Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #161
And...the Constitution says "equality". So, where states cannot discriminate against one sexual orientation the majority objected to including in marriage, they may not discriminate against ANY sexual orientation the majority objected to including in marriage.Its a State issue.......subject to constitutional guarantees. Exactly as the Windsor decision outlines. When a state law violates constitutional guaratees, the courts have the duty to place the constitution above the piece of legislation.
Which is exactly what Obergefell did.
I'm glad I'm not the one of the Fascist-Five Justices. They're going to have a hellof a time saying "NO" to polyamorist-Americans..