Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #21
Oh look, the LGBT nazis in California are trying to suppress signatures required to put the anti-transgender bathroom bill on the ballot. There had to be a court order to force counties to disgorge signatures collected there. Gee I wonder if those counties were blue or red?
Wow, when was the last time 1/6th of all signatures were invalidated on a petition? Was that legitimate? I think the court forcing counties to prove up on those invalidations will show some dem hanky panky..
More:
May 26, 2016: A group challenging California’s transgender bathroom law won a procedural victory in court on Friday, coming one step closer to putting the issue of restroom and locker room access to a popular vote...A Sacramento Superior Court judge granted a motion to compel 55 state counties to produce documents pertaining to signatures collected for a ballot initiative. The counties had previously resisted handing over the documents....The legal dispute stems from a 2013 effort by Privacy For All Students, which collected more than 620,000 signatures to put the state’s new transgender bathroom law to a referendum, but was deemed to be 17,276 signatures short after more than 100,000 were invalidated....“We believe we hit the threshold, over 500,000 that we needed to be valid,” said Privacy for All Students spokeswoman Karen England. “But we came up, according to the state, around 15,000 short.”.... California transgender bathroom challenge wins procedural victory
Wow, when was the last time 1/6th of all signatures were invalidated on a petition? Was that legitimate? I think the court forcing counties to prove up on those invalidations will show some dem hanky panky..
More:
Ms. England said when the group went to review the invalidated signatures, the first one they came across was improperly thrown out.
“The very first one that said ‘not registered’ and had been thrown, had been a registered voter since 2010,” she said.