🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Brisbane (Australia) hits coldest temperature in 103 years

Cool. In this thread, we have a USMB nutter denying that climate change is even happening. He's stating that the earth is getting cooler in his juvenile manner. But....he uses the term "AGW". Anthropogenic. Key word.

You know why that is?

It is because he isn't sure that climate change isn't happening...and if the shit hits the fan, he wants to be able to say that it is happening but not due to human impact. Frail egos do shit like that. Dude needs to leave wiggle room.

Its in the 80s here, odd for Florida, climate change means more extremes, overall warming.

science deniers are amusing, aren't they?

they think G-d won't give them anything they can't destroy :cuckoo:

science has provided the tools that the earth is "destroyed" with.
 
The bad news just keeps rolling in for the AGW cult:

Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

If you are lucky enough to be reading this from the comfort of your blankets, it might be best to stay there, as Brisbane has hit its coldest temperatures in 103 years.

Not since July 28 1911 has Brisbane felt this cold, getting down to a brisk 2.6C at 6.41am.

At 7am, it inched up to 3.3C.

Matt Bass, meteorologist from BOM, said the region was well below our average temperatures.

“If it felt cold, that’s because it was, breaking that record is pretty phenomenal for Brisbane,” Bass said.

“The average for this time of year is 12C, so Brisbane was about 9C below average, it is pretty impressive really, to have the coldest morning in 103 years is a big record.”

The coldest place across the state was Oakey which got down to -6.1C, which was the coldest temperature for the town since 2011.

Expect the usual response:

It is local weather, not climate, and the coldest temperatures ARE the results of global warming.

So, there!
 
Jung begins his post with:Just a few years ago climate experts prophesied that Germany would no longer experience winters with ice and snow in the future. In the 1990s there had been an entire series of milder and stormier winters. [...] However, this trend has not been observed over the last years. To the contrary: winters have again gotten considerably colder and the huge storms like those in the 1990s have more or less disappeared. [...]. Climate experts prophesied in the year 2000 that winters with snow and ice in Germany would cease to exist.”- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2013/02/17/...der-than-normal-winters/#sthash.xWcjATGw.dpuf
Meteorologist Dominik Jung Turns Skeptical After Germany Sets Record 5 Consecutive Colder-Than-Normal Winters!
 
Last edited:
The bad news just keeps rolling in for the AGW cult:

Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

If you are lucky enough to be reading this from the comfort of your blankets, it might be best to stay there, as Brisbane has hit its coldest temperatures in 103 years.

Not since July 28 1911 has Brisbane felt this cold, getting down to a brisk 2.6C at 6.41am.

At 7am, it inched up to 3.3C.

Matt Bass, meteorologist from BOM, said the region was well below our average temperatures.

“If it felt cold, that’s because it was, breaking that record is pretty phenomenal for Brisbane,” Bass said.

“The average for this time of year is 12C, so Brisbane was about 9C below average, it is pretty impressive really, to have the coldest morning in 103 years is a big record.”

The coldest place across the state was Oakey which got down to -6.1C, which was the coldest temperature for the town since 2011.

Expect the usual response:

It is local weather, not climate, and the coldest temperatures ARE the results of global warming.

So, there!

Extremes are the result of climate change:

Climate extremes and the carbon cycle : Nature : Nature Publishing Group
 
No one is denying science or climate change, we're asking for you to provide EVIDENCE! Lab experiments. Shouting Consensus is not science

cern-07.jpg


^ real science. Can simulate condition a few nanoseconds after the Big Bang and create mini black holes

prinn-roulette-4a1.jpg


^ Fake Science. Can't reproduce ANY of their theory in a Lab so they resort to stupid Game Show instead
 
Cool. In this thread, we have a USMB nutter denying that climate change is even happening. He's stating that the earth is getting cooler in his juvenile manner. But....he uses the term "AGW". Anthropogenic. Key word.

You know why that is?

It is because he isn't sure that climate change isn't happening...and if the shit hits the fan, he wants to be able to say that it is happening but not due to human impact. Frail egos do shit like that. Dude needs to leave wiggle room.

Its in the 80s here, odd for Florida, climate change means more extremes, overall warming.

science deniers are amusing, aren't they?

they think G-d won't give them anything they can't destroy :cuckoo:

Well there Jillian, if it is anyone who is a science denier it would be the liberal left.

For example, they ignore the science that the US has cooled since 1998/1999. Completely ignore it.

They say that the unborn child is something other then an un born child, again denying science. Or then they will say that life doesn't start until the first breath, if ever there was religious hocky pocky that would be it.

Or they deny evolution with say that homosexuality is natural.
 
