Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,460
- 15,583
- 2,180
YOU are the one who said the shooting of an innocent woman was JUSTIFIED!
Actually, that would be the investigation into the shooting that found no evidence of a crime.
But so much for your psuedo-legal nonsense about Ray Epps, eh?
And since you don't know shit about anything you're discussing, let me walk you through your blunder. The sky in the picture is question is BLACK. It was the night before, on January 5th. Epps advocated no violence even then, he did advocate going into the capitol.
Not beating cops. Not hanging Mike Pence. Not smashing windows or violently tearing through barricades. Not any of that hateful, violent shit that MAGA did.
But simply going into the capitol.
Which is perfectly protected free speech under the imminent lawless action standard established by the Supreme Court in 1973. See, for 'incitement', you need an act of speech that incites lawless action that is to occur imminently. Not a day later, after a several meals and a good night's sleep. See Hess v. Indiana if you'd like a real education.
So I ask again, why do you want to shoot Ray Epps?
Last edited: