Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,937
- 55,555
- 3,600
You are saying there is a law to keep fraud from being investigated? I don't think so.This law was passed after that “precedent” to stop it from happening again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are saying there is a law to keep fraud from being investigated? I don't think so.This law was passed after that “precedent” to stop it from happening again.
Not prosecuting, persecuting.1. This isnt a 1st amendment issue
2. Nobody is prosecuting anybody for "their opinion"
3. Do you think it is right to claim something that isnt true?
So no, not the same. That was a case where some states didn't certify a winner and was not a case where the VP decided himself which electoral votes to count and which ones to reject. That was also before law was passed mandating a specific date to count the votes.![]()
It Took 115 Days After 1876 Election to Decide President After Fraud Claims
The delay in calling this year's election has tested the patience of Americans, but spare a thought for 19th-century voters.www.newsweek.com
Who cares where your delusions take you?Would you prefer American Marxist, a distinction without a difference.
1. This isn't a 1st amendment issue
2. Nobody is prosecuting anybody for "their opinion"
The issue is law, not morality.3. Do you think it is right to claim something that isnt true?
The people that came to DC had no power to do that. It was a protest to demand an investigation before certifying the election. Again, that is how democracy works, drama queen.
The topic is the fake insurrection, not Pence, assflap.
No you dope. I’m saying there’s a law that says you have to count the certified electors from each state on Jan 6th.You are saying there is a law to keep fraud from being investigated? I don't think so.
Dumbfuck, trying to overthrow the government is treason whether you're capable of understanding that or not.Link us up to the definition of Treason and where it says asking something is treason, Buttercup.
Who in the government has prevented trump from speaking?like hell it isn't
you cannot prove it isn't true.
As long as Wolf Blitzer thinks it's a coup....it's a GD coup.WTF "coup"? A freaking unarmed coup with mom and pop terrorists? Lefties are dreaming. Unlike most of the lawlessness on the left, it was a Constitutionally protected 1st Amendment demonstration with all the permits.
LOLThat is evidence Trump saw this powerpoint? How, Assflap?
Why don't you want fraud investigated if there was none? Why has every swing state done everything they possibly can to stop audits and investigations? Why was any talk of fraud censored? Why don't you want Americans to have trust in their elections?So no, not the same. That was a case where some states didn't certify a winner and was not a case where the VP decided himself which electoral votes to count and which ones to reject. That was also before law was passed mandating a specific date to count the votes.
Cool story.Dumbfuck, trying to overthrow the government is treason whether you're capable of understanding that or not.
Did he say "worse the Watergate"?As long as Wolf Blitzer thinks it's a coup....it's a GD coup.
That’s not my ask, dumb assPence stuck up for the constitution and the country.
Makes him persona non grata in Trump world.
No.....the media called it a coup attempt.Apparently a “coup attempt” was indeed an option discussed.
With all the permits? The permits allowed them to break into the capitol to hunt down Congressmen? Huh I did not know that.As long as Wolf Blitzer thinks it's a coup....it's a GD coup.
I don’t have all day to explain things to you.That’s not my ask, dumb ass
So? You still have no evidence he saw the powerpoint, Dumbass.LOL
Dumbfuck, Trump attempted to do exactly what that document stated. You can argue this is just a coincidence but it doesn't alter the fact Trump tried to do it.
They said that about everything else....so why not!!!Did he say "worse the Watergate"?