Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
In the case of Kagan, we have an unbelievable display of overt bias in addition to the shadow-bias the entire Court is displaying to the public: Justices Indicate Shadow-Bias Gay Marriage Question Erodes Last Bastion of Impariality Page 40 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
This is behavior unbecoming on an unsettled question of law for a US Supreme Court Justice. I just stumbled upon this today:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Elena Kagan has officiated for the first time at a same-sex wedding, a Maryland ceremony for her former law clerk and his husband.
Kagan presided on Sunday over the wedding of former clerk Mitchell Reich and Patrick Pearsall in the Washington suburb of Chevy Chase, Maryland. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan Performs Her First Same-Sex WeddingBy the Court's 2009 Finding, Kagan must recuse herself from sitting on the upcoming Hearing on gay marriage.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that elected judges must step aside from cases when large campaign contributions from interested parties create the appearance of bias...Voting 5-4 in a case from West Virginia, the high court said that a judge who remained involved in a lawsuit — one filed against a company helmed by a generous supporter of the justice's campaign — deprived the other side of the constitutional right to a fair trial.Court Judges must avoid appearance of bias - politics - Supreme Court NBC News
Well said..., whats more Ginsberg has also stated her own prejudice, claiming publicly that her own 'feelings' of popular support for the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality, overrides the Legislative majorities that the Leftist judiciary is busily working to overturn. Absolute INSANITY... which should require her recusal as well and would in a world not governed through MADNESS!