I posted the story about the Antarctic, did anyone see anything in the short report that seems really strange?
We already had a thread about the net increase in polar ice for this year with Antarctica providing all of the increase.
 
Its in the 80s here, odd for Florida, climate change means more extremes, overall warming.

science deniers are amusing, aren't they?

they think G-d won't give them anything they can't destroy :cuckoo:

Well there Jillian, if it is anyone who is a science denier it would be the liberal left.

For example, they ignore the science that the US has cooled since 1998/1999. Completely ignore it.

They say that the unborn child is something other then an un born child, again denying science. Or then they will say that life doesn't start until the first breath, if ever there was religious hocky pocky that would be it.

Or they deny evolution with say that homosexuality is natural.

Two cooler years versus an increase of 1 degree over a century proves nothing:

Climate extremes can negate the expected increase in terrestrial carbon uptake | www.ileaps.org
 
science deniers are amusing, aren't they?

they think G-d won't give them anything they can't destroy :cuckoo:

Well there Jillian, if it is anyone who is a science denier it would be the liberal left.

For example, they ignore the science that the US has cooled since 1998/1999. Completely ignore it.

They say that the unborn child is something other then an un born child, again denying science. Or then they will say that life doesn't start until the first breath, if ever there was religious hocky pocky that would be it.

Or they deny evolution with say that homosexuality is natural.

Two cooler years versus an increase of 1 degree over a century proves nothing:

Climate extremes can negate the expected increase in terrestrial carbon uptake | www.ileaps.org

I am thinking you misunderstood, not 1998 and 1999, from 1998 of 1999, to now
 
what scientists say

In 2007 101 key scientists*contradict the IPCC Report.
In 2008 650 scientists, 12 times the 52 signers, dissent at the UN meeting.
In 2008 The Japan Geoscience Union symposium survey showed 90% of participants do not believe the IPCC report.
In 2009 700 key scientists sign the*Inhofe Senate report* debunking man-made global warming claims.
In 2009 The International Conference on Climate Change had all 700 scientists agree that CO2 does not cause global warming.
 
Did you also know that in 2012 over 10,200 scientists were asked to answer a survey on global warming and only 77 replied. Of the 77, 75 stated yes to its existence. (And none of those climate scientists that have been verbally loud against global warming occurring received the survey. ) Thus where they get the 97% figure that agree, never divulging over 10,000 did not even answer the survey. An anonymous 2 minute survey.
The 2007 ipcc report? Claimed 2500 agreed, turns out it was actually 25.
 
Its in the 80s here, odd for Florida, climate change means more extremes, overall warming.

science deniers are amusing, aren't they?

they think G-d won't give them anything they can't destroy :cuckoo:

Well there Jillian, if it is anyone who is a science denier it would be the liberal left.

For example, they ignore the science that the US has cooled since 1998/1999. Completely ignore it.

They say that the unborn child is something other then an un born child, again denying science. Or then they will say that life doesn't start until the first breath, if ever there was religious hocky pocky that would be it.

Or they deny evolution with say that homosexuality is natural.

thank you for proving that you don't understand the issue or understand the reality. but thank you for the rightwingnut talking points, particularly the little insane non-sequitur about gays.

:cuckoo:
 
We used to call it weather.

In the discussion of climate change, climate disruption or global warming weather has no meaning. Of course the weather is the measure used to evaluate CC/CD/GW but other then that it is meaningless, especially when the temperature goes down.

Have you ever noticed that very complex systems (like our climate) have the tendency to exhibit strange fluctuations in what was once normal operations right before they collapse?

Like maybe the weather patterns will get very odd and extreme as the climate system moves toward a collapse in the distant future.

Just curious if you ever noticed that happening.

Our complex wealther system has always exhibited strange fluctuations with large cold spikes and large warm spikes. It is not, and never has been a straight line function, and therefore no one can say whether what we experience today is just another spike, or is actually an anomaly created by man.
 
Doesn't anyone find this just a bit odd? Or is everyone just repeating their talking points without reading anything?

"Other unusual features of the June temperature record are an unusual excess of sunlight hours (11.8 hours rather than the normal 7.4 hours), and unusually light wind conditions."

A 4.4 hour difference, is that even possible? Not unless the Earth's tilt moved.
 
Cool. In this thread, we have a USMB nutter denying that climate change is even happening. He's stating that the earth is getting cooler in his juvenile manner. But....he uses the term "AGW". Anthropogenic. Key word.

You know why that is?

It is because he isn't sure that climate change isn't happening...and if the shit hits the fan, he wants to be able to say that it is happening but not due to human impact. Frail egos do shit like that. Dude needs to leave wiggle room.
Deniers don't know the difference in weather and climate change.
 

Forum List

Back
Top