Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
are you an egghead math person? Trump is making America great again!!!Let me clarify something here... Sprint is owned by SoftBank. SoftBank met with Trump and now they are saying they are going to bring back 5,000 jobs. If Trump gets the Sprint buy out of T-Mobile, you realize that more than 5,000 jobs will be consolidated? Therefor this deal will cost more jobs than it creates?
Sprint Corporation sold to SoftBank. Three years ago, the buying was a direct connection.Let me clarify something here... Sprint is owned by SoftBank. SoftBank met with Trump and now they are saying they are going to bring back 5,000 jobs. If Trump gets the Sprint buy out of T-Mobile, you realize that more than 5,000 jobs will be consolidated? Therefor this deal will cost more jobs than it creates?
Sprint Corporation sold to SoftBank. Three years ago, the buying was a direct connection.Let me clarify something here... Sprint is owned by SoftBank. SoftBank met with Trump and now they are saying they are going to bring back 5,000 jobs. If Trump gets the Sprint buy out of T-Mobile, you realize that more than 5,000 jobs will be consolidated? Therefor this deal will cost more jobs than it creates?
SoftBank bought 2% more shares of Sprint Corporation, increasing its ownership stake in the company to 80%.
I think that the jobs will be consolidated because jobs need to be kept at their own peaks.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
It'll cut by about more than 10%?Sprint Corporation sold to SoftBank. Three years ago, the buying was a direct connection.Let me clarify something here... Sprint is owned by SoftBank. SoftBank met with Trump and now they are saying they are going to bring back 5,000 jobs. If Trump gets the Sprint buy out of T-Mobile, you realize that more than 5,000 jobs will be consolidated? Therefor this deal will cost more jobs than it creates?
SoftBank bought 2% more shares of Sprint Corporation, increasing its ownership stake in the company to 80%.
I think that the jobs will be consolidated because jobs need to be kept at their own peaks.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Well one of the largest components of buying out companies is for the resources, and to consolidate jobs between the companies to increase profits. So obviously a bunch of jobs would be cut.
It'll cut by about more than 10%?Sprint Corporation sold to SoftBank. Three years ago, the buying was a direct connection.Let me clarify something here... Sprint is owned by SoftBank. SoftBank met with Trump and now they are saying they are going to bring back 5,000 jobs. If Trump gets the Sprint buy out of T-Mobile, you realize that more than 5,000 jobs will be consolidated? Therefor this deal will cost more jobs than it creates?
SoftBank bought 2% more shares of Sprint Corporation, increasing its ownership stake in the company to 80%.
I think that the jobs will be consolidated because jobs need to be kept at their own peaks.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Well one of the largest components of buying out companies is for the resources, and to consolidate jobs between the companies to increase profits. So obviously a bunch of jobs would be cut.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Exactly. Agree or disagree with this topic I posted?25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is higher than 10%... of course it is, but companies don't merge in order to only be able to cut 10% of a redundant work force. There wouldn't be a significant enough amount of increased profits from only cutting 10% of those jobs.
Exactly. Agree or disagree with this topic I posted?25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is higher than 10%... of course it is, but companies don't merge in order to only be able to cut 10% of a redundant work force. There wouldn't be a significant enough amount of increased profits from only cutting 10% of those jobs.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Sprint wants 62.5% (5,000) of their jobs back, and the other technology company, OneWeb wants their 37.5% (3,000) jobs back.Exactly. Agree or disagree with this topic I posted?25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is higher than 10%... of course it is, but companies don't merge in order to only be able to cut 10% of a redundant work force. There wouldn't be a significant enough amount of increased profits from only cutting 10% of those jobs.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Look, here is what I'm going to say. Sprint is saying they are bringing back 5,000 jobs right now. Trump is taking credit for it and getting the good press. In 6 months to a year when Trump presses the Commerce Department to approve the Sprint acquisition of T-Mobile, by 2018 on the back side of page 8 you'll read about how Sprint laid off 10,000 former T-Mobile/Sprint employees to increase profits.
this whole story is just a work. Period.
Sprint wants 62.5% (5,000) of their jobs back, and the other technology company, OneWeb wants their 37.5% (3,000) jobs back.Exactly. Agree or disagree with this topic I posted?25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is higher than 10%... of course it is, but companies don't merge in order to only be able to cut 10% of a redundant work force. There wouldn't be a significant enough amount of increased profits from only cutting 10% of those jobs.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Look, here is what I'm going to say. Sprint is saying they are bringing back 5,000 jobs right now. Trump is taking credit for it and getting the good press. In 6 months to a year when Trump presses the Commerce Department to approve the Sprint acquisition of T-Mobile, by 2018 on the back side of page 8 you'll read about how Sprint laid off 10,000 former T-Mobile/Sprint employees to increase profits.
this whole story is just a work. Period.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Of course they are some customer service jobs. It does matter when 10,000 jobs will be broken.Sprint wants 62.5% (5,000) of their jobs back, and the other technology company, OneWeb wants their 37.5% (3,000) jobs back.Exactly. Agree or disagree with this topic I posted?25% is more than 10%. Exactly or less than that percent doesn't work at cutting jobs. I am thinking that over 1,200 jobs should be lost, making the unemployment rate be a teeny-weeny higher.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
25% is higher than 10%... of course it is, but companies don't merge in order to only be able to cut 10% of a redundant work force. There wouldn't be a significant enough amount of increased profits from only cutting 10% of those jobs.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Look, here is what I'm going to say. Sprint is saying they are bringing back 5,000 jobs right now. Trump is taking credit for it and getting the good press. In 6 months to a year when Trump presses the Commerce Department to approve the Sprint acquisition of T-Mobile, by 2018 on the back side of page 8 you'll read about how Sprint laid off 10,000 former T-Mobile/Sprint employees to increase profits.
this whole story is just a work. Period.
Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk
Yeah but with Sprint isn't that just customer service jobs? If they bring back 5,000 customer service jobs, but then cut 10,000 jobs that include customer service and other various jobs, what does it matter?
