BREAKING! Joe Biden Caught in the Act of a 18 U.S. Code § 793 Violation According to Special Counsel Jack Smith

So you think the Democrat party is sane? Tell us how many sexes there are?

Human sexuality is more complex than A or B.

051_sad0917MontA3p-01.png



They were all loyal swamp members. Trump is the only one who said he wanted to flush the swamp.

And this is the kind of crazy I am talking about ^^^^^. The only thing Trump did different is he was willing to say the quiet part about racism out loud.

That's it.
 
Just like a stupid fucking leftard.

Ridicule the source, deflect to Trump.

Alinsky 101.

The funny thing is, the world is laughing at you idiots now.

The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) – Bias and Credibility​


The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse)- Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
  • Overall, we rate The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) as far-right biased and questionable based on the use of poor sources, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, a complete lack of transparency, and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Fake News, False Claims
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) - Bias and Credibility

:eusa_whistle:
 
Human sexuality is more complex than A or B.

051_sad0917MontA3p-01.png
I can't read your document, asshole. Even if I could, the fact is that 99.999% of humans are XY or XX.

And this is the kind of crazy I am talking about ^^^^^. The only thing Trump did different is he was willing to say the quiet part about racism out loud.

That's it.
Trump didn't say anything racist, douchebag.
 

The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) – Bias and Credibility​


The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse)- Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
  • Overall, we rate The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) as far-right biased and questionable based on the use of poor sources, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, a complete lack of transparency, and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Fake News, False Claims
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse) - Bias and Credibility

:eusa_whistle:
Do you imagine we find your source credible?
 
Post #22

You can end the thread right there. :)

Only diff for me is that I ditched Repubs in 2000 after they impeached a President for a BJ.
 
Actually, I voted Republican from 1980 to 2008.
In the 80's, I was in the military, and Republicans were good to the military.
In the 1990's, Bill Clinton was such a sleaze that I voted for Republicans by default.
The break came from me in the Aughts, when I saw how the GOP was all in on screwing over the working class to benefit the investor class, and pandering to the religous nuts to do it.

The final straw for me was when the GOP nominated Romney in 2012. Because I really, really fucking hate Mormons. I dislike most religions, but Mormons I find particularly contemptable because we can PROVE Joseph Smith was a lying sack of crap, but they still believe him.

Your party had 10 guys who would have made a decent president in 2016. Instead, you went with the Reality TV Rodeo Clown.
What a clown
 
Human sexuality is more complex than A or B.

051_sad0917MontA3p-01.png





And this is the kind of crazy I am talking about ^^^^^. The only thing Trump did different is he was willing to say the quiet part about racism out loud.

That's it.

The Dem party, the “Party of Slavery” has always shown that actions speak with the greatest clarity.

BTW, men don’t get pregnant. Tell your friends.
 
That troll has admitted she doesn’t use unbiased sources. Only far left rags. Pretty obvious by the debunked crap it keeps spitting put.

then it should be easy peasy to find one of them thar posts of mine.....


riiiiiight? ⏳
 
What difference does that make, as long as the number is above ZERO.

There are four viable genetic combinations. That can't be combined into only two catagories.

There have always been abnormalities in mammals. Science wont reclassify the genders of moose because they found one with a dick and a uterus.
 
The courts have thrown out most of his cases. He's a hit man, not a legitimate prosecutor.

John Luman Smith was raised in Clay, New York, a suburb of Syracuse. He attended the State University of New York (SUNY) at Oneonta, graduating summa cum laude in 1991, and Harvard Law School, where he received a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree in 1994.

After serving as a prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office (1994–99), Smith joined the Brooklyn office of the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, where he held various supervisory positions, including that of chief of criminal litigation.

From 2008 to 2010 he served as a director of investigations for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. He returned to the United States in 2010 to take up an appointment as head of the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates and prosecutes politicians and government officials accused of corruption.

He later served as first assistant U.S. attorney and then acting U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee (2015–17), as vice president and head of litigation for the Hospital Corporation of America (2017–18), and, having returned to the ICC in 2018, as a “specialist prosecutor” of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed by or against citizens of Kosovo between 1998 and 2000.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jack-Smith

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top