manu1959
Left Coast Isolationist
SpidermanTuba said:"PRESIDENT BUSH: People ask me why I picked Harriet Miers. They want to know Harriet Miers' background; they want to know as much as they possibly can before they form opinions. And part of Harriet Miers' life is her religion. Part of it has to do with the fact that she was a pioneer woman and a trailblazer in the law in Texas. ...."
Alright grammer expert, perhaps you can tell us what word differentiates the last sentence as being a qualification from the second to last sentence as being a non-qaulification about her life? How do we know it isn't the other way around? How do we know they aren't both just about her life and not listed as qualifications? Tell me, English teacher, we all want to know. Perhaps the President completely forgot that he even said "People ask me why I picked Harriet Miers" and instead went on to tell us about her life instead? I might believe that - he is pretty scatter brained. But I would like to know what differentiates one from being a qualification and one from being simply about her life - especially considering they are both "part" of something, according to you, two different things.
dude....you kicked your own ass twice in this thread already.....what are you doing going for the natural hat trick :wank: