daveman
Diamond Member
Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?Explain it to the judge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?Explain it to the judge
How 'bout we just shoot 'em in the head on the battlefield?
Works for me. All nice and legal, too.
Which would be fine and dandy if they were found on a battlefield.
Wouldn't be fine and dandy with everyone. There are people...Americans...who don't want us fighting terrorists at all.
Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?Explain it to the judge
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
Here's one. Living proof that educated is not synonymous with intelligent.Which would be fine and dandy if they were found on a battlefield.
Wouldn't be fine and dandy with everyone. There are people...Americans...who don't want us fighting terrorists at all.
Really?
Name one
Wrong. Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me.Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?Explain it to the judge
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?Explain it to the judge
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
Wrong. Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me.Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
However, you were asked for a Constitutional justification and quoted the preamble. In order for your claim to be correct, you must provide case law that cited the preamble.
Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
Nope...you have to prove that health care law promotes the General Welfare.
Line-item Vetos were declared unconstitutional and so will this be.
amnesty international filed today:
US must begin criminal investigation of torture following Bush admission
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture:
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture | Raw Story
Not that a former president will ever be dealt real justice, but making sure his legacy of torture and hatred of the constitution stays alive is the least we can do
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
Nope...you have to prove that health care law promotes the General Welfare.
Line-item Vetos were declared unconstitutional and so will this be.
Not at all..those who are claiming the Health Care Law is un-constitutional have to prove their case.
Hasn't happened...never will
Wrong. Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me.Can you cite any case law that was decided on the Preamble?
General Welfare is not collecting a check every week or being forced to purchase expensive health insurance or face fines or imprisonment.
This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
However, you were asked for a Constitutional justification and quoted the preamble. In order for your claim to be correct, you must provide case law that cited the preamble.
You're really not paying attention. I suggest you stop quoting the preamble to justify laws.Wrong. Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me.This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
However, you were asked for a Constitutional justification and quoted the preamble. In order for your claim to be correct, you must provide case law that cited the preamble.
Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me
Our courts get to decide the constitutionality of our laws...not you
amnesty international filed today:
US must begin criminal investigation of torture following Bush admission
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture:
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture | Raw Story
Not that a former president will ever be dealt real justice, but making sure his legacy of torture and hatred of the constitution stays alive is the least we can do
if your legal department says that it isn't torture and you authorize it ...
did you break the law .....
if you sent people to another country and they "tortured" people but you "didn't know" what they were doing .....
did you break the law ....
Wrong. Someone else defined general welfare; it wasn't me.This is your claim. It is up to you to prove they are unconstitutional in a court of law
That is the way things work in this country
However, you were asked for a Constitutional justification and quoted the preamble. In order for your claim to be correct, you must provide case law that cited the preamble.
It's not only in the preamble..it's under the powers of Congress.
amnesty international filed today:
US must begin criminal investigation of torture following Bush admission
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture:
Republican congressman: I have no hesitation whatsoever in probing Bush for torture | Raw Story
Not that a former president will ever be dealt real justice, but making sure his legacy of torture and hatred of the constitution stays alive is the least we can do
if your legal department says that it isn't torture and you authorize it ...
did you break the law .....
if you sent people to another country and they "tortured" people but you "didn't know" what they were doing .....
did you break the law ....
Both are pretty sticky wickets aren't they..
There is no real way that Bush or even Cheney would see any prison time.
But that's not the point. Enacting legislation to make sure these sort of actions never (or are highly unlikely) repeated..is..