longknife
Diamond Member
- Sep 21, 2012
- 42,221
- 13,091
What the hell?
Anchor Rachel Maddow asked, “Are you considering legal action, or do you think you have a legal right to exert against the president’s actions here?”
Brennan answered, “Well, I think, as you can imagine, a number of lawyers have reached out to say that there is a very strong case here, not so much to reclaim mine, but to prevent this from happening in the future. And so, I am thinking about what it is that I might want to do. At this time, I’m trying to make sure that the principle is what is going to be defended and supported, and this is something that should not be repeated.”
These people are brain dead.
The law concerning security clearance is 50 U.S. Code Chapter 45 › Subchapter III › § 3341 and is very clear as to who can and cannot havc one and who is responsible for giving them.
From Brennan: I'm 'Thinking About' Taking Legal Action over Security Clearance Revocation | Breitbart
Mark Warner Threatens Amendment to ‘Block’ Trump from Voiding Security Clearances @ Mark Warner Plans to 'Block' Trump from Voiding Security Clearances
Another brain dead DimocRAT. It won’t go anywhere. A total waste of time.
Brennan: I Didn’t Mean That Trump Committed Treason @ Brennan: I Didn't Mean That Trump Committed Treason | Breitbart
On Friday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” former CIA Director John Brennan stated that he didn’t mean President Trump committed treason when he referred to the president’s performance at the Helsinki summit as “nothing short of treasonous.”
Sure as hell seems to me that’s exactly what he said!
Mattis: A Security Clearance Is Granted on an ‘As-Needed Basis’ @ Mattis: A Security Clearance Is Granted On an 'As-Needed Basis'
Of course it is! Anyone who’s had one knows this.
Anchor Rachel Maddow asked, “Are you considering legal action, or do you think you have a legal right to exert against the president’s actions here?”
Brennan answered, “Well, I think, as you can imagine, a number of lawyers have reached out to say that there is a very strong case here, not so much to reclaim mine, but to prevent this from happening in the future. And so, I am thinking about what it is that I might want to do. At this time, I’m trying to make sure that the principle is what is going to be defended and supported, and this is something that should not be repeated.”
These people are brain dead.
The law concerning security clearance is 50 U.S. Code Chapter 45 › Subchapter III › § 3341 and is very clear as to who can and cannot havc one and who is responsible for giving them.
From Brennan: I'm 'Thinking About' Taking Legal Action over Security Clearance Revocation | Breitbart
Mark Warner Threatens Amendment to ‘Block’ Trump from Voiding Security Clearances @ Mark Warner Plans to 'Block' Trump from Voiding Security Clearances
Another brain dead DimocRAT. It won’t go anywhere. A total waste of time.
Brennan: I Didn’t Mean That Trump Committed Treason @ Brennan: I Didn't Mean That Trump Committed Treason | Breitbart
On Friday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” former CIA Director John Brennan stated that he didn’t mean President Trump committed treason when he referred to the president’s performance at the Helsinki summit as “nothing short of treasonous.”
Sure as hell seems to me that’s exactly what he said!
Mattis: A Security Clearance Is Granted on an ‘As-Needed Basis’ @ Mattis: A Security Clearance Is Granted On an 'As-Needed Basis'
Of course it is! Anyone who’s had one knows this.