, you'd be calling for them to be sent to the gulag

 

[rightwinger]

Really? The investigators are allowed to talk to the witnesses before their testimony? Are you seeing the text coming out of your fingers? Had anyone on the trump team did that, you'd be calling for them to be sent to the gulag

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

 

[struth]

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

 

[Care4all]

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

Gosh almighty....

Cassie wanted to talk to Cheney about her lawyer, who Cassie did not trust. Of course Cassie would not bring her lawyer, that she did not trust.


Could you be any more dishonest?

 

[struth]

Gosh almighty....

Cassie wanted to talk to Cheney about her lawyer, who Cassie did not trust. Of course Cassie would not bring her lawyer, that she did not trust.


Could you be any more dishonest?

You didn’t read the investigation? She said her attorney had her best interest at heart

She was contacted by Cheney through back channels and an encrypted text app by Liz

And then changed her testimony to lies and put on prime time tv to lie

Why you think that’s ok. Is mind blowing

 

[rightwinger]

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

It is Hutchinsons right to have an attorney present during questioning
Hutchinson requested the meeting but it is HER responsibility to bring him

Show where Cheney made her change her testimony

 

[rightwinger]

You didn’t read the investigation? She said her attorney had her best interest at heart

She was contacted by Cheney through back channels and an encrypted text app by Liz

And then changed her testimony to lies and put on prime time tv to lie

Why you think that’s ok. Is mind blowing

Hutchinson had an attorney provided by Trump
That attorney had Trumps interests in mind not his clients

Hutchinson fired him

 

[struth]

It is Hutchinsons right to have an attorney present during questioning
Hutchinson requested the meeting but it is HER responsibility to bring him

Show where Cheney made her change her testimony

Geez dembot

Why are you ignoring the fact that Liz used backchannels to talk to her behind her attorney’s back to begin with?

Why do you dembots like to start the story halfway through the book?

 

[struth]

Hutchinson had an attorney provided by Trump
That attorney had Trumps interests in mind not his clients

Hutchinson fired him

The text message show that no it wasn’t an attorney provided by trump, and more importantly before Liz’s backchannels, she liked her attorney and believed he had her best interest at heart

Why do you lie? And continue to ignore bipartisan investigations?

 

[rightwinger]

The text message show that no it wasn’t an attorney provided by trump, and more importantly before Liz’s backchannels, she liked her attorney and believed he had her best interest at heart

Why do you lie? And continue to ignore bipartisan investigations?

That is why she contacted Cheney
She wasn’t comfortable with her attorney

You still have no criminal act on Cheneys part

 

[DStar777]

The purpose was fact finding.

No it wasn't. If it was, the Secret Service agents in the Limo would have been called to testify. Why weren't they?

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

You do realize you need actual evidence of a crime

... says the person who likely believed what Trump is accused of without real evidence.

 

[rightwinger]

No it wasn't. If it was, the Secret Service agents in the Limo would have been called to testify. Why weren't they?

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

... says the person who likely believed what Trump is accused of without real evidence.

Wasnt relevant to the investigation

Trumps temper tantrum in the limo was just an amusing side note

 

[ThisIsMe]

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

it wasn't a trial. It was a congressional committee investigating a political opponent. A committee member trying to derail a president talking to a witness before having them testify is unethical.

 

[rightwinger]

it wasn't a trial. It was a congressional committee investigating a political opponent. A committee member trying to derail a president talking to a witness before having them testify is unethical.

Exactly

A Congressional investigation has much greater latitude than a prosecutor in a criminal trial

There are no laws against a Congressional Committee member talking to a potential witness…….Republicans are making it up