Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It looks like her finger is resting against the trigger guard, not on the trigger.By their behavior.
NRA SAFETY RULES
This is the primary rule of gun safety. Always keep the gun pointed in a direction where no unintended injury or damage could ever possibly occur if it were to fire.
When holding (but not firing) a gun, always rest your finger up high alongside the frame and well outside the trigger guard. Never, ever pick up a firearm with your finger on the trigger or casually rest your finger on the trigger while you aren’t shooting. Until you are ready to fire, do not touch the trigger at all.
View attachment 880534
See post #198. Please acknowledge that you have read and understand it. Thanks.Seriously?
You offered nothing but pure idiocy that doesn't apply in the situation under discussion.I mention it because you used the phrase shoot to kill. That phrase will get you in a lot of trouble. Just that phrase. And like out fairly recent example, the McMichaels, you would talk and pretty much guarantee that you stood trial.
Defensive Gun Use: What to Expect After a Self-Defense Shooting - U.S. LawShield
In this guide: defensive gun use: what to expect after a self-defense shooting, we'll cover: how to call 911, what happens to your gun and much more.www.uslawshield.com
I offer that link as a primer on what you should do. Maybe, with a little luck, if you ever do have to fire in self defense, the lawyer will help you avoid prison. You would not believe how many people talked their way into prison.
How does one civilly tell you that you are making things up and engaging in fallacy?I am about ready to put you back on ignore again.
I included my thoughts, the text of the pardon (post 42), a link to support my assertions which was written by a distinguished legal scholar at UCLA (post 236).
I would be happy to have a civil discussion with you if you have a point to make on this Law and Justice System forum.
They didn’t get in trouble for gun safety, they got in trouble for brandishing guns at rioters.Thats not how gun safety or the law works.
It's what I do when criminals trespass and threaten me.I personally think anyone who brandishes a weapon as a threat is deranged. Don't you?
Yes:Are you sure about that?
Any reasonable observer could easily determine that their "brandishing" was purely a defensive posture, not offensive or aggressive. Under the law if someone feels threatened, they have that right. The McCloskey's are victims of woke politics, nothing more. The whole sordid episode just adds to the stench coming from liberal government.They didn’t get in trouble for gun safety, they got in trouble for brandishing guns at rioters.
Any reasonable observer could easily determine that their "brandishing" was purely a defensive posture, not offensive or aggressive. Under the law if someone feels threatened, they have that right. The McCloskey's are victims of woke politics, nothing more. The whole sordid episode just adds to the stench coming from liberal government.
They didn’t get in trouble for gun safety, they got in trouble for brandishing guns at rioters.
Absolutely.Of course you do, lol.
Hey, the '50's were great.Of course you do, lol.
Our criminal justice system is blind, or worse, they're not. You can only screw up for so long before people begin to think you're doing it on purpose. The question is, what is the purpose?Yeah, I don’t doubt you, the problem is, in the face of the law, it’s what is within the guidelines of the law. You and I both can know what their intent was, but, with blind justice, it’s what is legal.